Let p and q be the following statements. p: The conference is in London. q: Maya is a presenter. Consider this argument. Premise 1: The conference is in London or Maya is a presenter. Premise 2: The...

Let p and q be the following statements. p: The conference is in London. q: Maya is a presenter. Consider this argument. Premise 1: The conference is in London or Maya is a presenter. Premise 2: The conference is in London. Conclusion: Therefore, Maya is not a presenter. (a) Write the argument in symbolic form. Premise 1: ___ Premise 2: ___ Conclusion: ___ (b) We can express the given argument as a conditional statement in this form. ((Premise 1) ^ (Premise 2)) - Conclusion Based on the symbolic form you entered in part (a), a conditional statement of the above form is shown in the truth table. Complete the truth table. Use T for true and F for false. (c) Is the argument valid? Yes or No?

Extracted text: Let p and q be the following statements. p: The conference is in London. q: Maya is a presenter. Consider this argument. Premise 1: The conference is in London or Maya is a presenter. Premise 2: The conference is in London. Conclusion: Therefore, Maya is not a presenter. (a) Write the argument in symbolic form. Premise 1: Premise 2: OvO Conclusion: .. (b) We can express the given argument as a conditional statement in this form. ((Premise 1)^ (Premise 2)) . - Conclusion Based on the symbolic form you entered in part (a), a conditional statement of the above form is shown in the truth table. Complete the truth table. Use T for true and F for false. You may add more columns, but those added columns will not be graded. 9 (O-D - I A conditional statement based on your answer from part (a) will fill in here. p T OvO T F O-0 F F F (c) Is the argument valid? O Yes O No