MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT301A: Ethics and Sustainability Assessment Scenario Report Individual/Group Group and Individual Length 2000 words (+/...

1 answer below »
need by tuesday...


MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT301A: Ethics and Sustainability Assessment Scenario Report Individual/Group Group and Individual Length 2000 words (+/ 10%) Peer review form Learning Outcomes a) Identify questions of ethics and sustainability and analyse how they impact on one’s day-to-day work experience. b) Apply a range of ethical frameworks and develop a vocabulary for ethical issues. c) Demonstrate the ability to apply the various frameworks that underpin how individuals and organisations make decisions on complex ethical issues. d) Analyse the impact of economic, commercial, social and environmental trends on organisation’s ethical and sustainability behaviours. e) Explore specific sustainability tools such as values-based management and stakeholder perspectives. f) Evaluate the role of the individual as an agent of ethical and sustainable behaviour in organisations. Submission Due by 10 am Friday of module 6.2 (week 12). Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks Context This assessment allows students to develop writing skills in ethics and sustainability scenarios and to explore the ways in which stakeholder theory and values management can be used by organisations, as tools in addressing economic, commercial, social and environmental problems. Instructions Group task You will be allocated to a group of three students who, in module 5.2 (week 10) and module 6.1 (week 11) will prepare a short written scenario that describes one ethical or sustainability issue facing an organisation of your choice. A framework for writing the scenario will be provided in class, and available later as an online resource in Blackboard. Individual task You will then use the group scenario to prepare an individual report. The scenario report will take the form of a business case, made to the senior management of the organisation, recommending how the issue should be dealt with. The report will employ either stakeholder theory or values management as an analytical tool.  Structure 1. Executive summary (100 words) 2. Introduction (100 words) 3. Summary of scenario (200 words) MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief Page 2 of 5 4. Description of theory used for analysis (stakeholder theory OR values management) (400 words) 5. Analysis (750 words) 6. Identification of 3 alternative solutions (250 words) 7. Recommendations (100 words) 8. Conclusion (100 words) 9. Reference list (excluded from word count) This assessment task should include appropriate academic referencing and a reference list following APA 6th edition style of referencing. Please see the Academic Skills page on Blackboard for information on referencing in APA 6th: https://laureate- au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id =_2498849_1 Peer review Each member of the group will review the contribution of other group members, to the task, using the Peer Review Form. You can find this form in the corresponding Assessment folder in Blackboard. The Peer Review Form focuses on the ways each group member behaves, in relation to ethics, throughout the activity. You will have to use one Peer Review Form, per group member, and collate these in a single document for submission. Your mark for this assessment will be based, equally, on the review provided by your peers. Scenario report The Learning Rubric (pp. 3-5) is your guide to how your assessment will be marked. Please be sure to check this rubric very carefully before submission. Submission Instructions Submit the Individual Scenario Report and Peer Review Form by 10 am Friday of module 6.2 (week 12) via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MGT301A: Ethics and Sustainability. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498849_1 https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498849_1 https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498849_1 MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief Page 3 of 5 Learning Rubric: Assessment 3- Scenario Report Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and Understanding as reflected in research and analysis. 30% Report does not address the question, demonstrates limited understanding of the topic with limited/no developed aspects of the task. Report indicates confusion of personal opinion and information (substantiated by evidence) from the research/course materials. 
 Report shows little/no evidence of research or enquiry. Report addresses the basic components of the question, demonstrates only a cursory understanding of the topic and develops the minimum aspects of the task. Report indicates some confusion of personal opinion and information (substantiated by evidence) from the research/course materials. 
 Report shows basic evidence of research or enquiry. Report addresses most components of the question, demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and develops most aspects of the task. Report t justifies personal opinion, by utilising evidence and information from independent research. Report shows sufficient evidence of research or enquiry. Report addresses the full components of the question, demonstrates a very good understanding of the topic and develops all aspects of the task. Report discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information (substantiated by robust evidence) from independent research and extended reading. Report shows substantial evidence of research or enquiry. Report addresses the full components of the question, demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic and develops thorough and critical analysis of the task. Report systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from independent research. Report shows exceptional evidence of research or enquiry and indicates serious contemplation of sources and extended reading. Identification of solutions and recommendations Requires a clearer identification of alternative solutions and recommendations. Alternative solutions and recommendations have been identified. Alternative solutions and recommendations have been proficiently identified. Alternative solutions and recommendations have been effectively identified. Alternative solutions and recommendations have been skilfully identified. MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief Page 4 of 5 30% Requires justification, based on analysis of theoretical frameworks and academic resources, as applied to the organisation’s context and ethical/sustainability issue. A basic standard of justification is inconsistently based on a satisfactory level of analysis and superficially supported by evidence to address the organisation’s ethical/sustainability issue. A good standard of justification, based on a good level of analysis, and partially supported by evidence to address the organisation’s ethical/sustainability issue. A discerning and critical standard of justification based on in-depth analysis, and well supported by evidence to address the organisation’s ethical/sustainability issue. An expert standard of justification based on critical, in-depth analysis, and supported by evidence thoroughly, to address the organisation’s ethical/sustainability issue. Structure and Flow of Ideas 20% Report does not present information and evidence adequately. Report lacks logical/clear structure and flow of ideas, making it difficult to understand. Line of reasoning is unclear and difficult to follow. Report presents information and evidence sufficiently, however requires further logic and more clarity. Report has a sufficient structure, however flow of ideas are a challenge and can be difficult to understand. Line of reasoning is passable, however, can sometimes be difficult to follow and requires clarity. Report presents information and evidence clearly and logically. Report has a good structure, with a good flow of ideas. Line of reasoning is of a good standard and easy to follow. Report presents information and evidence clearly and logically. Report has a sufficient structure, however flow of ideas are a challenge and can be difficult to understand. Line of reasoning is of an exceptional standard and easy to follow. Report presents information and evidence clearly and logically. Report has a good structure, with a good flow of ideas. Line of reasoning is of a professional standard and easy to follow. Correct citation of key resources and evidence Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, however, these are not always Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief Page 5 of 5 10% to support and develop ideas. Does not use sufficient sources. Does not include correct references or in- text citations; does not use APA 6th style.
Answered Same DayAug 19, 2020MGT301A

