Module 5 Discussion Recall Clifford’s argument for evidentialism in Module 1. Pascal, James, and Bergmann all break sharply with Clifford’s evidentialist conclusions, but what, if anything, do...

Module 5 Discussion Recall Clifford’s argument for evidentialism in Module 1. Pascal, James, and Bergmann all break sharply with Clifford’s evidentialist conclusions, but what, if anything, do they say to help abate Clifford’s main worry, namely, that belief without evidence often leads to trouble? Is it ever okay to believe something without evidence when acting on that belief could possibly have a negative impact on the welfare of others? Why or why not?As always, please work with your classmates to construct an extended academic discussion on the issues these questions engage and please make sure that you are open to learning from perspectives and assessments that differ from your own.