Price please
MIS203_Assessment_2_Brief_Literature Review_Due Module 3.2 Page 1 of 8 ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS203: Micro-services Architecture Cloud and Web IS Assessment Assessment 2: Literature Review Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Identify and explore the key elements and applications of successful applications of microservice, cloud computing, web-based information systems Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 3.2 (Week 6). Weighting 15% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary In this assessment, you are required to conduct a literature review on a selected area of microservice architectures, cloud computing or web-based information systems (WBIS). Context Literature is a collection of written works (e.g. books and journal articles of academic value) related to a particular topic or field of research. It explains how knowledge has evolved within that topic or field - highlighting what is generally accepted, what has already been done, what is the current state of thinking and what is emerging. A literature review identifies, evaluates, and summarises the relevant literature within a particular topic or field of research. This assessment demonstrates your understanding of the key elements and applications of microservice architectures, cloud computing or WBIS through a review of the literature related to the selected topic or field of research. MIS203_Assessment_2_Brief_Literature Review_Due Module 3.2 Page 2 of 8 Task Instructions To complete this assessment task, you must: 1. Review your course notes to establish a relevant area of investigation in microservice architectures, cloud computing or WBIS. Some of the areas that you may wish to select include, but not limited to: • Private cloud security • Public cloud security • Hybrid cloud security • Cloud replication and recovery • Journey from IaaS to SaaS • Serverless cloud architecture • Service-oriented architecture • Journey from Monolith to Microservices • Deployment architectures in cloud • Migration from on-premises to cloud • Applications and/or architecture of WBIS • Emerging role of WBIS web services frameworks 2. Re-read any relevant readings that have been recommended for the course. 3. Perform additional research and investigation and ensure that you have at least 10 sources which will add value to your review of the literature pertaining to the selected area of investigation. 4. Plan how you will structure your ideas for your literature review. Structure and Format Please write a 1500-word literature review of a selected area in microservice architectures, cloud computing or WBIS: Title page Should include the subject code and subject name, assignment title, student’s name and student number, and the Learning Facilitator’s name. Executive summary (200-250 words – not included in the word count) Summarise the key points presented in the literature review. This should restate the purpose of the literature review, highlight the major points of the review, and describe any results, conclusions, or recommendations from the review. Introduction (100-150 words) Provide a rationale for the literature review including a purpose statement and the scope of the review (i.e. what aspects of the topic or field of research will be discussed). Explain how the review will be organised and provide statement(s) about the overall findings. Body (1000-1200 words) Provide the purpose and finding(s) for each source reviewed. Critically analyse the sources – identify the strengths and issues such as weaknesses, gaps, and contradictions. Provide examples to support the points raised through the review. MIS203_Assessment_2_Brief_Literature Review_Due Module 3.2 Page 3 of 8 Conclusion (100-150 words) Provide an overall perspective on the topic or field of research. Identify any gap(s) within the literature reviewed and suggest possible area(s) for further research. References List the sources referred to in the literature review according to APA Referencing style. Appendix (if any) The appendix will contain supporting information/documentation for the data/information presented in the literature review. To achieve a grade higher than a pass you must compile accurate and complete documentation in presenting a comprehensive literature review. Report Format and Layout a. The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, should be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading and page numbers on the bottom of each page. b. If diagrams or tables are used, due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning. Further information on conducting and writing literature review can be found at: https://laureate- au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_24 98861_1&mode=reset Referencing There are requirements for referencing this report using APA referencing style. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing a. It is expected that you reference any course notes, readings, and further research. b. You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment. This rubric will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like. Submission Instructions Please submit ONE MSWord document (.doc or .docx) via the Assessment 2 section found in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498861_1&mode=reset https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498861_1&mode=reset https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498861_1&mode=reset http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing MIS203_Assessment_2_Brief_Literature Review_Due Module 3.2 Page 4 of 8 Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I are submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms MIS203_Assessment_2_Brief_Literature Review_Due Module 3.2 Page 5 of 8 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% REPORT - Visual appeal and presentation of content Title page Font, spacing and format are in accordance with the requirements of the assignment brief Appropriate use of paragraphs, sentence construction, spelling, and grammar Adheres to the word count requirement 10% • No title page is included. • Incorrect font and size are used with poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination, or tables or diagrams run over onto the next page unnecessarily. • Report is written as a block of text with no breaks in between ideas. Separate ideas cannot be clearly discerned. • Many errors in spelling or grammar obscure meaning of what student has written. • Does not adhere to the word count requirement of 1500 words (greater than +/- 20%) • Title page is included but is missing most information. • Incorrect font and size are used, or poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination. • Paragraphs are used but large blocks of text with long sentences make it difficult to understand the ideas being conveyed. • Spelling or grammar has errors but meaning remains clear. • Does not adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 20%) • Title page is included but is missing key information. • Some errors in font use and line spacing. Some pagination problems. • One idea or concept per paragraph. Some paragraphs could be more succinctly written. • Minor spelling or grammar errors. • Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 10%) • Title page is included with most required information. • Minor errors in font, spacing and format. • One idea or concept per paragraph with 3-4 well constructed sentences per paragraph. • No errors in spelling or grammar. • Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 10%) • Title page is included with all required information. • Font, spacing and format are in accordance with the requirements of the assignment brief. • Expert use of paragraphs with 3-4 well constructed sentences per paragraph which follow logically from each other. • No errors in spelling or grammar. • Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 5%) MIS203_Assessment_2_Brief_Literature Review_Due Module 3.2 Page 6 of 8 REPORT – Meets the assignment brief regarding structure. Introduction outlines the rationale for the literature review, explains how the review will be organised and provide statement(s) about the overall findings. Conclusion provides an overall perspective on the topic or field of research including gaps and suggestions for further research. 20% • No attempt to meet structure requirements. Introduction or conclusion is missing or incomplete. • No rationale for the literature review is included in the introduction. • No explanation on how the literature review will be organised is included in the introduction. • No statement(s) about the overall findings is included in the introduction. • Literature review consists of less than five scholarly sources. • No overall perspective on the topic or field of research is included in the conclusion. • No identified gaps or suggestions for further research are included in the conclusion. • Limited attempt to meet structure requirements. Introduction or conclusion is incomplete. • Limited rationale for the literature review is included in the introduction. • Limited explanation on how the literature review will be organised is included in the introduction. • Limited statement(s) about the overall findings is included in the