Price please
MIS302_Supplementary T3 2021 Task Summary For this Supplementary you will write a report which will cover the following areas: 1. Agile Values & Principles a. The second value of the Agile Manifesto states: “Working software over comprehensive documentation”. Why did the writers of the Manifesto say this? b. Looking at the sixth principle of the Agile Manifesto: “The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation”. Name and describe two face-to-face requirements elicitation techniques that you can use as a business analyst to best capture user requirements. 2. Agile Role (Refer to Aguanno, K., & Schibi, O. (2018). Agile business analysis: Enabling continuous improvement of requirements, project scope and Agile project SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis Assessment Report Individual/Group Individual Length 2000 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Analyse organisational requirements as they apply to agile environments. b) Apply methods of documenting, maintaining and measuring requirements to meet organisational needs c) Identify, select and validate requirements to maximise effectiveness in organisations and promote sustainable business practices. d) Communicate agile methods, processes and approaches with stakeholders in order to address organisational requirements. Submission By deadline set by Academic Services Weighting 50% Pass/ Fail Total Marks Supplementary Pass (50%) or Fail (original grade) MIS302_Supplementary T3 2021 results [e-book]. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest- com.ezproxy.laureate.net.au/lib/think/reader.action?docID=5762202&ppg=104 a. Aguanno & Schibbi detail 7 bullets points of how a BA adds value in an Agile team. Identify and describe 4 tools that the Agile BA can use to achieve the listed benefits (it is advised that you use graphical representation of these tools as far as possible). 3. Agile Requirements Engineering (Refer Girvan, L., & Paul, D. (2017). Agile and business analysis: Practical guidance for IT professionals [e-book]. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.laureate.net.au/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nleb k&AN=1426600&site=ehost-live&authtype=ip,sso&custid=ns251549&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_145 4. Compare the graphic on p 151 - Figure 10.4 Traditional approach to requirements engineering and the graphic on p 153 - Figure 10.5 - An Agile approach to eliciting requirements. a. Identify what you think are the three most important differences that are represented in these graphics. b. Describe these differences and explain why you believe they are important. c. Acceptance Criteria (Refer Wick, A. (2017, March 4). Acceptance criteria [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/learning/agile-product- owner-role-techniques/acceptance-criteria?u=2104756 - and - Wick, A. (2019, August 27). Work the acceptance criteria [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/learning/agile-analysis-weekly-tips/work-the- acceptance-criteria?u=2104756Who decides on the Acceptance Criteria - why do you think that this is the case? d. From whose perspective should the Acceptance Criteria be written? e. What is the Gherkin technique? Describe the technique and create an example of your own to demonstrate your understanding. f. Prioritisation (Girvan, L., & Paul, D. (2017). Agile and business analysis: Practical guidance for IT professionals. Swindon, UK: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.laureate.net.au/login.aspx?direct=true& db=nlebk&AN=1426600&site=ehost- live&authtype=ip,sso&custid=ns251549&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_130. Describe the MoSCoW technique and explain how it can be used for Backlog prioritisation. While we have given you targeted readings- you are required to find at least one additional resource to support your research for each question. The use of class resources is actively encouraged for additional references. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context The aim of this assessment is to introduce students to Agile practice and activities in a business context, which serves as a foundation for the rest of the subject. MIS302_Supplementary T3 2021 Task Instructions To complete this assessment task, you must: 1. Review your subject notes, essential readings, and learning activities to ensure that you are well prepared for the assignment. 2. Create a report plan and identify all the key components that will be required in your report to meet the assessment brief requirements. 3. Refer to the Assessment Rubric to ensure that you address all the assessment criteria. Report Structure The report is brief and therefore will not require and executive summary or abstract. Title page: should include subject ID, subject name, assignment title, student’s name, student number and lecturer’s name Table of contents: include all key components of this assessment. (This link will show you how to automate the Table of Contents function in Word) Introduction (150-200 words): Also serve as your statement of purpose for the report. This means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in your report. You will need to inform the reader of: 1. Your area of research and its context 2. The key concepts you will be addressing, 3. What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report Body of the report (1300-1500 words): 1. Agile Values & Principles a. The second value of the Agile Manifesto states: “Working software over comprehensive documentation”. Why did the writers of the Manifesto say this? b. Looking at the sixth principle of the Agile Manifesto: “The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation”. Name and describe two face-to-face requirements elicitation techniques that you can use as a business analyst to best capture user requirements. 2. Agile Role a. Identify and describe 4 tools that the Agile BA can use to achieve the listed benefits (it is advised that you use graphical representation of these tools as far as possible). 3. Agile Requirements Engineering MIS302_Supplementary T3 2021 a. Identify what you think are the three most important differences that are represented in the graphics. b. Describe these differences and explain why you believe they are important. 4. Acceptance Criteria a. Who decides on the Acceptance Criteria - why do you think that this is the case? b. From whose perspective should the Acceptance Criteria be written? c. What is the Gherkin technique? Describe the technique and create an example of your own to demonstrate your understanding. 5. Prioritisation a. Describe the MoSCoW technique and explain how it can be used for Backlog prioritisation. Conclusion (150-200 words): summarise any findings or recommendations that the report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report. Layout: • The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, should be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading and page numbers on the bottom of each page. • With the required diagrams due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning. Referencing A minimum of four to six references are required for this assessment, with at least 4 being scholarly or academic sources. An academic source is one that has been peer-reviewed or cited in the past and a scholarly source is written by academics and other experts to contribute to knowledge in a particular field. It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Submission Instructions Please submit ONE Word document (.doc or .docx) via the Supplementary link in the main navigation menu of MIS302 Agile Business Analysis in the Blackboard portal. On successful completion of this assessment, you will only receive a ‘Supplementary Pass’ for the subject. A ‘Failed’ grade for this assessment will lead to a failed grade for the subject. MIS302_Supplementary T3 2021 Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and- forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. Marking The following rubric ill be used as a guide to assist the marker. The Supplementary Assessment will not be given a mark but will be graded a Supplementary Pass or Fail. A Pass results in a maximum of 50% Final Grade for the subject, and a Fail results in no change to the standing Final Grade mark prior to the Supplementary Assessment being offered. MIS302_Supplementary T3 2021 Page 6 of 8 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding Understanding of the key concepts of Agile values and principles, roles, requirements engineering, acceptance criteria and prioritisation. 40% Lack of understanding of the required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Lack of application, and analysis of information to provide clear recommendations. Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Some of the key components of the assignment are not addressed. Limited application and analysis to provide clear recommendations. Adequate knowledge or understanding of the required concepts. A reasonable capacity to explain and apply relevant key concepts. Supports opinion and information substantiated by evidence from research to provide recommendations. Thorough understanding of the key concepts. Discriminates between assertion of opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course