My proposal was about a opening an extension to homeless shelter program providing housing and financial readiness programs attached below is a rubric for the paper and my proposal for the organization
here's an outline example from the tutor to show how the paper should flow
Writing Rubric Writing Rubric Quality Criteria No/Limited Proficiency 0-2pts Some Proficiency 3pts Proficiency 4pts High Proficiency 5pts 1. Program Description: (a) Clarity of mission and purpose Reader cannot determine mission & purpose OR material has no relation to the writing task. Mission & purpose are somewhat vague OR only loosely related to the writing task. Mission and vision are fairly clear and match the writing task. Mission and vision are very clear; and closely match the writing task, and provide fresh insight. 2. Organization of paragraphs/paper Unclear organization OR organizational plan is inappropriate to thesis. No transitions. Transitions are abrupt, illogical, and ineffective. Paper is difficult to follow. Transitions are generally appropriate. However, sequence of ideas could be improved. Sequence of ideas is effective. Transitions are smooth and effective. 3. Support/ Reasoning: (a) Ideas (b) Details Offers simplistic, undeveloped, or cryptic support for ideas; Inappropriate or off-topic generalizations, faulty assumptions, errors of fact. Offers some support that may be vague. Details are too general, not interpreted, irrelevant to thesis, or inappropriately repetitive Offers solid but less original reasoning. Assumptions are not always recognized or made explicit. Contains some appropriate details or examples Substantial, logical, & concrete description and support. Assumptions are made explicit. Details are germane, original, and convincingly interpreted 4. Use of sources: Documentation Fails to use sources AND/OR overuse of quotations or paraphrase AND/OR uses source material without acknowledgement. No peer-reviewed sources Uses relevant sources but substitutes them for the writer’s own ideas. Quotations & paraphrases too long and/or inconsistently referenced. Some but not all sources are peer-reviewed Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, the writer’s own development of idea. Doesn’t overuse quotes, but may not always conform to required style manual. All sources peer-reviewed Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Skillfully combines material from a variety of sources. All five sources peer-reviewed 5. Writing Conventions: Grammar/Spelling/ Usage/Punctuation Mechanical & usage errors so severe that writer’s ideas are difficult to understand Repeated weaknesses in mechanics and usage. Pattern of flaws Grammar and syntax are correct with very few errors in spelling or punctuation. Essentially error free. Evidence of superior control of diction * Based in part on a rubric by Barbara Walvoord, in B. Walvoord & V. Johnson Anderson, Effective Grading, 1998