Meyerson assumes that giving CEOs and their boards a choice as to whether they want to “persist in excessive executive compensation” or “reduce executive pay” (par. 11) strengthens his solution. Why...

Meyerson assumes that giving CEOs and their boards a choice as to whether they want to “persist in excessive executive compensation” or “reduce executive pay” (par. 11) strengthens his solution. Why does Meyerson assume that choice is so important to one of the solutions he offers? Do you agree with him? Explain your answer. What assumptions does Meyerson make about choice and its power to persuade people to do something they may not otherwise do?