Netherby plc manufactures a range of camping and leisure equipment, including tents.
It
is
cur
r
ently
experiencing
seve
r
e
quality
cont
r
ol
p
r
oblems
at
its
existing
fully
dep
r
eci-
ated
factory
in
the
south
of
England.
These
di
f
ficulties
th
r
eaten
to
undermine
its
r
eputa-
tion
for
p
r
oducing
high-quality
p
r
oducts.
It
has
r
ecently
been
app
r
oached
by
the
Eu
r
opean
Bank
for
Reconst
r
uction
and
Development,
on
behalf
of
a
tent
manufactu
r
er
in
Hungar
y
,
which
is
seeking
a
UK-based
trading
partner
which
will
import
and
distrib-
ute
its
tents.
Such
a
switch
would
involve
shutting
down
the
existing
tent
manufactur-
ing
operation
in
the
United
Kingdom
and
converting
it
into
a
distribution
depot.
The
estimated
r
est
r
ucturing
costs
of
£5
million
would
be
tax-allowable,
but
would
exert
seri-
ous strains on cash flo
w
.
Importing,
rather
than
manufacturing,
tents
appears
inhe
r
ently
p
r
ofitable,
as
the
buying-in
price,
when
converted
into
sterling,
is
less
than
the
p
r
esent
p
r
oduction
cost.
In
addition,
Nether by
considers
that
the
Hungarian
p
r
oduct
would
r
esult
in
inc
r
eased
sales,
as
the
existing
r
etail
distributors
seem
imp
r
essed
with
the
quality
of
the
samples
which
they
have
been
shown.
It
is
estimated
that
for
a
five-year
contract,
the
annual
cash
flow benefit would be a
r
ound
£2
million p.a. befo
r
e tax.
Howeve
r
,
the
financing
of
the
closu
r
e
and
r
est
r
ucturing
costs
would
involve
ca
r
eful
consideration
of
the
financing
options.
Some
di
r
ectors
a
r
gue
that
dividends
could
be
r
educed,
as
several
competing
companies
have
al
r
eady
done
a
similar
thing,
while
other
di
r
ectors
a
r
gue
for
a
rights
issue.
Alternativel
y
,
the
p
r
oject
could
be
financed
by
an
issue
of long-term loan stock at a fixed rate of 12 per cent.
The
most
r
ecent
Balance
Sheet
shows
£5
million
of
issued
sha
r
e
capital
(par
value
50p),
while
the
market
price
per
sha
r
e
is
cur
r
ently
£3. A
leading
security
analyst
has
r
e-
cently
described
Nether by’s
gearing
ratio
as
‘adventu
r
ous’.
P
r
ofit
after
tax
in
the
year
just ended was
£15
million and dividends of
£10
million we
r
e paid.
Th
e
rat
e
o
f
Corporatio
n
T
a
x
i
s
3
3
pe
r
cent
,
payabl
e
wit
h
a
one-yea
r
dela
y
.
Nether by’
s
r
e-
portin
g
yea
r
coincide
s
wit
h
th
e
calenda
r
yea
r
an
d
th
e
factor
y
wil
l
b
e
close
d
a
t
th
e
yea
r
end.
Closu
r
e
cost
s
woul
d
b
e
incur
r
e
d
shortl
y
befo
r
e
deliverie
s
o
f
th
e
importe
d
p
r
oduc
t
began,
an
d
su
f
ficien
t
stock
s
wil
l
b
e
o
n
han
d
t
o
ove
r
com
e
an
y
initia
l
suppl
y
p
r
oblems
.
Nether by
consider
s
tha
t
i
t
shoul
d
ear
n
a
r
etur
n
o
n
ne
w
investmen
t
o
f
1
5
pe
r
cen
t
p.a
.
ne
t
o
f
al
l
taxes.
Required
(a)
Is the closure of the existing factory financially worthwhile for Nether by?
(b)
Explain
what
is
meant
when
the
capital
market
is
said
to
be
information-e
f
ficient
in
a semi-st
r
ong form.
If
the
stock
market
is
semi-st
r
ong
e
f
ficient
and
without
considering
the
method
of
finance,
calculate
the
likely
impact
of
acceptance
and
announcement
of
the
details
of
this p
r
oject to the market on Nether by’s sha
r
e price.
(c)
Advise
the
Nether by
boa
r
d
as
to
the
r
elative
merits
of
a
rights
issue
rather
than
a
cut
in dividends to finance this p
r
oject.
(d
)
Explain why a rights issue generally results in a fall in the market price of shares. If a rights issue is undertaken, calculate the resulting theoretical ex-rights share price of issue prices of £1 per share and £2 per share, respectively. (You may ignore issue costs.)
(e)
Assuming the restructuring proposal meets expectations, assess the impact of the project on earnings per share if it is financed by a rights issue at an offer price of £2 per share, and loan stock, respectively. (Again, you may ignore issue costs.)
(f)
Briefly consider the main operating risks connected with the investment project, and how Nether by might at- tempt to allow for these.