Essay
MIS303_Assessment 1_Brief_Essay_Module 2.2 Page 1 of 6 Task Summary Write an essay applying your knowledge of professional ethics, traditional theories in ethics (as covered in Module 1), ethical issues that arise in business, and the relationship between culture and professional ethics. Context In Modules 1 and 2, you learnt about issues related to professional ethics in the information systems (IS) industry. You also learnt about traditional theories related to professional ethics and its relationship with culture. You will now have an opportunity to debate and explore core issues relating to how traditional theories of professional ethics can be demonstrated – such as in the specific application of industry codes of ethics or in specific behaviours or actions as an IS professional. Task Instructions Write a 750-word essay on ‘Professional ethics in the information systems industry: A discussion about issues, cultures and traditional theories’ Please refer to the Assessment Rubric to ensure you address all the assessment criteria. ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS303 Professional Ethics Assessment Essay Individual/Group Individual Length 750 words (+/-10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Identify and explain how codes of ethics directly impact professional practice and behaviour in the IS profession. Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2.2 Weighting 25% Total Marks 100 MIS303_Assessment 1_Brief_Essay_Module 2.2 Page 2 of 6 Suggested Essay Format Introduction (75-100 words) • Provide background information regarding the topic. Identify professional ethics specific to the information systems industry and the related ethical issues. Body (450-550 words) • Using evidence-based analysis, discuss the relationship of professional ethics and culture in the information systems (IS) industry. • Discuss and analyse the application of traditional theories of ethics to the information system industry. Conclusion (75-100 words) • Provide a conclusion of your critical analysis. Link the conclusion back to your introduction. References Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research or images used as required. All referencing must be in accordance with the university’s APA Referencing and Academic Writing Guide. For more information on referencing, go to http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Submission Instructions Please submit ONE Word document (.doc or .docx) via the Assessment 1 link in the main navigation menu of MIS303: Professional Ethics in the Blackboard portal. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Due date: 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2.2. Academic Integrity The work you submit for this assessment task must be your own and align with the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. Before submission, please make sure you have read and are aware of this policy, viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies- and-forms. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms MIS303_Assessment 1_Brief_Essay_Module 2.2 Page 3 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Questions Fail 0-49% Pass 50-64% Credit 65-74% Distinction 75-84% High Distinction85- 100% Objectivity 10% Discussion in the essay is subjective/one-sided. Unable to demonstrate an understanding of how to discuss the topic objectively Discussion in the essay demonstrates some objectivity, but is still largely subjective Some attempts made to present an objective discussion, but predominantly presents subjective opinions throughout Discussion in the essay largely objective, but can still show more depth Demonstrates some ability to discuss the topic objectively, however the discussion is lacking in depth and is often subjective Discussion in the essay is objective and balanced Demonstrates the ability to discuss the topic in a balanced and objective manner Demonstrates the ability to objectively discuss professional ethics in the information systems industry in a balanced and in-depth manner. Focus of the Essay 10% The discussion is unfocused and unclear Demonstrates some ability to apply focus to the discussion, but often lacks clarity and balance Demonstrates a proficient ability to apply focus and balance throughout most of the discussion, with opportunities for growth Demonstrates an advanced ability to apply focus and balance throughout the discussion Demonstrates an expert ability to apply focus and balance throughout the discussion Analytical skill 10% Does not understand the given topic Has hardly analysed the given topic Demonstrates a proficient ability to analyse the topic Demonstrates an advanced ability to analyse the topic confidently Demonstrates an expert ability to confidently and critically analyse the topic Evidence of knowledge of the subject 10% The content of the essay indicates that self-study and/or learning activities have not been completed The content of the essay indicates that some self- study and/or learning activities have been completed The content of the essay indicates that self-study and learning activities have been completed The content of the essay indicates that self-study and learning activities have been completed The content of the essay indicates that self-study and learning activities have been completed MIS303_Assessment 1_Brief_Essay_Module 2.2 Page 4 of 6 Assessment Questions Fail 0-49% Pass 50-64% Credit 65-74% Distinction 75-84% High Distinction85- 100% Limited or no knowledge of the topic Demonstrates basic knowledge of the topic Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the topic Demonstrates advanced knowledge of the topic Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of the topic and has applied this knowledge in the writing of the essay Presentation of Arguments 15% Argument is not clear Argument is stated, but is basic and not explained Argument is stated and is adequately explained Argument is clearly stated and is thoughtful and well explained Argument is clearly stated and is thoughtful, complex, and thoroughly explained Presentation of Conclusion 15% Viewpoint is not explained, and the conclusion is not relevant to the topic Attempts to explain viewpoint and make the conclusion relevant to the topic Viewpoint is adequately explained, and the conclusion is relevant to the topic Viewpoint is proficiently explained, and the conclusion is relevant to the topic Viewpoint is comprehensively explained, and the conclusion is relevant to the topic Structure of the Essay 5% Essay does not adhere to the given format Essay does not have introduction, body paragraph and conclusion Essay barely adheres to the given format Essay has introduction and conclusion. Body paragraphs are not clear Essay largely adheres to the given format Essay has an introduction, body paragraph and conclusion Essay adheres to the given format Essay has a clear introduction, conclusion and at least two body paragraphs Essay completely adheres to the given format Essay has a clear introduction, conclusion and at least two body paragraphs. Paragraphs have topic sentences. Conclusion clearly summarises the point of the essay MIS303_Assessment 1_Brief_Essay_Module 2.2 Page 5 of 6 Assessment Questions Fail 0-49% Pass 50-64% Credit 65-74% Distinction 75-84% High Distinction85- 100% Effective Communication (Written) 15% Specialised language and terminology are rarely or inaccurately employed Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Communicates in a readable manner Attempts to employ specialised language and terminology with accuracy Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Communicates in a coherent and readable manner Accurately employs specialised language and terminology Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are sequenced clearly and logically. Occasional minor errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Communicates coherently Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive Spelling, grammar and/or punctuation are free from errors Communicates eloquently. Expresses meaning coherently, concisely, and creatively. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology. Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are insightful, persuasive, and expertly presented