Knowledge transfer activity Graded Mode of submission: Online Weighting: 25% Length: 3,000-5,000 words equivalent Due date: Tuesday Week 13 by 3.00 pm Students will be required to refine their work...

Knowledge transfer activity Graded Mode of submission: Online Weighting: 25% Length: 3,000-5,000 words equivalent Due date: Tuesday Week 13 by 3.00 pm Students will be required to refine their work from assignment 2, addressing peer review feedback from assignment 3, to the level where the work is ready for submission for formal external peer review. Students will be required to either (a) prepare their work for peer review, suitable for an appropriate forum (either to a refereed journal, workplace or CaseWorld) or (b) complete a professional presentation (as an education session, a proposal for clinical change or a presentation to a clinical group). Students work will be assessed against a range of criteria including relevance to professional practice, research evidence basis, originality and writing quality. All students must submit via FLO the following three items of work: 1) A final draft with all changes clearly marked using tracked changes or highlighted. 2) a) A final version with changes accepted as prepared for submission (either to CaseWorld or a refereed journal) OR b) a professional presentation 3) A response to the reviewers table which addresses student peer review feedback, lecturer marking feedback and where applicable mentor feedback. The response to the reviewers table should have 3 columns: the review feedback, the student’s response and a final column that indicates where tracked or highlighted changes have been made in the assignment (ie item 1 above). (please note some student examples only have 2 of these columns) Please combine these 3 items into a single document.