NUR322 Task 3 Marking Criteria Sheet (Rubric) HD D CR P FL Analyse specific practice models and ethics in relation to caring for the child client and their family. Comprehensively incorporates an...

NUR322 Task 3 Marking Criteria Sheet (Rubric) HD D CR P FL Analyse specific practice models and ethics in relation to caring for the child client and their family. Comprehensively incorporates an analysis and adopts a specific or multiple philosophical models and practices ethically in relation to caring for the child client and their family. Analysis is developed. Appreciation of the complexity of care models and ethics are evident in the approach to care. Analysis is evident and the philosophical models and ethics are considered in the paper. The analysis is descriptive. Philosophical models and ethics are only generally considered. No analysis of specific philosophical models and ethics in relation to caring for the child client and their family. Apply age appropriate principles to specific child client service contexts to plan evidence based care. Comprehensively outlines, applies and values the implications of the developmental stage of the adolescent when developing and incorporating nursing care. Considers the implications of the developmental stage of the adolescent when developing and incorporating nursing care. Acknowledges and applies the developmental requirements when caring for the adolescent. Developmental requirements of care of the adolescent are discussed or listed. Does not consider the developmental requirements of the case study client or the discussion is superficial lacking context. Apply knowledge of paediatrics and paediatric services in relation to assessment and assessing care for the child client and their family. Application of assessment and assessing knowledge of a very high standard to identify the potential and actual risks to an adolescent with a chronic health condition and family. Clearly able to articulate advanced decision making processes in determining required care. Applies assessment and assessing knowledge at a high standard, identifying potential and actual risks to an adolescent with a chronic health condition and family. Decision making processes are evident. Applies assessment and assessing knowledge, identifying actual and potential risks to the adolescent with a chronic health condition and family. Able to apply paediatric knowledge to complete an assessment and assess the care required for an adolescent and family. No evidence of developing or incorporating the process of assessment and assessing the care of an adolescent and family. Justify and apply care through critically analysing relevant literature. Care is comprehensively designed, discussed and fully justified with attention to detailed and individual care supported by relevant literature. Care is developed, designed, clearly discussed and justified by supporting relevant literature. Care is discussed with basic developing evidence of justification of nursing care supported by relevant literature. Care is discussed and planned with limited justification supported by relevant literature. Care is not explained, there is no justification of the nursing care or not supported by relevant literature. Clearly communicate research using academic conventions. A high standard of academic communication, word limit adhered to, language accurate for the topic using appropriate citations and structure. High standard of Harvard referencing which conforms to format standards without error. A high standard of academic communication, word limit adhered to, language accurate for the topic using appropriate citations and structure. High standard of Harvard referencing which conforms to format standards. Academic communication, word count adhered to, language accurate for the topic using appropriate citations and structure. High standard of referencing which conforms to Harvard format standards with minimal errors. The case study is clearly communicated using academic conventions. Word limit is adhered to. Referencing conforms to format standards in most cases The case study does not apply correct referencing, or is poorly structured or cannot be understood or the paper has been plagiarised. Grade/Comments: