John E. Gamble University of South Alabama A lternative beverages such as energy drinks, sports drinks, and vitamin-enhanced beverages were the stars of the beverage industry during the mid-2000s. Rapid growth in the category, coupled with premium prices and high profit margins made alternative beverages an important part of beverage companies' lineup of brands. Global beverage companies such as CocaCola and PepsiCo had relied on such beverages to sustain volume growth in mature markets where consumers were reducing their consumption of carbonated soft drinks. In addition, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and other beverage companies were intent on expanding the market for alternative beverages by introducing energy drinks, sports drinks, and vitamin drinks in more and more emerging international markets. Global beverage producers had not been the only ones to benefit from increasing consumer demand for alternative beverage choices. Entrepreneurs such as the founders of Red Bull GmbH, Rockstar, Inc., Hansen Natural Corporation (maker of Monster Energy), Living Essentials (maker of 5-Hour Energy), and Energy Brands (originator of glaceau vitaminwater) had become multimillionaires through their development and sale of alternative beverages. However, the premium-priced alternative beverage market had been hit especially hard by the lingering economic downturn in the United States. Sales of sports drinks declined by 12.3 percent between 2008 and 2009, and sales of flavored and vitamin-enhanced waters had declined by 12.5 percent over the same period. The sales of energy minks fared better, but 2009 segment sales exceeded sales in 2008 by only 0.2 percent. Industry analysts were undecided on what percentage of the poor 2009 performance for alternative beverages was related to the overall economy and how much could be attributed to market maturity. Beverage producers had made various attempts at increasing the size of the market for alternative beverages by extending existing product lines and developing altogether new products. For example, PepsiCo had expanded its lineup of Amp Energy drinks to 12 flavors, expanded SoBe vitamin-enhanced beverages to 28 flavors and variations, and increased the Gatorade lineup to include dozens of flavors and variations. Beverage producers were also seeking additional growth by quickly launching concentrated two-ounce energy shots to garner a share of the new beverage category that originated with the development of Living Essentials' 5-Hour Energy. Some beverage producers were also moving to capture demand for new relaxation drinks that were designed to have a calming effect or help those with insomnia. While attempting to expand the market for alternative beverages and increase sales and market share, beverage producers also were forced to contend with criticism from some that energy drinks, energy shots, and relaxation drinks presented health risks for consumers and that some producers' strategies promoted reckless behavior. Excessive consumption of high-caffeine-content beverages could produce arrhythmias and insomnia, while mixing alcohol with energy drinks could mask the consumer's level of intoxication and lead to increased risk-taking and other serious alcohol-related problems. In addition, many physicians warned consumers against consuming Copyright © 2010 by John E. Gamble. All rights reserved. o » en m CJ1 C-76 Part 2 Cases in Crafting and Executing Strateqy relaxation drinks that contained the potentially harmful ingredients melatonin and kava. But as 20 II approached, the primary concern of most producers of energy drinks, sports drinks, and vitamin-enhanced beverages was how to best improve their competitive standing in the marketplace. INDUSTRY CONDITIONS IN 2010 The global beverage industry was projected to grow from $1. 58 trillion in 2009 to nearly $1. 78 trillion in 2014 as beverage producers entered new geographic markets, developed new types of beverages, and continued to create demand for popular drinks. A great deal of industry growth was expected to result from steady growth in the purchasing power of consumers in developing countries, since the saturation rate for all types of beverages was high in developed countries. For example, market maturity and poor economic conditions caused the U.S. beverage industry to decline by 2.1 percent in 2008 and by 3.1 percent in 2009. The 2.3 percent decline in the volume sales of carbonated soft drinks marked the Exh ibit 1 Dollar Value and Volume Sales of the Global Beverage Industry, 2005-2009, with Forecasts for 2010-2014 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010· 2011· 2012- 2013" 2014- $1,428.4 1,469.3 1,514.1 1,548.3 1,581.7 1,618.4 1,657.6 1,696.1 1,736.5 1,775.3 391.8 409.1 427.3 442.6 458.3 474.9 492.1 508.4 525.8 542.5 "Forecast. Source: Global Beverages Industry Profile, Dalamonilor, March 2010. fifth consecutive year that U.S. consumers had purchased fewer carbonated soft drinks than the year