Microsoft Word - MITS5507-Assignment_02.docx MITS5507 Assignment 2 MITS5507 Business Process Management Research Report March 2020 MITS5507 Assignment 2 Copyright © XXXXXXXXXXVIT, All Rights Reserved....

1 answer below »
give me by deadline


Microsoft Word - MITS5507-Assignment_02.docx MITS5507 Assignment 2 MITS5507 Business Process Management Research Report March 2020 MITS5507 Assignment 2 Copyright © 2015-2018 VIT, All Rights Reserved. 2 Research Report (Individual Assignment) - 10% (Due week 9) Objective(s) This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to improve student presentation skills and to give students experience in researching a topic and writing a report relevant to the Unit of Study subject matter. INSTRUCTIONS For this component you will prepare a report or critique on an academic paper related to Business Process Modeling or Business Process Management. The paper you select must be directly relevant to one of these major topics. The paper can be from any academic conference or other relevant Journal or online sources such as Google Scholar, Academic department repositories etc... All students must select a different paper, thus the paper must be approved by your instructor or tutor before proceeding. In case two students are wanting to report on the same paper, the first who emails the instructor with their choice will be allocated that paper (provided it is acceptable). Note: popular magazine articles, web sites and blogs are not academic sources. Your report should be limited to approx. 1500 words (not including references). Use 1.5 spacing with a 12 point Times New Roman font. Though your paper will largely be based on the chosen article, you can use other sources to support your discussion. Citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the IEEE style. Your report or critique must include: • Title Page: The title of the assessment, the name of the paper you are reviewing and its authors, and your name and student ID. • Introduction: A statement of the purpose for your report and a brief outline of how you will discuss the selected article (one or two paragraphs). Make sure to identify the article being reviewed. • Body of Report: Describe the intention and content of the article. If it is a research report, discuss the research method (survey, case study, observation, experiment, or other method) and findings. Comment on problems or issues highlighted by the authors. Discuss the conclusions of the article and how they are relevant to what you are MITS5507 Assignment 2 Copyright © 2015-2018 VIT, All Rights Reserved. 3 studying this semester. • Conclusion: A summary of the points you have made in the body of the paper. The conclusion should not introduce any ‘new’ material that was not discussed in the body of the paper. (One or two paragraphs) • References: A list of sources used in your text. They should be listed alphabetically by (first) author’s family name. Follow the IEEE style. • The footer must include your name, student ID, and page number. Resources There are a number of resources you can utilize for finding academic articles and you should make the most of these resources. 1. The VIT Library has access to an extensive array of on-line journals including IEEE and ACM journals. You can access these online Journals through the library’s subscription to the ProQuest platform. You can access this platform by finding the ‘ProQuest academic platform’ link on the StudyBoard@vit home page, towards the bottom of the page in the left column under the heading Resources & Services. 2. Please also refer to the link in the same section on ‘Scholarly Article Searching’. This will show you how to search or articles of the type required for this assignment. 3. In the same section, additionally refer to the link ‘VIT Library Referencing’. This link discusses a number of referencing styles. Different types of Journals will require different styles of referencing and citation, but this assignment requires the IEEE style. Commonly associated with Engineering and Science disciplines. This style is discussed in the document and provides examples and links to further resources. 4. Google Scholar ‘https://scholar.google.com.au/‘ is a separate google search engine that will help you search for scholarly articles (Journal articles and conference papers etc..). It will generally not have access to the resources that Proquest above does as these are usually paid sites. However Google Scholar does index an extremely large amount of scholarly articles located in open access conferences, Journals and academic web sites. Please go through the above notes ‘Scholarly Article Searching’ to find out how to use Google Scholar. MITS5507 Assignment 2 Copyright © 2015-2018 VIT, All Rights Reserved. 4 Submission Guidelines All submissions are to be submitted through turn-it-in. Drop-boxes linked to turn-it-in will be set up in the Unit of Study Moodle account. Assignments not submitted through these drop-boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above) and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be penalized at the rate of 10% per day (including weekend days). The turn-it-in similarity score will be used in determining the level if any of plagiarism. Turn-it-in will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class member submissions for plagiarism. You can see your turn-it-in similarity score when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your assignment and re-submit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed you cannot make re-submissions and you will have to live with the similarity score as there will be no chance for changing. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of this feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please remember we only see the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission. Your document should be a single word or pdf document containing your report. Microsoft Word - JAIS06-179 camera-ready_edits-authors See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27477944 Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis Article  in  Journal of the Association for Information Systems · April 2009 DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00193 · Source: OAI CITATIONS 290 READS 862 4 authors: Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Positive Deviance View project Developing a Theory of Green Information Systems View project Jan Recker University of Cologne 296 PUBLICATIONS   7,121 CITATIONS    SEE PROFILE Michael Rosemann Queensland University of Technology 358 PUBLICATIONS   11,999 CITATIONS    SEE PROFILE Marta Indulska The University of Queensland 113 PUBLICATIONS   3,088 CITATIONS    SEE PROFILE Peter Green Queensland University of Technology 128 PUBLICATIONS   3,629 CITATIONS    SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Jan Recker on 29 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27477944_Business_Process_Modeling-_A_Comparative_Analysis?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27477944_Business_Process_Modeling-_A_Comparative_Analysis?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_3&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/project/Positive-Deviance-2?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_9&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/project/Developing-a-Theory-of-Green-Information-Systems?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_9&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_1&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Recker?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_4&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Recker?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_5&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Cologne?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_6&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Recker?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_7&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Rosemann2?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_4&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Rosemann2?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_5&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Queensland_University_of_Technology?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_6&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Rosemann2?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_7&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marta_Indulska?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_4&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marta_Indulska?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_5&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/institution/The_University_of_Queensland?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_6&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marta_Indulska?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_7&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Green13?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_4&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Green13?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_5&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Queensland_University_of_Technology?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_6&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Green13?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_7&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Recker?enrichId=rgreq-d9babcfb7873fd1fbcb589154a1bd5fc-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI3NDc3OTQ0O0FTOjEwMjE4MzkyODMzNjM4NUAxNDAxMzczOTU1NDky&el=1_x_10&_esc=publicationCoverPdf Volume 10 Issue4 Article 2 Jo ur na l o f t he A ss oc ia tio n fo r In fo rm at io n Sy st em s Research Article Abstract Jan Recker Faculty of Science and Technology Queensland University of Technology [email protected] Michael Rosemann Faculty of Science and Technology Queensland University of Technology [email protected] Many business process modeling techniques have been proposed over the last decades, creating a demand for theory to assist in the comparison and evaluation of these techniques. A widely established way of determining the effectiveness and efficiency of modeling techniques is by way of representational analysis. This paper comparatively assesses representational analyses of 12 popular process modeling techniques in order to provide insights into the extent to which they differ from each other. We discuss several implications of our findings. Our analysis uncovers and explores representational root causes for a number of shortcomings that remain in process modeling practice, such as lack of process decomposition and integration of business rule specification. Our findings also serve as motivation and input to future research in areas such as context-aware business process design and conventions management. Keywords: Business process management, Process modeling, Representation theory, BWW model Volume 10, Issue 4, pp. 333-363, April 2009 Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis* * Yair Wand was the accepting senior editor. Joerg Evermann, Andreas Opdahl, and Pnina Soffer were the reviewers. This article was submitted on January 9, 2006 and went through two revisions. Marta Indulska UQ Business School The University of Queensland [email protected] Peter Green UQ Business School The University of Queensland [email protected] Journal of the Association for Information Systems Vol. 10 Issue 4 pp. 333-363 April 2009 334 Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis 1. Introduction Business process management (BPM) continues to be a top business priority, and building business process capability is still a major challenge for senior executives(Gartner Group, 2009). The interest in BPM has, inter alia, triggered substantial academic and commercial work aiming toward advanced business process management solutions. One prominent example in this context is increasingly popular business process modeling (Davies et al., 2006). Due to a strengthened interest in a more disciplined approach to business process management, many organizations have made significant investments in process modeling initiatives, which in turn have triggered substantial related research
Answered Same DayMay 07, 2021MITS5507

