Slide 6 week 8
Microsoft Word - From UC_SBM4201 Bahareh_SBM4201_Assessment Brief-T2-2020 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Unit Code and Title: SBM4201 Systems Analysis and Design Assessment Overview Assessment Task Weighting Due Length ULO Assessment 1: Case Study -1 Covers the following topics Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC), Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), PERT/CPM chart, NPV, ROI and payback period 30% Week 5 2500 words ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 Assessment 2: Case Study -2 Covers the following topics: use case diagram, ER diagram Class diagram, Sequence diagram, Activity diagram, user and system interfaces, and system testing, deployment and maintenance and 30% Week 12 2500 words ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 ULO4 Assessment 3: Project Design Every two weeks exercises assess students’ ability to understand theoretical materials 40% Weekly N/A ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 ULO4 ULO5 Assessment 1: Case Study-1 Due date: Week 5 Group/individual: Group Word count / Time provided: 2500 words Weighting: 30% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3 Assessment Details: In this assignment, you have to perform a system analysis and design for the Nuk Restaurant System (NRS) case study provided at the case study section. Case Study: Nuk Restaurant System (NRS) The Nuk is a restaurant that opened in 2020 after its owners, Mala and Ashli, graduated from university. Both determined to open their restaurant in Sydney. They realize that they can be successful by collecting, analysing, and using the data that is available to them. Therefore, Nuk aims Assessment Details Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D to collect data from their customers in a way that they can keep individual sales, loyal customers, the most popular food, or drink. For this purpose, customers require to create an account before their first visit to Nuk restaurant. The Information records on the online system consist of first and last name, residential address, city, zip code, mobile number, and email address. For digital purposes, a unique identification number is created for each customer. If the customers face any issues for creating an account or reserving a table, the advisor needs to support them. In this case, the online system needs to record the assigned advisor for each customer, by recording the name of the advisor who supports customer for each time. Regarding services, the new online system keeps the information in terms of name and type of services such as food, drink and the payment method (cash, credit card). Regarding reservation, the system records the number of tables that are booked and information related to special events (birthday). Mala and Ashli, managers of the restaurant, hope to run an entirely testable procedure to the whole online system to find out any bug and significant issues before the final launch of the system. The Nuk restaurant considers different methods to estimate the investments in this project. Table 1 presents the information the accountant provided to the system analyst to calculate Net Present Value (NPV), Payback Period and Return on Investment (ROI). Table 1: Five-year investment evaluation Year No. Category 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 Value of benefits $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 2 Development Cost -$ 20,000.00 -$750.00 -$800.00 -$770.00 - $750.00 -$730.00 3 Annual expenses -$ 2,000.00 -$ 2,000.00 -$ 2,000.00 -$ 2,000.00 -$ 2,000.00 4 Net benefit/costs $ 20,000.00 5 Discount factor 1.00 6 Net present value -$ 20,000.00 7 Cumulative NPV -$ 20,000.00 Tasks: 1. Develop your introduction and clearly define the aims and objectives of the report. 2. The Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) identifies all the activities required to build, launch, and maintain an information system. Discuss the six core processes of the SDLC required to develop the NRS project in detail. 3. Develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) description supported with a table for the NRS project explaining the ID, description, and duration for each task. 4. Develop PERT/CPM chart explaining the early and late start for each task. Identify the critical path and the total time to finish the project. 5. Use the information in Table 1, calculate the net present value, the payback period, and the return on investment by using a discount rate of 6 percent. The development costs for the project were $20,000. Do a five-year return on investment. You may need to make some assumptions as required. Whenever you make assumptions, please state these clearly. Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Introduction (10 marks) Poor introduction with irrelevant details Introduction is presented briefly and is missing the report outline Introduction is generally presented along with the report outline Introduction is well written, and the report outline is also discussed Introduction is very well written, and the report outline is also discussed Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) (25 marks) Poorly discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the NRS project. Brief discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the NRS project. Good discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the NRS project. Well discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the NRS project. Excellent discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the NRS project. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) (15 mark) Poor description with no poor table for the NRS project to include the ID, description, and duration for each task. Brief description with brief table for the NRS project to include the ID, description, and duration for each task. Generally good description with good supported table for the NRS project to explain the ID, description, and duration for each task. Very clear description with good supported table for the NRS project to explain the ID, description, and duration for each task. Very good description with very good supported table for the NRS project to explain the ID, description, and duration for each task. PERT/CPM chart (20 mark) Lack of evidence of understanding of PERT/CPM chart with no identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Evidence of basic understanding of PERT/CPM chart with no clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Evidence of good understanding and identification of PERT/CPM chart with clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Very clear understanding and identification of PERT/CPM chart with clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Has excellent understanding and identification of PERT/CPM chart with clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Table-1 (20 mark) Table-1 is missing or most of the required fields do not correct Some fields of the table not correct or missing All fields are available but many of them not accurate. All field are available and some not very accurate All fields are available and accurate Summary (5 marks) Summary not relating to the report Brief summary of the report with some relevance Generally good summary of the report A section clearly summarizing the overall contribution A section very clearly summarizing the overall contribution References using Harvard style (5 marks) Lacks consistency with many errors. Unclear referencing/style Generally good referencing/style Clear referencing/ style Clear styles with excellent source of references. 5 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 13/02/2019, Version 1 Assessment 2: Case Study-2 Due date: Week 12 Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 2500 Weighting: 30% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 Assessment Details: The Case Study-2 assessment covers the following topics: information system development, system development approaches, data modeling, IS project management, system requirements, user and system interfaces, and system testing, deployment and maintenance. This assessment allows students to apply theoretical concepts to practice by analysing case studies and proposing a suitable