before. Industry analysts believed that while carbonated soft drinks would remain the most-consumed beverage in the United States for some time, annual sales would continue to decline as consumers developed preferences for bottled water, sports drinks, fruit juices, readyto-drink tea, vitamin-enhanced beverages, energy drinks, ready-to-drink coffee, and other types of beverages. As consumer preferences shifted during the 2000s, sports drinks, energy drinks, and vitaminenhanced drinks had grown to become important segments within the industry in 2010. In addition, such alternative beverages tended to carry high price points, which made them attractive to both new entrants and established beverage companies such as the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo. Sports drinks and vitamin-enhanced beverages tended to carry retail prices that were 50 to 75 percent higher than similar-size carbonated soft drinks and bottled water, while energy drink pricing by volume might be as much as 400 percent higher than carbonated soft drinks. While the alternative beverage segment of the industry offered opportunities for bottlers, the poor economy had decreased demand for higher-priced beverages, with sales of sports drinks declining by 12.3 percent between 2008 and 2009 and the sales of flavored and vitamin-enhanced waters declining by 12.5 percent over the same period. The economy had also impacted the sales of energy drinks, but only by slowing the growth in volume sales to 0.2 percent between 2008 and 2009. Among all types of beverages, only energy drinks and ready-to-drink tea experienced volume growth between 2008 and 2009. Exhibits 1 and 2 present sales statistics for the global and U.S. beverage industry. Worldwide dollar sales of alternative beverages (sports drinks, energy drinks, and vitamin-enhanced beverages) grew by more than 13 percent annually between 2005 and 2007 before slowing to about 6 percent annually between 2007 and 2009. Demand in the United States had contributed greatly to the worldwide growth in alternative beverage consumption, with the United States accounting for 42.3 percent of the industry's worldwide sales of $40.2 billion in 2009. In the United States, sports drinks accounted for Case 5 CompeLition in Energy Drinks, Sports Drinks, and Vitamin-Enhanced Beverages C-77 Exhibit 2 U.S. Beverage Industry Volume Sales by Segment, 2009 Carbonated soft drinks 13,919.3 48.2% -2.3% +0.4 Bottled water 8,435.3 29.2 -2.7 +0.1 Fruit beverages 3,579.2 12.4 -3.7 -0.1 Sports drinks 1,157.8 4.0 -12.3 +0.4 Ready-to-drink tea 901.4 3.1 1.2 +0.1 Flavored or enhanced water 460.0 1.6 -12.5 -0.2 Energy drinks 354.5 1.2 0.2 0.0 Ready-to-drink coffee 51.5 0.2 -5.4 0.0 --- --- -- Total 28,859.0 100.0% - 3.1% 0.0 Note: Totals may not match data reported by Datamonitor because of differences in research methods. Source: Beverage Marketing Corporation, as reported in 'jO, Market in Decline,"Beverage World, April 2010, p.52. 2005 $27.7 9.4 Exhibit 4 Geographic Share of the 2006 31.9 10.3 Alternative Beverages 2007 35.5 11.1 Market, 2009 2008 37.8 11.9 2009 40.2 12.7 - 2010' 42.8 13.5 United States 42.3% 2011' 45.5 14.4 Asia-Pacific 31.5 2012' 48.0 15.1 Europe 22.2 2013' 50.8 16 Americas (excluding U.S.) 4.0 2014' 53.5 16.8 Total 100.0% nearly 60 percent of alternative beverage sales in 2009, while vitamin-enhanced drinks and energy drinks accounted for about 23 percent and 18 percent of 2009 alternative beverage sales, respectively. Exhibit 3 presents alternative beverage dollar value and volume sales for 2005 through 2009 and forecasts for alternative beverage sales for 2010 through 2014. Exhibits 4-7 present statistics on the relative sizes of the regional markets for alternative beverages. Exhibit 3 Dollar Value and Volume Sales of the Global Market for Alternative Beverages, 2005-2009, with Forecasts tor 2010-2014 .. : "Forecast, Source: Global Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor, April 2010. Even though energy drinks, sports drinks, and vitamin-enhanced drinks were all categorized as alternative beverages, the consumer profile varied substantially across the three types of beverages. While the profile of an energy drink consumer was a teenage boy, sports drinks were most frequently purchased by those who engaged in sports, fitness, or other strenuous activities such as outdoor manual labor jobs. It was quite common for teens to consume sports drinks after practicing or participating in school sports events and for manual laborers to consume sports drinks on hot days. Vitamin-enhanced beverages could substitute for sports drinks but were frequently purchased by adult consumers interested in increasing their intakes of vitamins. Even though enhanced waters offered potential benefits, there Source: Global Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor, April 2010,and United States Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor,April 2010. C-78 Part 2 Cases in Crafting and Executing Strategy Exhibit 