Johnson Enterprises, Inc., contracted with the accounting firm of P, A & E to perform an audit of Johnson. The accounting firm performed its duty in a non-negligent, competent manner but failed to discover a novel embezzlement scheme perpetrated by Johnson’s treasurer. Shortly thereafter, Johnson’s treasurer disappeared with $175,000 of the company’s money. Johnson now refuses to pay P, A & E its $50,000 audit fee and is seeking to recover $175,000 from P, A & E.
a. What are the rights and liabilities of P, A & E and Johnson? Explain.
b. Would your answer to (a) differ if the scheme was a common embezzlement scheme that generally accepted accounting standards should have disclosed? Explain
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here