Many adults nowadays grew up with social media through their adolescence years. It is not uncommon to hear of someone in the public eye getting in trouble for things they posted (i.e. posting dangerous/illegal behavior, inappropriate content, content that is not politically correct (etc.) on social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.) when they were younger. Given the current “cancel culture”, do you think someone should get in trouble for something the said/did when they were adolescents? Should they be held responsible for their actions and punished (be “cancelled”)? Why or why not?
You do not have to base your paper on specific acts or a specific post. You are free to come up with an example of your choice or speak more generally and give a few examples.
Discuss the relevant physical, cognitive, and/or social aspects of development during adolescence and argue why or why not an adult should get in trouble, or “cancelled” for something they did when they were adolescents. (To provide some context, imagine the person is now 25 years old and the troubling behavior was made when they were 16).
APA 7 Format
You should cite and summarize at least three peer-reviewed journal articles in your paper (above and beyond textbook and lecture material). It might be helpful to go into some details and describe a bit of the methodology used by the authors (of the peer-reviewed source) to explain how they came to those conclusions which support your advice. This is a big part of the marking rubric as it serves an example and helps support your advice to describe empirical research!
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here