5 Dollar Value and Volume Sales of the U.S. Market for Alternative Beverages, 2005-2009, with Forecasts for 2010-2014 .. ; Exhibit 7 Volume Sales and Dollar Value of the European Alternative Beverages Market, 2005-2009, with Forecasts for 2010-2014 2005 $9.2 2.8 2005 $7.4 1.27 2006 12.4 3.3 2006 7.8 1.34 2007 14.8 3.7 2007 8.2 143 2008 15.9 4.0 2008 8.6 151 2009 17.0 4.2 2009 9.1 160 2010' 18.2 4.5 2010" 9.5 169 2011" 19.5 4.7 2011' 9.9 1.78 2012" 20.8 5.0 2012" 10.4 188 2013" 22.2 5.3 2013" 10.8 1.98 2014" 23.6 5.5 2014* 11.3 2.08 "Forecast. Source: United States Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor,April 2010. were some features of enhanced waters that might cause consumers to limit their consumption of such products, including the need for sweeteners to disguise the taste of added vitamins and Exhibit 6 Volume Sales and Dollar Value of the Asia-Pacific Alternative Beverages Market, 2005-2009, Forecasts for 2010-2014 ,. ; 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010* 2011" 2012' 2013" 2014* $10.2 10.7 11.2 12.0 12.7 13.5 14.3 14.9 15.7 16.5 4.80 5.10 5.44 5.81 6.20 6.63 7.09 7.41 7.82 8.23 "Forecast. Source: Asia-Pacific Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor,April 2010. ·Forecast. Source: Europe Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor, April 2010. supplements. As a result, calorie counts for vitamin-enhanced beverages ranged from 20 calories per 16-ounce serving for Propel to 100 calories per 16-ounce serving for glaceau vitaminwater, In addition, some medical researchers had suggested that consumers would need to drink approximately 10 bottles of enhanced water each day to meet minimum dietary requirements for the vitamins promoted on the waters' labels. Distribution and Sale Of Alternative Beverages Consumers could purchase most alternative beverages in supermarkets, supercenters, natural foods stores, wholesale clubs, and convenience stores. Convenience stores were a particularly important distribution channel for alternative beverages since sports drinks, vitamin-enriched drinks, and energy drinks were usually purchased for immediate consumption. In fact, convenience stores accounted for about 75 percent of energy drink sales in 2010. Although energy drinks were typically purchased in convenience stores, sports drinks and vitamin-enhanced beverages were also available in most delis and many restaurants, from vending machines, and sometimes at sporting events Case 5 Competition in Energy Drinks, Sports Drinks, and Vitamin-Enhanced Beveraqes and other special events like concerts, outdoor festivals, and carnivals. Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola's soft drink businesses aided the two companies in making alternative beverages available in supermarkets, supercenters, wholesale clubs, and convenience stores. Soft drink sales were important to all types of food stores since soft drinks made up a sizable percentage of the store's sales and since food retailers frequently relied on soft drink promotions to generate store traffic. Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola were able to encourage their customers to purchase items across its product line to ensure prompt and complete shipment of key soft drink products. Smaller producers typically used third parties like beer and wine distributors or food distributors to make sales and deliveries to supermarkets, convenience store buyers, and restaurants and delis. Most distributors made deliveries of alternative beverages to convenience stores and restaurants along with their regular scheduled deliveries of other foods and beverages. Because of the difficulty for food service distributors to restock vending machines and provide alternative beverages to special events, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola were able to dominate such channels since they could make deliveries of sports drinks and vitamin-enhanced drinks along with their deliveries of carbonated soft drinks. CocaCola and Pepsi-Cola's vast beverage distribution systems made it easy for the two companies to make Gatorade, SoBe, Powerade, and glaceau vitamin water available anywhere Coke or Pepsi could be purchased. C-79 Convenience stores were aggressive in pressing alternative beverage producers and food distributors for low prices and slotting fees. Most: convenience stores carried only two to four brands of alternative beverages beyond what was distributed by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, and required sellers to pay annual slotting fees in return for providing bottle facings on a cooler shelf Food and beverage distributors usually allowed alternative beverage producers to negotiate slotting fees and any rebates directly with convenience store buyers. There was not as much competition among producers of sports drinks and vitamin-enhanced drinks to gain shelf space in delis and restaurants, since volume was relatively low-making per unit distribution costs exceedingly high unless other