HSC1200 Introduction to public health –Further/supplementary assessment – ESSAY CRITERIA SHEET Essay topic: Describe and discuss the differences between a focus on clinical ethics and a focus on...

Need to be done perfectly with no reference error



HSC1200 Introduction to public health –Further/supplementary assessment – ESSAY CRITERIA SHEET Essay topic: Describe and discuss the differences between a focus on clinical ethics and a focus on public health ethics, and provide specific examples. Word count: 1000 words Due date: Noon Wednesday 12th of August Formatting: 1.5 line spacing, word document, size 12 font. Please ensure your name and student ID are on your assignment. Task HD D C P N Description of clinical ethics 20 marks □ Principles and practices of clinical ethics described in detail □ Public health terminology defined accurately □ Principles and practices of clinical ethics described well □ Public health terminology defined accurately □ Adequate description of the principles and practices of clinical ethics □ Adequate description of terminology and concepts associated with public health □ Limited description of the principles and practices of clinical ethics□ Minimal description of terminology and concepts associated with public health □ Poor description of the principles and practices of clinical ethics □ Terminology and concepts associated with public health poorly defined Description of public health ethics 20 marks □ Principles and practices of public health ethics described in detail □ Public health terminology defined accurately □ Principles and practices of public health ethics described well □ Public health terminology defined accurately □ Adequate description of the principles and practices of public health ethics □ Adequate description of terminology and concepts associated with public health □ Limited description of the principles and practices of public health ethics □ Minimal description of terminology and concepts associated with public health □ Poor description of the principles and practices of public health ethics □ Terminology and concepts associated with public health poorly defined Analysis of the rationale for the different approaches to clinical and public health ethics. 20 marks □ A thorough and considered analysis of the rationale for clinical and public health ethical approaches. □ Reasonable attempt at analysis of the rationale for clinical and public health ethical approaches. □ Some attempt at analysis of the rationale for clinical and public health ethical approaches. □ Analysis of the rationale for clinical and public health ethical approaches rarely evident. □ Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis of the rationale for clinical and public health ethical approaches. Utilisation of relevant academic sources to demonstrate understanding of clinical and public health ethics □ Excellent use of sources to back up concepts, issues and theories □ Examples are highly relevant and credible □ Appropriate use of sources to back up concepts, issues or theories □ Examples are relevant and credible □ Limited use of sources to back up concepts, issues or theories □ Some examples not relevant or credible □ Sources used to back up concepts, issues or theories are not relevant credible □ Poorly presented or misinterpreted information □ No sources used to back up concepts, issues, or theories □ Poorly presented or misinterpreted information 20 marks □ Highly effective presentation and interpretation of information □ Information is appropriately interpreted and presented □ Some poorly presented or misinterpreted information Essay structure and argument logically organised 10 marks □ Excellent organisation of ideas into introductory, body and concluding paragraphs □ Arguments presented logically and clearly □ Clear links between paragraphs □ Arguments are strongly supported by evidence □ A highly developed and succinct conclusion present □ Essay is clearly organised into appropriate paragraphs □ Arguments are logical □ Mostly clear links between paragraphs □ Arguments are adequately supported by evidence □ A succinct conclusion is present □ Essay mostly organised into paragraphs □ Arguments are mostly accurate □ Arguments do not always logically flow between paragraphs □ Arguments are sometimes supported by little or unreliable evidence □ Conclusion present but overly long or confusing □ Essay not clearly organised into paragraphs □ Arguments are mostly illogical □ Arguments are largely unsubstantiated □ Conclusion present but unclear □ Essay lacks structure □ Arguments are illogical □ Arguments lack evidence □ No concluding statement Appropriate use of academic language, accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation, professional presentation and correct acknowledgement of sources referenced using APA 6th style 10 marks □ A range of discipline- specific language used throughout □ Written in third person (except for personal examples) □ Academic tone correctly demonstrated and consistent □ No errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation □ All sources are acknowledged □ Correct use of APA 6th referencing style □ Discipline-specific language used □ Written in third person (except for personal examples) □ Academic tone mostly correctly demonstrated □ Good use of paraphrasing □ No errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation □ All sources are acknowledged □ Correct use of APA 6th referencing style □ Mainly discipline- specific language used □ Mostly written in third person (except for personal examples) □ Reasonable ability to paraphrase ideas □ Academic tone demonstrated, but inconsistent □ Few errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation □ All sources are acknowledged □ Mostly correct use of APA 6th referencing style □ Mostly lay language used □ At times written in first person □ Attempted use of academic tone □ Random or excessive use of quotations □ Paraphrasing skills require development to avoid plagiarism □ Several errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation □ Partial acknowledgement of sources □ Attempted use of APA 6th referencing style □ Lay language used □ Written in first person □ Academic tone not demonstrated □ Excessive use of quotations □ Plagiarism evident □ Substantial errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation □ Incorrect acknowledgement of sources □ Referencing does not conform with APA 6th referencing style Student name: Grade: