I hv attached the file
Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd CRICOS Provider No: 01545C, 03245K NSW Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Case Study Analysis (Individual) School School of Business Course Name Master of Professional Accounting (MPA) Unit Code MA625 Unit Title Entrepreneurship and Innovation Trimester Trimester 2, 2020 Assessment Author Dr Eijaz Khan Assessment Type Individual Assessment Title Case Study Analysis Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed: c. Critically evaluate entrepreneurship planning including, but not limited to: sources of financing, networks for entrepreneurs, legal/IP issues, and the marketing of an innovative idea. e. Critically analyse and interpret case studies, research and integrate appropriate theoretical entrepreneurship and innovation concepts in the production of a project report. Weight 25% Total Marks 25 Word limit 1500 Release Date Week 3 Due Date Week 6 (24 August 2020) Submission Guidelines: All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date (as above) along with a completed Assessment Cover Sheet. The assessment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.5cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the Assessment Task, and listed appropriately at the end in a Reference List using APA 6th edition for the School of Business. https://library.mit.edu.au/referencing/APA Extension / Special Consideration If an extension of time to submit work is required, an Application for Special Consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted online via your Academic Management System (AMS) login: https://online.mit.edu.au/ams. The Application for Special consideration must be submitted no later than three (3) working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination for which you are seeking Special Consideration. In the case of serious illness, loss or bereavement, hardship or trauma students may be granted special consideration. Academic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. Assessment Cover Sheet Student ID Number/s: Student Last name/s: Student First name/s: Course: School: Unit code: Unit title: Due date: Date submitted: Campus: Lecturer’s Name: Tutor: Student Declaration I/We declare and certify that: 1. the work contained in this assessment is my/our own work/group work, except where acknowledgement of sources is made; 1. this assessment has not been submitted previously for academic credit in this or any other course; 1. I/we have read MIT’s Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct Policy and Procedure, and I/we understand the consequences of engaging in plagiarism, collusion and contract cheating; 1. a copy of the original assignment is retained by me/us and that I/we may be required to submit the original assignment to the Lecturer and/or Unit Co-ordinator upon request; I/we have not plagiarised the work of others or participated in unauthorised collaboration or contract cheating when preparing this assessment. MIT ID Signature Date For Assessor Use Only (if not marked on Moodle) Name: Position Date: Signature: Marks/Grades: Assessment Task Description In this assignment, students are required to write a report on a selected entrepreneur. If you have any doubt about the suitability of your selection, please consult with your lecturer for advice and approval. They need to evaluate the selected entrepreneur to come up with answers for the following questions: a. What are the main attributes of the entrepreneur which help him/her to success? b. How is the personality and personal approach of the selected entrepreneur? c. What are the businesses, products and/or services, and markets of the selected entrepreneur? d. How is the process involved in entrepreneurship from opportunity identification until commercialisation? e. Discuss the nature of any challenges the selected entrepreneur faces during this process. f. What overall lessons might be drawn from the experience of this person and their business, for the benefit of future entrepreneurs? Use APA referencing style to present the references. The cases study analysis report should consist of a minimum 5-8 academic resources including peer reviewed journal articles. The assessment should have a reference list at the end of the report. The approximate word limit for this assignment is 1500 words excluding references. Format: The report should use Calibri Body (Font size 11) as the normal text and have margins of 2.5cm all around. Please use reasonable font sizes for headings. Submission: Soft copy of the assessment must be submitted via the Assessment Dropbox on MIT Moodle. Report structure: •Title page: name of the case study •Abstract: key findings in one paragraph (200 words) •Table of Contents: with section numbers and headings (word count is not required) •Introduction: brief introduction, summarise the case and point out the important facts (300 words) •Identifying and analysing by addressing questions ‘a-e’ (700 words) •Recommendations by addressing question ‘f’ (200 words) •Conclusion (100 words) •Full in-text referencing: citing at least five to eight academic sources •Reference list: APA referencing style required. (word count is not required). Marking criteria: Assessment criteria are shown in the following table. Marks are allocated as follows: Assessment criteria to be met and assessed Detailed Description of the Assessment Criteria Breakdown Marks Criteria 1 Demonstrated knowledge and understanding of key concept/s 20 Criteria 2 Evident research into subject matter (including quality of reference sources) 20 Criteria 3 Demonstrated insight/s into the challenges of translating entrepreneurship theory and models into practice 40 Criteria 4 Written communication skills: Writing Style; Paraphrasing; Spelling/Grammar; Proof reading 10 Criteria 5 Referencing: Appropriate use of in-text referencing; quality and number of references; correct ‘end-text’ referencing 10 Total 100 Using Technology for Assessment Rationale Activities Technological tools selected · reflection on learning · feedback on performance · practice of critical thinking · check for plagiarism · problem-based learning · collaborative writing · Moodle · Turnitin MA625 Entrepreneurship and Innovation Page 4 of © MIT March 2020 T1-2020 v1 Marking Rubric for Individual Assignment: Marking Rubric Criteria / Grades High Distinction (HD) [Excellent] = or >80% Distinction (D) [Very Good] 70%-79% Credit (C) [Good] 60%-69% Pass (P) [Satisfactory] 50%-59% Fail (N) [Unsatisfactory] <50% criteria 1 excellent demonstrated knowledge of key concepts good demonstrated knowledge of key concepts