beverages were delivered along with alternative beverages. PepsiCo and Coca-Cola were: among the better-suited alternative beverage pro·, ducers to economically distribute sports drinks and vitamin-enhanced beverages to restaurants, since they likely provided fountain drinks to such establishments. Exhibit 8 presents worldwide and regional market shares for the three largest producers of alternative beverages in 2009. Distributors for the leading energy drink brands sold in the United States are listed in Exhibit 9. Suppliers to the Industry The suppliers to the alternative beverage industry included the makers of such nutritive and non-nutritive ingredients as sugar, aspartame, fructose, glucose, natural and artificial flavoring, Exhibit 8 Worldwide and Regional Market Shares for the Three Largest Producers of Alternative Beverages, 2009 PepsiCo 26.5% 47.8% 12.4 12.9% Coca-Cola 11.5 10.2 13.7 n.a. Red Bull 7.0 10.6 n.a. 10.1 Others 55.0 31.5 73.9 77.0 -- -- -- Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% n.a. = Not available Sources: Global Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor, April 2010; United States Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor, April 2010; Asia-Pacific Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor, April 2010; and Europe Functional Drinks Industry Profile, Datamonitor, April 2010. Jessita StupaJf$ p8rsonaI copy C-80 Part 2 Cases in Crafting and Executing Strategy Exhibit 9 Market Shares forthe Leading Energy Drink Brands in the United States, 2006-2009 Red Bull Independent 43% 35% 40% 40% Monster Coca-Cola 15 27 23 27 Rockstar PepsiCo 11 11 12 8 NOS Coca-Cola n.a. 2 2 4 Amp PepsiCo 4 5 8 3 DoubleShot PepsiCo n.a. n.a. 2 3 Full Throttle Coca-Cola 7 7 4 2 Others 20 13 9 13 Total 100% 100% 100% 100% n.a. = Not available. Sources: "2010State of the Industry Report;' Beverage World, April 2010;BevNET.com. artificial colors, caffeine, taurine, glucuronolactone, niacin, sodium, potassium, chloride, and other nutritional supplements. Suppliers to the industry also included the manufacturers of aluminum cans, plastic bottles and caps, label printers, and secondary packaging suppliers. While unique supplements like taurine might be available from only a few sources, most packaging supplies needed for the production of alternative beverages were readily available for a large number of suppliers. The numerous suppliers of secondary packaging materials (e.g., cardboard boxes, shrink-wrap, six-pack rings, printed film or paper labels) aggressively competed for the business of large alternative beverage producers. All but the largest sellers of alternative beverages contracted procurement and production activities to contract bottlers who produced energy drinks and other alternative beverages to the sellers' specifications. Key Competitive Capabilities in the Alternative Beverages Market Product innovation had been among the most important competitive features of the alternative beverage industry since the introduction of Gatorade in 1967. Alternative beverages competed on the basis of differentiation from traditional drinks such as carbonated soft drinks or fruit juices and were also positioned within their respective segments on the basis of differentiation. For example, all energy drink brands attempted to develop brand loyalty based on taste, the energy-boosting properties of their ingredients, and image. An energy drink's image was a factor of its brand name and packaging, clever ads, endorsements from celebrities and extreme sports athletes, and sponsorships of extreme sports events and music concerts. Differentiation among vitaminenhanced beverages tended to center 011 brand name and packaging, advertising, unique flavors, and nutritional properties. Because of the importance of brand recognition, successful sellers of alternative beverages were required to possess well-developed brand-building skills. The industry's largest sellers were global food and beverage companies-having built respected brands in snack foods, soft drinks, and fruit juices prior to entering the alternative beverage industry. Alternative beverage sellers also needed to have efficient distribution systems to supermarket and convenience store channels to be successful in the industry. It was imperative for alternative beverage distributors (whether direct store delivery by bottlers or delivery by third-parties) to maximize the number of deliveries per driver since distribution included high fixed costs for warehouses, trucks, handheld inventory tracking devices, and labor. It was also critical for distributors and sellers to provide on-time deliveries and offer responsive customer service to large Case 5 Competition in Energy Drinks, Sports Drinks, and Vitamin-Enhanced Beverages C-SJ customers. Also, volume and market share were key factors in keeping marketing expenses at an acceptable per-unit level. Recent Trends in the Alternative Beverage Market Despite the impact of the ongoing U.S. recession