OverviewStudents will perform a comparative analysis for different entry modes with emphasis on location advantage and Human resource issues, for the scenario where the head office is in developed country, and proposed development is in south east Asian (developing) Country.
School of Management — MANU2470 Assessment 3: Proposal Assessment Type: Proposal (individual) Due date: Thursday of Week 7 at 23:59 (Melbourne time) Weighting: 30% Word limit: 3000 words (+/– 10%) Length: N/A Overview Students will perform a comparative analysis for different entry modes with emphasis on location advantage and Human resource issues, for the scenario where the head office is in developed country, and proposed development is in south east Asian (developing) Country. Learning Outcomes CLO 5 Demonstrate your knowledge and capability in the internationalisation process and be better prepared for personal involvement including the possibility of an overseas posting. CLO 6 Develop proposals and compile recommendation reports on internationalisation issues in different forms including individual work initiatives, market research analysis and presentation. Page 1 of 6 Assessment details The German company Solawerk AG is the designer and manufacturer of sophisticated solar powered electronic products mainly focused on the telecommunications industry. One of its successful products is a miniature mobile phone charger that is solar powered. This product has been in production for several years and the main customer is a leading German telecommunication group. While the product is selling well, the high production costs in Germany mean that the profit margin is small and the firm’s shareholders have requested that management should investigate ways in which the production costs can be reduced. The management is also very interested in further expansion to the South Asian Market. 1. Discuss and explain the various modes of entry in South East Asian market which can be used as astrategy for further expansion. For at least three of the most attractive modes analyse benefits and possible problems. However, the products are dedicated for the both German market, and for host country markets. 2. For the most suitable country design a strategy for human resource planning, performancemanagement, training and development and for remuneration. Analyse separately three different groups of employees: a) home country nationals b) host country nationals c) neither home nor host country nationals. Please Note − The country is fictional and similarity with real world company is accidental. − Your report needs to be clearly written, well-structured and well presented. You should acknowledge all sources used and provide references where appropriate. References must be presented in approved standard form (e.g. Harvard) and the reference list presented alphabetically by author. Please note that the software program Turnitin may be used in assessing your assignment. Page 2 of 6 Academic integrity and plagiarism Use [RMIT Harvard/APA 6th ed./ AGLC3/ Vancouver— SELECT ONE] referencing style for this assessment. Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas. You should take extreme care that you have: − Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods, − Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites. If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own. RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct. Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including: − Failure to properly document a source − Copyright material from the internet or databases − Collusion between students For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website. Assessment declaration When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration. Working as a group Page 3 of 6 Referencing guidelines You must acknowledge all the courses of information you have used in your assessments. Refer to the RMIT Easy Cite referencing tool to see examples and tips on how to reference in the appropriated style. You can also refer to the library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and referencing guides for printing. Submission format Upload as one single file via the assignments submission page within Canvas. https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student-essentials/rights-and-responsibilities/academic-integrity https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student-essentials/assessment-and-exams/assessment/assessment-declaration http://www.lib.rmit.edu.au/easy-cite/ https://www.rmit.edu.au/library/study/referencing http://www1.rmit.edu.au/library/referencing Many courses require you to work in a group to complete various assessments. It is the collective responsibility of all group members to actively contribute and complete any project. If any individual is unavailable during this time, the group will need to adjust responsibilities to allow for the work to be completed. It is recommended that students elect a group leader to take responsibility for this. Working in a group requires consistent interaction and communication. This should be done within Canvas, Google Hangouts, email etc. Should any individual be unavailable for an extended period of time, it is the responsibility of the group members, or group leader, to advise their tutor to discuss the situation. This should be raised as early as possible if students wish to apply for an extension or special consideration. Only one copy of a group assessment needs to be submitted, however all group names must be added to the report submission. For further information about understanding group work, visit RMIT Learning Lab. Assessment Criteria Criteria Ratings HD Pts D C P N Selection and analysis of the most appropriate modes of entry Identifies and describes all the relevant modes of entry. Provides sound supporting points in analysis, including highly Identifies and describes most of the relevant modes of entry. Provides mostly supporting points in analysis. Identifies and describes some of the relevant modes of entry. Provides some supporting points in analysis, but also presents Identifies and describes very few relevant modes of entry. Could not provide sound supporting points in analysis. Fails to identify and describe the relevant modes of entry. Major errors and inaccuracies in analysis. appropriate some irrelevant sources and points of analysis. exam 6 to >4.79 pts 4.79 to >4.19 pts 4.19 to >3.59 pts 3.59 to >2.99 pts 2.99 to >0 pts 6 Design of strategy and analysis of appropriate factors considering different groups of employees Includes all the relevant factors in the analysis. Provides clear, thorough and accurate analysis of all the factors considering all the different group of employees. Includes most of the relevant factors. There are some minor omissions in analysis of the factors. Presents minor errors in the analysis of the factors considering majority of the different group of Includes some of the relevant factors. There are minor omissions in analysis of the factors. Presents some errors and inaccuracies in the analysis of the factors considering most of the different group of employees. Includes some of the relevant factors. There are major omissions in analysis of the factors. Presents errors and inaccuracies in the analysis of the factors considering some of the different group of Fails to cover all the relevant factors. Major errors and inaccuracies in the analysis of the relevant factors, without considering the different group of employees. employees. employees. 18 to >14.39 pts 14.39 to >12.59 pts 12.59 to >10.79 pts 10.79 to > 8.99 pts 8.99 to > 0 pts 18 https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/welcome Conclusions/ Recommendations Conclusions and recommendations are clearly derived from data analyses. Effective recommendations, solutions and plans of action are provided. Discussion of key conclusions and recommendations are presented and supported by data. Effective recommendations, solutions and plans of action are partially provided Conclusions and recommendations are mostly presented and supported by data, but with some vagueness in writing. Recommendations, solutions or plans of action are incomplete. Conclusions and recommendations are weak, and/or not fully supported by data. Recommendations, solutions or plans of action are missing or trivial. Conclusions or recommendations are missing, or are present but it may be difficult to follow the logic of how these flow from data analyses. No evidence is given to support conclusions. Recommendations, solutions or plans of action are not provided. 3 to >2.39 pts 2.39 to >2.09 pts 2.09 to >1.79 pts 1.79 to >1.49 pts 1