On page 302 I noted that Rosenthal and Rubin showed that an of .1024 actually represented a pretty impressive effect. They demonstrated that this would correspond to a of 20.48, and with 100 subjects...

On page 302 I noted that Rosenthal and Rubin showed that an of .1024 actually represented a pretty impressive effect. They demonstrated that this would correspond to a of 20.48, and with 100 subjects in each of two groups, the 2 3 2 contingency table would have a 34:66 split for one row and a 66:34 split for the other row. a. Verify this calculation with your own 2 3 2 table. b. What would that 2 3 2 table look like if there were 100 subjects in each group, but if the were .0512? (This may require some trial and error in generating tables and computing on each.)