on the entire beverage industry, alternative beverage producers were optimistic about prospects for the industry. Demand was expected to grow worldwide as consumer purchasing power increased, and even though volume was down in the United States for sports drinks and vitaminenhanced drinks, alternative beverages offered profit margins much higher than those of other beverages. Innovation in brands, flavors, and formulations was expected to be necessary for supporting premium pricing and volume increases. Industry analysts believed that such exotic flavors as cardamom, hibiscus, and cupuacu might prove to be hits in 2011 and 2012. The emergence of two-ounce energy shots sold on convenience store counters had proved to be an important growth category for the industry. TI1e category was created with the introduction of Living Essentials' 5-Hour Energy in 2004. 5-Hour Energy contained amino acids and taurine plus 2,000 percent of the daily requirement for vitamin B6 , 8,333 percent of the daily requirement for B12, and 100 milligrams of caffeine (the equivalent of a cup of coffee). By comparison, the caffeine content of energy drinks ranged from 160 milligrams for Red Bull to 240 milligrams for Rockstar Punched. Unlike energy drinks that focused on teens, energy shots were targeted to office workers, parents, and other adults who might need a boost of energy during a demanding day. Red Bull, Coca-Cola's NOS, Hansen's Monster, PepsiCo's Amp, and Rockstar had all developed competing energy shots, but none were a serious threat to Living Essentials' 5-Hour Energy in 2010. 5-Hour Energy held an 85 percent market share in the category in 2009. Exhibit 10 presents annual revenues for the top five energy shot brands in the United States in 2009. Analysts believed that Europe, Australia, South America, and the Middle East were attractive markets for the expansion-minded makers of energy shots. Unlike carbonated soft drinks, the caffeine content of energy shots and energy drinks was £xhibit 10 Annual Revenues for the Top Five Energy Shot Brands in the United States, 2009 5-Hour Energy Stacker2 6-Hour Power Red Bull Energy Shot Monster Hitman NOS Energy Shot $494.6 30.4 22.1 19.7 11.8 +58.6% +32.9 n.a. +611.7 -10.4 n.a. = Not available Source: Beverage World 2010 State of the Industry Report, Apri12010. not regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and could contain as much caffeine as the producer thought appropriate. There was concern among some health professionals over the high caffeine content of energy drinks and the effects of large doses of caffeine on individuals, especially children. The most significant health problems related to high caffeine consumption were heart arrhythmia and insomnia. It was not unheard of for adults with heart arrhythmias to be admitted to emergency rooms after consuming three or more energy drinks in one day. Also, physicians attributed a New Mexico man's appendicitis and gallstones to excessive consumption of energy drinks. Physicians also warned that the combination of energy drinks and over-thecounter drugs such as NoDoz could cause seizures. However, clinical studies had shown that, in moderate doses, caffeine contributed to healthy weight loss, was an effective treatment for asthma and headaches and reduced the risk of Parkinson's disease, depression, colon cancer, and type 2 diabetes. As a precaution, Monster Energy placed the following warning on its labels: "Limit 3 cans per day, not recommended for children, pregnant women or people sensitive to caffeine." I There was also concern over the tendency of some individuals to mix alcohol with energy drinks. It was not uncommon at all for partiers to use energy drinks as a mixer to help offset the depressive effects of alcohol and keep their energy levels high throughout the evening. It was Jessica Sfupak's:per5bitaI·coPl C-82 Part 2 Cases in Crafling and Executing Strategy estimated that more than 25 percent of collegeage drinkers mixed alcohol with energy drinks. The frequency of the practice led MillerCoors to develop an alcohol energy drink that contained caffeine, taurine, guarana, and ginseng in addition to alcohol. Anheuser-Busch sold two similar drinks called Tilt and Bud Extra. Both companies removed the caffeine from the drinks after attorneys general in several states had written the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ask that the federal government force the removal of the products from the market. The attorneys general argued that the addition of caffeine to alcohol masked a drinker's level of intoxication and could lead to "increased risk-taking and other serious alcohol related problems such as traffic accidents, violence, sexual assault, and suicide.