ONPS2374 FOOD MICROBIOLOGY GUIDELINES AND MARKING RUBRIC: POSTGRADUATE WRITTEN REPORT 2022 Please note: This is an INDIVIDUAL assignment. It must be submitted via Turn-It-In on the canvas...

1 answer below »
Food Microbiology


ONPS2374 FOOD MICROBIOLOGY GUIDELINES AND MARKING RUBRIC: POSTGRADUATE WRITTEN REPORT 2022 Please note: This is an INDIVIDUAL assignment. It must be submitted via Turn-It-In on the canvas submission page (Assessment 4). You must use your own words. Plagiarism, if detected (>15% similarity) will result in a loss of marks. Choose a topic from the separate topic list. Write a short “mini-review” addressing the sub- topics indicated for the topic you chose. Marks will be awarded as shown below. TOTAL WORD COUNT EXCLUDING REFERENCES, TABLES AND FIGURES SHOULD BE UNDER APPROXIMATELY 1500 WORDS (+/- 10%) Your report will contain the following sections: • Title page (separate) with your name and student number • Abstract – a concise summary of your findings (up to 150 words). (together 8 marks) • Introduction Introduces the topic; must provide a good context so the reader knows what the current situation is around your topic. Include a short final sentence or two stating what your review will cover (up to 250 words) (15 marks) • Main paragraphs Describe the subtopics shown in bold for the topic you have chosen from the 2022 topics page (see separate document). Use subheadings if you like (recommended). Write in sections coherently and do not include irrelevant details within each section (up to 1000 words; that’s 4 pages double-spaced excluding tables and figures). (60 marks) • Conclusion Include a separate Conclusion section. Must state future prospects or outlook, and key “take home” messages. Use bullet points if you like. Use maximum 100 words. (8 marks) • References Must include at least 8 scientific papers or articles in APA format. (4 marks) Overall standard and quality (5 marks) It will also be assessed for standard and quality, including use of illustrations. NOTE: The use of tables and figures is recommended as these will not be included in the word count, so are a good way to convey information. Each table or figure must be original and contain a legend and be quoted in the text. Criteria Marks criteria Pts Title page and Abstract 8 marks 8 to >6 Pts Excellent Neat title page with a title that concisely describes the content of review Well-written Abstract covers all relevant findings. Within word limit (150 words) 6 to >4.5 Pts Very good Neat or mostly neat title page with a title that concisely describes the content of review, or possibly slightly too long Abstract covers all or most relevant findings. Within word limit (150 words) 4.5 to >3.0 Pts Good Mostly neat title page with a title that describes the content of review, but clumsy or possibly too long Abstract covers most or > 2/3 of the relevant findings. May be slightly too short or too long. 3.0 to >1.5 Pts Fair Untidy title page with a title that poorly describes the content of review, or title is clumsy or too long Abstract fails to cover the main findings; or it may greatly exceed the word limit (150 words). 1.5 to >0 Pts Unsatisfactory Untidy title page with a title that poorly describes the content of review, or missing Abstract fails to cover the main findings; or it may be missing altogether. 8 pts Introduction 15 marks 15 to >13 Pts Excellent Introduces the topic and provides good context Includes all relevant information; does not exceed 250 words States what report will cover (indicates intent) 13 to >11 Pts Very good Introduces the topic and provides good context Includes mostly relevant information, no or few omissions; does not exceed 250 words States what report will cover (indicates intent) 11 to >8.0 Pts Good Introduces the topic but provides only limited context Includes mostly relevant information, some omissions; or may exceed 250 words States what report will cover (indicates intent) 8.0 to >4.0 Pts Fair Introduces the topic, but fails to provide any context Much irrelevant information with major omissions; either too short, or too long May fail to state what report will cover (omits intent) 4.0 to >0 Pts Unsatisfactory Does not introduce topic and fails to provide any context Contains mostly irrelevant or misleading information; or far too short or missing. May fail to state what report will cover (omits intent) 15 pts 3 Criteria Marks criteria Pts Main paragraphs Marks (Pts) shown are inclusive for items shown in bold for each of the report topics (1-4), i.e. What you should include in your report. Maximum 1000 words 60 marks 60 to >50 Pts Excellent All paragraphs have a well- defined focus and items in bold are all covered All sentences are coherent and logical with good idea development and interpretation of data High quality research (database searching) 50 to >40 Pts Very good Most or all paragraphs have a well-defined focus and/or items in bold are well covered, or mostly covered Most sentences are coherent and logical with good idea development and interpretation but some omissions or mistakes High to good quality research (database searching) 40 to >25 Pts Good Most paragraphs have a well-defined focus and items in bold are adequately reviewed but a few key points are missing Most sentences are coherent and logical but only basic idea development and interpretation with some mistakes and/or omissions Good quality research (database searching) 25 to >10 Pts Fair Most paragraphs lack a defined focus, and some are irrelevant, with only rudimentary coverage of items in bold Most sentences are coherent or logical, but poor idea development and there are major omissions and/or mistakes in interpretation Fair quality research (some database searching) 10 to >0 Pts Unsatisfactory Most or all paragraphs lack a defined focus or are irrelevant, and only rudimentary coverage of items in bold Most or all sentences are incoherent or illogical, no idea development plus major omissions and mistakes in interpretation Poor quality research (little or no database searching) 60 pts Conclusion Maximum 100 words 8 marks 8 to >6.0 Pts Excellent Clear well-presented conclusions Correct length or may be slightly too long or too short (approx. 100 words) No new facts, ideas or arguments are introduced 6.0 to >3.0 Pts Very Good to Good Clear well-presented conclusions Correct length or may be slightly too long or too short (approx. 100 words) May introduce new facts or ideas or arguments not covered in main body of text 3.0 to >0 Pts Fair to Unsatisfactory Conclusions not well-presented Significantly too long or too short with important information missed May introduce new facts or ideas or arguments not covered in main body of text 8 pts 4 Criteria Marks criteria Pts References and overall standard References (4) Overall standard (5) 9 marks 9.0 to >7.5 Pts Excellent At least 8 references correctly cited in text and formatted Correct English grammar and spelling with good scientific writing Excellent use of tables and figures with informative legends correctly placed; tables and figures referred to in the text 7.5 to >6.0 Pts Very good At least 8 references correctly cited in text and formatted Correct English grammar and spelling with good scientific writing Very good use of tables and figures with informative legends mostly correctly placed; tables and figures referred to in the text 6.0 to >4.5 Pts Good At least 8 references correctly cited in text and formatted, or some incorrectly cited or formatted Reasonable English grammar and spelling with reasonable scientific writing Good use of tables and figures with generally informative legends; some may be incorrectly placed or not referred to in the text 4.5 to >2 Pts Fair At least 8 references, but many are incorrectly cited in text or not at all, and may be incorrectly formatted English grammar and spelling only fair, with poor scientific writing Tables and figures absent; or where included legends are inadequate and/or misplaced; most or all are not referred to in the text 2 to >0 Pts Unsatisfactory Fewer than 8 references, and/or very poor formatting, and/or references are not cited in text Poor English grammar and spelling, writing makes no sense or inappropriate for scientific report Tables and figures usually absent (none included) 9pts Total points: 100 This assignment is worth 20 % of the overall course mark. ONPS2374 FOOD MICROBIOLOGY: (POSTGRADUATE CLASS) ASSIGNMENT 4 2022 Below are four different topics that have been selected from over 30 planned Special Issues of the journal Microorganisms, to be published over the next 12 months. Choose any ONE of these four topics for writing a minireview (1500 words). Information from
Answered 1 days AfterOct 25, 2022