Answer To: MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT301A: Ethics and...

Sarabjeet answered on Aug 20 2020
146 Votes
Running head: Ethics and Sustainability
Ethics and Sustainability
Ethics and Sustainability
Student Name
University Name
Contents
1.    Executive summary    3
2.    Introduction    3
3. Summary of scenario    4
3.    Description of theory used for analysis (stakeholder theory)    4
5. Analysis    6
6. Identification of 3 alternative solutions    8
7. Recommendations    9
8. Conclusion    9
1. Executive summary
Morality is a set of ethical values and standards that guide the behaviour. The moral values and standards in all soc
ieties are different. Morality grows in a social context. Business ethics means “taking the right path”. Ethical behaviour takes into account all the factors of the business. This report highlights ethics and sustainability issues and analyzes the impact of Cafe 63's daily work experience. The report also discusses the scope of the ethical framework facing café 63 and the vocabulary for developing ethical issues. The report also includes the ability to apply various frameworks that support individuals and organizations in making decisions about complex ethical issues and the impact of economic, business, social, and environmental trends on the organization's ethical and sustainable behaviour.
2. Introduction
Almost all restaurants and hotels avoid providing a bottle of free water to every customer arriving at the venue, avoiding wasting coffee cups. Cafe 63 serves breakfast, dinner, lunch, and flowers. They have 34 different venues around Brisbane, each of which is licensed. It is a very famous café in Brisbane because of the good service they offer and how to promote the café. It is clear that consumer power is one of the cornerstones of corporate social responsibility. When consumers demand socially and ecologically sustainable goods, companies can obtain these goods economically, so there will be a win-win situation for corporate profits and social/environmental areas. The needs of consumers and the possibility of corporate profits are prerequisites for corporate social responsibility. It is clear that voluntary approaches to sustainable development, such as consumer choice and corporate social responsibility, can lead to many positive changes; however, there are concerns about achieving sustainable development.
3. Summary of scenario
Cafe 63 tries to advertise their car care environment with fake car grass and sell flowers at each venue, which makes the cafe look like a “green supporter”. In fact, they donate a bottle of free water (non-recyclable plastic) to each customer entering the venue. This bottle of water is free. If there is a table for 10 people, instead of 3 bottles of water for each customer, they will only give each customer 10 non-recyclable plastic bottles (Brauer, 2012). they. Most customers go to the cafe 63 after coffee or food, so it may be that the bottle of water will eventually be placed somewhere in the trash can, filled with all the water. This is a good way for the company to promote its brand, as each bottle has the logo of the Cafe 63 and a reservation for the person reading the bottle, with all the contact information. Another sustainability-related issue facing Cafe 63 is the extensive use of coffee cups. People have seen that when they sell very hot products, such as long black coffee, they even use double coffee cups, which is a huge waste of cardboard. The ethical issue facing Cafe 63 is that they sell environmentally friendly products because of the sale of their cars, cardboard made of flowers and straws, to avoid people paying attention to the waste of plastic every time they give up more than 1,000 bottles of water when customers want to take Add coffee cups every day while walking their coffee (Hummel, Schlick & Fifka, 2017).
3. Description of theory used for analysis (stakeholder theory)
Stakeholder theory described by Edward Freeman and others is an image reflecting corporate social responsibility. Shareholder theory begins in the world, not looking at the business, looking at the world, and looking at the moral responsibility there. A list of individuals and groups who are affected by the behavior of the Cafe 63 is necessary and it is necessary that the plant owner needs to be responsible for the disposal of the waste from the CSR perspective safely. In contrast, shareholder theorists initiate the people living in the neighborhood, who may be poisoned by their environment, and they have to speak about business ethics by insisting that they have the right to clean air and water (Kaspereit & Lopatta, 2014). That's why they are shareholders of Cafe 63 and their sound contribution to company decisions is also necessary. Indeed, they may not have stocks, but they have a moral necessity to participate in the decision-making process. This is a very important issue. In the least theory, people affected by Cafe's actions actually become shareholders and owners because they have been moved because of the Cafe 63, they have the right to participate in the management. However, in reality, a strict stakeholder theory, a person's insistence on giving moral claims to anyone affected by the company's...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here