=' The relaxation drink niche within the alternative beverage industry also caused some concern among health professionals and members of law enforcement. Relaxation drinks such as Vacation in a Bottle (ViB) and Dream Water contained the hormone melatonin, which was produced by humans, plants, and animals and had many known and unknown effects on the human body. Melatonin had been associated with rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep and was used by some as a supplement to help treat insomnia. A Harvard Medical School sleep expert warned against the consumption of relaxation drinks by stating that hormones "should not be put in beverages, since the amount people drink often depends on thirst and taste rather than being taken only when needed like any other drug.t" Kava and valerian root were two other common ingredients of relaxation drinks; the FDA warned against the use of kava and had not approved valerian root as a food additive. Controversy also surrounded some relaxation drinks because of their association with the abuse of prescription cough syrup. The practice of mixing a prescription cough syrup whose ingredients included promethazine and codeine with Sprite or other carbonated soft drinks had become common in some inner-city areas, especially in southern U.S. states. The purple-colored cough syrup drink, which was commonly called "purple drank" or "sizzurp," was said to have been originated by Houston, Texas, disc jockey and rapper DJ Screw, who died from an overdose of purple drank in 2000. Purple drank was frequently mentioned in hip-hop and rap songs such as those performed by Three 6 Mafia, Eminem, Lil'Wyte, Lil Boosie, Mike Jones, Lil' Wayne, Ludacris, T.I., and Kanye West. The use of sizzurp was also a problem in professional sports, and possession of the controlled substances used to make sizzurp had led to the arrests of a number of professional athletes, including Green Bay Packers defensive lineman Johnny Jolly and former Oakland Raiders quarterback JaMarcus Russell. Legal authorities believed that the purple-colored relaxation drinks Drank and Purple Stuff attempted to exploit the street use of purple drank. Innovative Beverage Group, the maker of Drank, had built its marketing plan on product placements in rap and hip-hop videos and launched a competition in summer 2010 that would award prizes to those who wrote the best new rap songs about the company's product. PROFILES OFTHE LEADING ALTERNATIVE BEVERAGE PRODUCERS PepsiCo In 2010, PepsiCo was the world's fourth-largest food and beverage company, with 2009 sales of about $43 billion. The company's brands were sold in more than 200 countries and included such well-known names as Lay's, Tostitos, Cheetos, Mountain Dew, Pepsi, Doritos, Lipton Iced Tea, Tropicana, Aquafina, SoBe, Gatorade, Quaker, and Cracker Jack. The company held commanding market shares in many of the food and beverage categories where it competed. In 2009, it was the number one seller of beverages in the United States and its Frito-Lay division was four times as large as the next-largest seller of snacks in the United States. PepsiCo had upset Coca-Cola to become the largest seller of beverages in the United States, not by seiling more carbonated soft drinks than Coke (Coca-Cola was the largest seller of carbonated soft drinks in 2009), but by leading in most other beverage categories. For example, Aquafina was the best-selling brand of water in the United States, Frappuccino was the number one brand of ready-to-drink coffee, Tropicana was ranked first in orange juice sales, Case 5 Competition in Energy Drinks, Sports Drinks, and Vitamin-Enhanced Beverages and Gatorade held a commanding lead in sports drinks. The company's strength in noncarbonated beverages made it the world's largest seller of alternative beverages, with a global market share in 2009 of 26.5 percent. PepsiCo held more than a 2-to-l worldwide market-share lead over industry runner-up, Coca-Cola, which had a global market share in alternative beverages of I 1.5 percent in 2009. However, PepsiCo's greatest strength was in the United States, where it held a 47.8 percent share of the total alternative beverage market in 2009. PepsiCo's best-selling alternative beverages included Gatorade (which held a 75 percent share of the $1.57 billion U.S. sports drink market), Propel, SoBe Lifewater, and Amp Energy. PepsiCo produced 12 flavors of Amp Energy drinks and two flavors of No Fear energy drinks. Its SoBe brand included both energy drinks and vitaminenhanced drinks. In 2010, PepsiCo bottled and marketed 2 varieties of SoBe Adrenaline Rush energy drinks and 28 varieties of SoBe vitaminenhanced beverages. PespiCo also marketed a line of DoubleShot Energy drinks that complemented its Starbucks Frappuccino drink line. The company expanded its lineup of alternative drinks in 2009 with the launch of Charge, C-83 a lemon-flavored energy drink containing L-carnitine; Rebuild, a black tea drink fortified with amino acids and antioxidants; Defend, a drink fortified with antioxidants and betaalanine; and Bloodshot, a juice drink containing 150 percent of the daily recommended dosage of vitamins Band C. The company also had a multiyear distribution agreement with Rockstar to distribute