NewLearningGuide School of Social Sciences and Psychology Disciplines of Social Sciences LEARNING GUIDE XXXXXXXXXXEthics in the Social Sciences 2013-Autumn TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT WEEKLY SCHEDULE...

1 answer below »
NewLearningGuide School of Social Sciences and Psychology Disciplines of Social Sciences LEARNING GUIDE 101555-Ethics in the Social Sciences 2013-Autumn TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT WEEKLY SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................... 2 1.0 UNIT DETAILS, STAFFING, AND HELP ................................................................................ 3 1.1 Unit details ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 What to do if you need help? .......


Document Preview:

NewLearningGuide School of Social Sciences and Psychology Disciplines of Social Sciences LEARNING GUIDE © University of Western Sydney, 2012 Template Designer: Adelma M. Hills Template Author: Martin Daly 101555-Ethics in the Social Sciences 2013-Autumn TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT WEEKLY SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................... 2 1.0 UNIT DETAILS, STAFFING, AND HELP ................................................................................ 3 1.1 Unit details ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 What to do if you need help? ............................................................................................ 3 2.0 UNIT CONTENT ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Handbook summary .......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Unit content ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Mode of delivery ............................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Attendance requirements and workload .......................................................................... 4 2.5 Changes to unit in response to student feedback ............................................................. 4 3.0 UNIT LEARNING OUTCOMES ............................................................................................ 4 4.0 HOW DO ACTIVITIES AND ASSESSMENTS RELATE TO LEARNING OUTCOMES? ................. 5 5.0 ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 5 6.0 TEXTBOOK(S) AND...



Answered Same DayDec 22, 2021

Answer To: NewLearningGuide School of Social Sciences and Psychology Disciplines of Social Sciences LEARNING...

David answered on Dec 22 2021
122 Votes
1 | P a g e

Assessment 2
Consequentialist and Non-consequentialist views of morality
The theories of morality can be broadly divided into two types – consequentialist theories
of
morality and nonconsequentialist theories of morality. The consequentialist views of morality
fundamentally maintain that “the consequences of an action are all that matter for the purposes of
moral evaluation” (Shaw, n.d.). In other words a “consequentialist theory judges the rightness or
wrongness of an action based on the consequences that action has” (Holsinger, 2011). The
nonconsequentialist views of morality, on the other hand, differ from the consequentialist views
because according to the nonconsequentialist views of morality “consequences should not enter
into our moral judgments. Actions are to be judged right or good in accordance with other
criteria (intuitions, divine command, etc.)” (“Chapter 3 – Nonconsequentialist Theories of
Morality and Virtue Ethics”, n.d.). In other words the nonconsequentialist views of morality state
that only individual acts and situations count morally because generalization from rules and
principles can be fallacious as every situation is different from other (“Chapter 3 –
Nonconsequentialist Theories of Morality and Virtue Ethics”, n.d.). To explain the difference
between the consequentialist view of morality and the nonconsequentialist view of morality let
us take an example of a politician donating a huge amount of money for the development of a
certain community so that in lieu he can receive the votes of all the members of the concerned
community in the forthcoming election. The consequentialist views of morality will surely
consider this donation as a morally right deed because as a consequence of this donation a large
number of individuals belonging to the community will be benefitted economically and...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here