LAW100- Business Law Assessment 1: Group Essay Due: XXXXXXXXXXWeek 6 Length: XXXXXXXXXXwords Conditions: XXXXXXXXXXGroup of 5 Weighting: XXXXXXXXXX% Requirements: You are expected to use the academic...

AAA


LAW100- Business Law Assessment 1: Group Essay Due: Week 6 Length: 1200 words Conditions: Group of 5 Weighting: 10% Requirements: You are expected to use the academic literature to support a well-constructed argument on the above topic. That is, you are supposed to write an annotated bibliography rather than just descriptions and summary (please see the link below as to what is an annotated bibliography). ‘Acceptance is a definite and unqualified assent to an offer, on all of its terms. Any acceptance given conditionally will not result in a legally binding agreement.’ Discuss the accuracy of the above statement with reference to Australian contract law. Your answer should include reference to a number of relevant cases, focusing on explaining the decisions of the court in each, rather than merely summarising the facts. You should discuss the role acceptance plays in contract formation, including explanation and discussion of the way the courts have responded to conditional or qualified ‘acceptance’, citing the relevant judicial decisions. You must use a number of reputable academic sources outside of the prescribed text and follow the footnotes and bibliography. Marks are specifically awarded for the above. Failure to conduct adequate research or to properly acknowledge sources may result in failing the assignment or further penalties. This assignment must be submitted through the Turnitin link for this assignment. Note: A link on the sample description of annotated bibliography from UNSW: https://student.unsw.edu.au/annotated-bibliography LAW100 Business Law (20S1 – Major Assessment Essay- Marking rubric) Group# Students’ names in the group: ………………………………………………... Students’ IDs in the group: ……………………………………………...………………………………………………...………... Part A: Below Expectations - fail grade Meets Expectations – pass to credit grade Exceeds Expectations - distinction to high distinction grade 1. Essay Bibliography (Harvard form) Limited references. Research narrow or irrelevant. 8 references from wide range of sources. More than 8 references from a wide range of sources. Assessment task informed by research. Work shows little or no evidence of use of research material. Research material incorporated into work.. Research material effectively incorporated into work. 2. Applying the knowledge Understanding Limited understanding Sound understanding Sophisticated understanding Applying the knowledge Limited acknowledgement Acknowledgement Sophisticated ability to applying the knowledge 3. ESSAY CONVENTION Presentation (Prescribed form - double spaced, 12pt font, 3cm margins) Problems with style, structure, English expression, development of argument. Not presented in accordance with prescribed form. Essay well written. Appropriate style, structure, English expression, development of argument. Presented in accordance with prescribed form. Essay well written, with attention to style, structure, English expression and development of argument. Essay engaging with clear opinions. Presented in accordance with prescribed form. 4. References In-essay citations in Harvard form. Poorly identified. Good coverage Excellent work Part A Mark /40 Marker’s Name: Ross (Nirosha) Gunasekera Comments: