Make a PPT and a speech script (should be less than 500 words) for the presentation based on my assignment.Please check all of the files I attached to see the task description and criteria sheet.For some questions like "What parts of the solutions you developed did you modify AFTER you had received feedback?", you can make it up properly, but have to make sense.
Thank you very much.
Assessment 3 – Presentation Due 5pm Friday Week 13 Goal The goal of this assessment item is for you to demonstrate that you have used and understood the design principles taught in the first part of this course, and the Python implementation techniques taught in the second half. Description You are to deliver a PowerPoint presentation (no less than 4m30s and no more than 5m30s) outlining the design and implementation phases of your assignment. The first part of your presentation should identify at least one (1) area of your design where you used each of the following algorithm components: · A function · A decision/conditional structure · A loop/repetition structure You also need to justify the use of these elements, as well as how you identified the relevant variables (inputs/outputs, decisions, loop conditions etc.). The second part of your presentation should look at the implementation phase, specifically: · What parts of implementing a solution (that you were given) did you find tricky · What parts of the solutions you developed did you modify AFTER you had received feedback? · What parts of the solutions you developed did you modify AFTER you began the implementation phase (not based on feedback) · What parts of ANY implementation did you find tricky, and how did you solve and errors you encountered (you don’t have to give ALL errors, but if there were some big ones mention them here). Remember to stick to your time limit. Marking On the next page you will find the marking rubric for this assignment. Assessment Task Three - Presentation Criteria Unacceptable 0 - 20% Limited 20 - 40% Basic 40 - 60% Sound 60% - 80% Excellent 80% - 100% Weighting Demonstrates a basic understanding of essential terminology, classifications, principles, theories, models, structures, algorithms, techniques, methods and/or criteria for a career in technology related professions and practice. No use of problems solving or programming terminology, models, techniques or methods Mostly incorrect use of problems solving or programming terminology, models, techniques or methods Mostly correct use of problems solving or programming terminology, models, techniques or methods. More than 5 mistakes. Good correct use of problems solving or programming terminology, models, techniques or methods. More than 3 but no more than mistakes. Excellent use of problems solving or programming terminology, models, techniques or methods. No more than 3 mistakes. 15 Critically analyses and evaluates concepts and procedures in routine applications, investigations, problem solving and/or projects. No analysis of problem solving or implementation process Limited analysis of problem solving or implementation process. No explanation of the approach taken by the student Some analysis of problem solving or implementation process. Some explanation of the approach taken by the student, but more than 5 inconsistencies or errors Good analysis of problem solving or implementation process. Some explanation of the approach taken by the student. More than 3 but no more than 5 inconsistencies or errors Excellent analysis of problem solving or implementation process. Some explanation of the approach taken by the student. No more than 3 inconsistencies or errors 15 Critically applies theoretical principles and concepts from at least one perspective/ domain in practice. No discussion of problem solving or programming techniques Limited discussion of problem solving or programming techniques Some discussion of problem solving or programming techniques. The discussion mostly lines up with the plan and implementation part of the assignment, but there are more than 5 errors or inconsistencies Good discussion of problem solving or programming techniques. The discussion mostly lines up with the plan and implementation part of the assignment, but there are more than 3 but no more than 5 errors or inconsistencies Excellent discussion of problem solving or programming techniques. The discussion mostly lines up with the plan and implementation part of the assignment. There are no more than 3 errors or inconsistencies 15 Delivers the presentation with some credibility. Largely attends to voice projection and pronunciation. Demonstrates some enthusiasm and generally appropriate eye contact, gestures, movement and attire. No credibility in the presentation. No evidence of preparation or practice Limited evidence of preparation and practice. Little or no enthusiasm, intonation, gestures etc Some evidence of preparation and practice. Appropriate use of intonation and gestures. Some enthusiasm Good evidence of preparation and practice. Good use of intonation and gestures. Good levels of enthusiasm Evidence of high levels of preparation and practice. Excellent use of intonation and gestures. High levels of enthusiasm 20 Largely communicates key message/s through introduction, sequencing of material within body, and conclusion, and some use of explanation, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies and/or quotations. No clear structure or focus of the presentation. Key point were unclear or non-existent. No explanations or examples given Some structure to the presentation, but most key points were unclear. Very poor use of examples or explanations Some structure to the presentation, and most key points were clear. Decent use of examples or explanations Presentation had a good, clear structure, and most points were clear. However, there were more than 3 issues or areas of confusion. Good use of examples and explanations Presentation had an excellent structure, and almost all points were clear. There were no more than 3 issues or areas of confusion. Excellent use of examples and explanations 20 Presents within time limit though some points may be too rushed. More than 2 minutes over or under the 5 minute time limit More than 1 minute 30 seconds, but no more than 2 minutes, over or under the 5 minute time limit More than 1 minute, but no more than 1 minute 30 seconds, over or under the 5 minute time limit More than 30 seconds, but no more than 1 minute, over or under the 5 minute time limit No more than 30 seconds, over or under the 5 minute time limit 15