Answer To: ONPS2374 FOOD MICROBIOLOGY GUIDELINES AND MARKING RUBRIC: POSTGRADUATE WRITTEN REPORT 2022...

Uzma answered on Oct 26 2022
57 Votes
Seafood-Borne Pathogens
Abstract
Seafood contamination is one of the major issues most of countries are facing nowadays. It is due to poor handling practices, and lack of proper temperature control leading to food-borne disorders. It has become one of the major causes of mortality owing to its high demand for consumption. Seafood contamination is mostly through various food-borne p
athogens including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and algae. To achieve safety in seafood consumption it is important to detect, identify, and monitor those sea food-borne pathogens. Rapid detection of seafood pathogens based on nucleic acids, antigen–antibody, biosensors, and phage methods are in use recently. These methods help to overcome the limitations of conventional pathogen detection methods. Various physico-chemical, biological, and a combination of one or more techniques are utilized to control seafood-borne pathogens. Apart from these proper hygiene, post-harvest, maintenance, handling, and storage can effectively control food-borne pathogens in seafood.
Introduction
Seafood is considered an important source of the most vital nutrients all over the world. Seafood consumption per capita is globally high in recent years. As seafood contains most of the vital nutrients required for human consumption it not only confers health benefits but also helps to minimize the occurrence of various diseases. Naturally occurring pathogens in seawater such as Vibrio, Botulinum, Salmonella, Campylobacter, etc. result in unsafe seafood. It is well known that harvesting, handling, preparation, processing, transportation, and storage of seafood and its products reduce their quality making them unsafe for consumption. There are various prevalent pathogens of major and minor concern. The pathogens associated with food-borne illness are bacteria, viruses, and parasites. The illness caused by these pathogens ranges from mild gastroenteritis to life-threatening disorders. Seafood consumed mostly are the mollusks (e.g., oysters, clams, and mussels), finfish (e.g., salmon and tuna), marine mammals (e.g., seal and whale), fish eggs (roe), and crustaceans (e.g., shrimp, crab, and lobster). While the growing areas are polluted with human waste the seafood is contaminated by various pathogens. Seafood-associated illnesses are most commonly linked to the pollution of the marine environment. This is mainly caused by Calicivirus, Hepatitis A virus, and Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (Tauxe & Pavia., 1998). As there is an increasing demand for seafood worldwide, contamination of fish and seafood products is also increasing. As a reason, seafood exporters are facing a huge loss. This problem should be overcome through proper handling and processing of seafood from harvesting to table (Afreen & Bagdatli., 2021). The current review focuses on the advances in the current methods in the detection of seafood-borne pathogens. Further, control strategies of pathogens in the seafood are briefly discussed.
Detection methods of seafood pathogens
Diseases caused by the consumption of seafood pose a universal threat to the seafood industry, aquaculture, and also to human health. This is because of the pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. The main limitation in seafood pathogen diagnosis and management of the disease is the lack of rapid, and reliable methods of detecting and identifying these pathogens. This further provides an alternative search tool for seafood pathogens diagnostic techniques.
As seafood products are represented as international traded commodities of food, they should exhibit safety along with improved quality. Thus, it is important to manage the safety of seafood to reduce pathogen contamination and transfer to consumers. Therefore, it is vital to detect, identify, and monitor the pathogens responsible...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here