Security personnel generally have two goals when using a honeypot. A honeypot can deflect or redirect threat actors’ attention away from legitimate servers by encouraging them to spend their time and energy on the decoy server, distracting their attention from the data on the actual server. A honeypot can also trick threat actors into revealing their attack techniques. Once these techniques are discovered, it can then be determined if actual production systems could thwart such an attack. However, honeypots can introduce risk. A honeypot, once attacked and compromised, could be used as a launching pad to attack and infiltrate other systems, either those of the organization itself or another organization. Although honeypots should be designed to “capture” the threat actor a misconfiguration could inadvertently give an attacker an actual platform to attack other systems. If a threat actor were able to do this, would the organization that set up the honeypot then be liable?
Post a discussion (minimum of 100 words) of your thoughts about the questions whether the advantages of a honeypot outweigh its disadvantages, and if a compromised honeypot would create a liability for that organization. Then respond to two of your classmates’s threads with posts of at least 50 words discussing their comments and ideas. Try to ask open-ended questions and encourage discussion. Remember to respond to other students who post on your thread. Be sure to use complete sentences and check your grammar, spelling, and punctuation before making a submission.
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here