Answer To: Microsoft Word - MITS5507-Assignment_02.docx MITS5507 Assignment 2 MITS5507 Business Process...

Kuldeep answered on May 08 2021
158 Votes
Business process management
Student ID:
Student Name:
Unit name:
Date:
Contents
Introduction    2
Critique on an academic paper    2
Intention and content of the article    2
Problems or issues highlighted by the authors    2
Conclusions of the article    3
Methodology    3
Relevancy to my study    4
Conclusion    5
Introduction
Business process management (BPM) is still a main con
cern, while building business procedure capabilities remains the main challenge for senior managers. In this case, a prominent example is increasingly well known business process modeling. As people are increasingly interested in more rigorous BPM methods, most of the associations have invested heavily in the process modeling programs, which has led to a large number of related studies. For example, recently enacted legislation (such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) has further promoted interest in BPM as a manner to document organizational processes. In the past few decades, a lot of BPM methods have been planned, which put forward requirements on the theory to help compare and evaluate these methods. A broadly established method to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of modeling methods is through representation analysis.
Critique on an academic paper
Intention and content of the article
This article compares and evaluates a representative analysis of 12 well known process modeling methods to provide different degrees of understanding of everybody [1]. Author discussed a few of implications. Our analysis found and discussed the representative roots of many deficiencies that still exist in the process modeling practices, for example the lack of the process decomposition as well as integration of the business rule specifications.
Problems or issues highlighted by the authors
When considering how to model business processes, deciding the kind of symbol (or technology) to use for modeling process is a significant consideration. People may select to utilize structured analysis symbols and object-oriented methods. Therefore, a significant aspect of considering specific technologies is that a different technology has different abilities to express the real process domain [2]. A different modeling method tends to emphasize various aspects of the process, for example resource allocation, activity sequencing, communication, as well as organizational responsibilities. Although this observation seem obvious, it’s necessary to know why these differences exists moreover what they mean. In addition, because it is mainly practice-driven, the existing process modeling method often lack formal theoretical basis, and the differences between these methods can be studied on this basis. Therefore, theoretical framework is needed to facilitate this explanation. General, although it is generally believed that the lack of a quality framework to build conceptual models is crucial, in the past few years, representation-based theories have emerged as a promising foundation [3]. Therefore, to address this critical gap, author utilize representation theory
Conclusions of the article
The results of this research may be of interest to users and developers of the process modeling methods. Developers must be motivated to examine the representative analysis of availblable process modeling technologies to build on these technologies and mitigate some weaknesses in new development or extension technologies. The outcomes will encourage users or clients to consider the integrity of the ontology and the clarity of the ontology as potential evaluation criteria for choosing appropriate modeling techniques. Our findings indicate that the latest process modeling methods provide a fairly huge coverage, which indicates that they have a high degree...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here