generally satisfactory demonstration of knowledge of key concepts. some demonstration of knowledge of key concepts. little or no demonstrated knowledge of key concepts criteria 2 excellent demonstrated research into subject matter strong demonstrated research in to subject matter adequate demonstrated research into subject matter, but some sources could be stronger demonstration of limited research into subject matter, but could be substantially stronger overall little or no demonstration of relevant research, using appropriate sources criteria 3 outstanding demonstrated insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice strong demonstrated insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice some demonstrated insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice limited insight shown into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice did not demonstrate insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice criteria 4 excellent academic writing with very few errors in structure and logical expression professionally expressed very good academic writing with few errors in structure and expression very well expressed with few errors good academic writing with some errors in structure and expression. expressed well with some grammar errors acceptable academic writing with some errors in structure and logical expression. acceptably expressed with some spelling or grammar errors inadequate academic writing with errors in structure and logical expression. expression lacks clarity with lot of spelling or grammar errors criteria 5 sufficient apa reference list provided with no errors sufficient apa reference list provided with few errors sufficient apa reference list provided with some errors sufficient apa reference list provided with major errors insufficient apa reference list provided mark: overall feedback criteria="" 1="" excellent="" demonstrated="" knowledge="" of="" key="" concepts="" good="" demonstrated="" knowledge="" of="" key="" concepts="" generally="" satisfactory="" demonstration="" of="" knowledge="" of="" key="" concepts.="" some="" demonstration="" of="" knowledge="" of="" key="" concepts.="" little="" or="" no="" demonstrated="" knowledge="" of="" key="" concepts="" criteria="" 2="" excellent="" demonstrated="" research="" into="" subject="" matter="" strong="" demonstrated="" research="" in="" to="" subject="" matter="" adequate="" demonstrated="" research="" into="" subject="" matter,="" but="" some="" sources="" could="" be="" stronger="" demonstration="" of="" limited="" research="" into="" subject="" matter,="" but="" could="" be="" substantially="" stronger="" overall="" little="" or="" no="" demonstration="" of="" relevant="" research,="" using="" appropriate="" sources="" criteria="" 3="" outstanding="" demonstrated="" insight="" into="" the="" translation="" of="" entrepreneurship="" theory="" into="" practice="" strong="" demonstrated="" insight="" into="" the="" translation="" of="" entrepreneurship="" theory="" into="" practice="" some="" demonstrated="" insight="" into="" the="" translation="" of="" entrepreneurship="" theory="" into="" practice="" limited="" insight="" shown="" into="" the="" translation="" of="" entrepreneurship="" theory="" into="" practice="" did="" not="" demonstrate="" insight="" into="" the="" translation="" of="" entrepreneurship="" theory="" into="" practice="" criteria="" 4="" excellent="" academic="" writing="" with="" very="" few="" errors="" in="" structure="" and="" logical="" expression="" professionally="" expressed="" very="" good="" academic="" writing="" with="" few="" errors="" in="" structure="" and="" expression="" very="" well="" expressed="" with="" few="" errors="" good="" academic="" writing="" with="" some="" errors="" in="" structure="" and="" expression.="" expressed="" well="" with="" some="" grammar="" errors="" acceptable="" academic="" writing="" with="" some="" errors="" in="" structure="" and="" logical="" expression.="" acceptably="" expressed="" with="" some="" spelling="" or="" grammar="" errors="" inadequate="" academic="" writing="" with="" errors="" in="" structure="" and="" logical="" expression.="" expression="" lacks="" clarity="" with="" lot="" of="" spelling="" or="" grammar="" errors="" criteria="" 5="" sufficient="" apa="" reference="" list="" provided="" with="" no="" errors="" sufficient="" apa="" reference="" list="" provided="" with="" few="" errors="" sufficient="" apa="" reference="" list="" provided="" with="" some="" errors="" sufficient="" apa="" reference="" list="" provided="" with="" major="" errors="" insufficient="" apa="" reference="" list="" provided="" mark:="" overall="">50% criteria 1 excellent demonstrated knowledge of key concepts good demonstrated knowledge of key concepts generally satisfactory demonstration of knowledge of key concepts. some demonstration of knowledge of key concepts. little or no demonstrated knowledge of key concepts criteria 2 excellent demonstrated research into subject matter strong demonstrated research in to subject matter adequate demonstrated research into subject matter, but some sources could be stronger demonstration of limited research into subject matter, but could be substantially stronger overall little or no demonstration of relevant research, using appropriate sources criteria 3 outstanding demonstrated insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice strong demonstrated insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice some demonstrated insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice limited insight shown into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice did not demonstrate insight into the translation of entrepreneurship theory into practice criteria 4 excellent academic writing with very few errors in structure and logical expression professionally expressed very good academic writing with few errors in structure and expression very well expressed with few errors good academic writing with some errors in structure and expression. expressed well with some grammar errors acceptable academic writing with some errors in structure and logical expression. acceptably expressed with some spelling or grammar errors inadequate academic writing with errors in structure and logical expression. expression lacks clarity with lot of spelling or grammar errors criteria 5 sufficient apa reference list provided with no errors sufficient apa reference list provided with few errors sufficient apa reference list provided with some errors sufficient apa reference list provided with major errors insufficient apa reference list provided mark: overall feedback>