Let S = {1 – x, 2 – 2x} C F(R, R). Consider the following possible proof (blue text) that S is linearly dependent: Suppose that (*) a(1 — г) + b(2 — 2.г) — 0. Since a = -2 and h = 1 is a solution to...


Hi, I need help with this problem, please. Thank you!


Let S = {1 – x, 2 – 2x} C F(R, R). Consider the following possible proof (blue text) that S is linearly<br>dependent:<br>Suppose that<br>(*)<br>a(1 — г) + b(2 — 2.г) — 0.<br>Since a<br>= -2 and h<br>= 1 is a solution to (*), it follows that S is linearly dependent.<br>Choose the response that best describes the argument above.<br>O S is linearly dependent, but the proof is incorrect because we can't simply assume that a(1 – x) + b(2 – 2x)<br>this statement must be proven.<br>0:<br>O This proof can't be correct because S is linearly independent.<br>O This proof would have correctly shown that S is linearly independent if the writer had written

Extracted text: Let S = {1 – x, 2 – 2x} C F(R, R). Consider the following possible proof (blue text) that S is linearly dependent: Suppose that (*) a(1 — г) + b(2 — 2.г) — 0. Since a = -2 and h = 1 is a solution to (*), it follows that S is linearly dependent. Choose the response that best describes the argument above. O S is linearly dependent, but the proof is incorrect because we can't simply assume that a(1 – x) + b(2 – 2x) this statement must be proven. 0: O This proof can't be correct because S is linearly independent. O This proof would have correctly shown that S is linearly independent if the writer had written "linearly independent" instead of "linearly dependent" at the end of the last sentence. S is linearly dependent, but the proof is incorrect because it only gives one specific example of a solution to (*) instead of giving a general solution. O This is a correct proof that S is linearly dependent.

Jun 04, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here