its research assignment and i will send my assesment 2 as well
Assessment 4 Assessment type: Individual Research Plan. Written proposal – approximately 3,500 words Note: Other than in exceptional circumstances, Assessment 4 of this subject is intended to form the basis of the student’s Research Project in BUS710 Research Project, following appropriate adjustments recommended in feedback. Purpose: This assessment is designed to allow students to present and justify appropriate method(s) for a research project designed to address the research questions listed in A2. This assessment relates to learning outcomes a, b and d. Value: Written Proposal 40% Presentation (5 minutes including question time.) 10% Total 50% Due Date:Written proposal - Week 10, Saturday by 11.59pm Presentations in class during tutorials - Week 11 or Week 12 Submission: Written Proposal – upload a soft copy – Word .doc or .docx to Moodle and Turnitin via links in Moodle. Oral Presentations – in class. Students are to hand a hard copy of their visual aids to the teacher at the beginning of class. Assessment topic: Business Research Proposal Task Details: There are two components of the assessment: Written Proposal (40%) and Presentation, 5 minutes (10%). Based on Research Questions developed in Assessment 2, students should develop a research design aimed at providing insight and/or answers to the question. Students should make any recommended adjustment to the content of Assessment 2, based on the feedback, prior to including it in Assessment 4. This assessment required students to choose and justify the most suitable research design, clearly explaining WHY the chosen design will best answer the research question and is most suitable in the specific circumstances. Students should clearly justify their recommended research and analysis methods. Written Proposal: the proposal will contain the following information: · Title page: including research title and student’s details · Abstracts: A brief summary of key information about the research (the research questions, the theory used and methodology plan). · Research Background (revision version of Assessment 2) · Research Questions and Research objectives (revision version of Assessment 2) · Literature review (based on Assessment 3 – structured literature review), minimum 20 peer-reviewed articles (including the four main articles used in Assessment 3) · Research Design: describe type of research, research approach, type of data, data collection methods, data analysis methods and sampling plan. · Ethical Consideration : address the five ethical consideration of human · research Marks out of 40 will be awarded based on how well the following criteria is addressed: Criteria % Marks Research Background, Research Questions and Research Objectives: adjustment to Assessment 2 and Assessment 3 elements based on feedback provided 10% Addresses each of the elements of the proposal (refer to the proposal structure) 10% Literature review: critically review the theoretical foundation of the research. 30% Research Design: discuss and justify the choice of research methodology 30% Ethical Consideration: discuss five ethical research principles 10% References and referencing skills: Present the research plan in a professional manner with correct referencing 10% Marking Rubric for BUS707 Applied Business Research Assessment 4: Research Proposal, written proposal – 40% Criteria Fail (0 – 49%) Pass (50 – 64%) Credit (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) High Distinction (85 – 100%) Research Background, Research Objectives and Research Questions (adjustment from A2 and A3) (10 marks) Background details are a random collection of information, largely unclear or not related to the topic. Research questions an objectives are significantly incomplete or unclear. No adjustment based on A2 and A3 feedback Background contains some irrelevant & unclear information. Research questions an objectives are linked and relevant with the topic. There is reasonable adjustment based on A2 and A3 feedback. Background is generally well-written & provides a reasonable context. Research Questions and research objectives are straightforward and satisfactorily linked, with an adequate adjustment based on A2 and A3 feedback Background is well-written & clearly provides the context. Research questions an research objectives are clear and convincing explanation of the linked between the two of them reasons, with a good adjustment based on A2 and A3 feedback Background is insightful, perceptive & illuminating. Research questions and research objectives are excellently explained with a strong connection between them & written with very good insights. Excellent adjustment based on A2 and A3 feedback. Proposal elements (10 marks) Not all the required elements of the proposal are addressed All of the required elements of the proposal are addressed, however, discussion is very theoretical and lack of empirical/practical discussion. All of the required elements of the proposal are addressed, theoretical and practical discussion is presented with limited details All of the required elements of the proposal are addressed, theoretical and practical discussion is presented with good details All of the required elements of the proposal are addressed, theoretical and practical discussion is presented with excellent details Literature Review (30 marks) Literature section does not review the theory, it is only a list of summary from a number of differences references Literature section provide review of the literature, the variables discussed are clear however, it does not structure from general to specific. Literature section provide review of the literature, the variables discussed are clear however and it is structured from general to specific. However, the detail of discussion of each variable is limited. Literature section provide review of the literature, the variables discussed are clear and it is structured from general to specific. The detail of discussion of each variable is reasonable Literature section provide review of the literature, the variables discussed are clear and it is structured from general to specific with excellent and comprehensive detail of discussion. Research Design (30 marks) There is no practical discussion on research design (type of research, research approach, type of data, data collection methods, data analysis methods and sampling plan) OR only theoretical description of each component in the research design. Research designs are discussed in respect of: type of research, research approach, type of data, data collection methods, data analysis methods and sampling plan) however, the discussion are more of theoretical discussion of the tools, no practical discussion. Research designs are practically discussed in respect of: type of research, research approach, type of data, data collection methods, data analysis methods and sampling plan), however, the choice of the methods are unsuitable for the research topic. Research designs are practically discussed in respect of: type of research, research approach, type of data, data collection methods, data analysis methods and sampling plan), the choice of the methods are suitable, however, there is limited justification for the choice. Research designs are practically discussed in respect of: type of research, research approach, type of data, data collection methods, data analysis methods and sampling plan), the choice of the methods are suitable and strongly justified. ( BUS707 ) ( BUS707 APPLIED BUSINESS RESESARCH T319 16/10/2019 14:55 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ) ( PAGE 18 OF 22 CRICOS 03171A ) ( ABN: 72 132 629 979 ) ( Approved by KOI Academic Board for T3 2019 ) Ethical Consideration (10 marks) There is no discussion on five ethical principle and/or demonstrate misunderstanding of the concept of ethics in human research. There is discussion on one to two ethical consideration and however, there is some misunderstanding of the concept of ethics in human research. There is discussion on three to four ethical consideration and demonstrate reasonable understanding of the concept of ethics in human research. There is discussion on five ethical consideration and demonstrate good understanding of the concept of ethics in human research. There is discussion on five ethical consideration and demonstrate excellent and comprehensive understanding of the concept of ethics in human research. Reference and referencing skills (10 marks) The proposal has less than twenty references and they do not meet the minimum requirement (2010 onward peer-reviewed articles) and has no in-text citations The proposal has 20 references but some of them do not meet the minimum requirement (2010 onward peer-reviewed articles) and has less than 10 in-text citation. The proposal has 20 references and most of them meet the minimum requirement (2010 onward peer-reviewed articles), however, only between 10 to 15 in-text citation are used. The proposal has 20 references and most of them meet the minimum requirement (2010 onward peer-reviewed articles), and between 15-20 in-text citation are used. The proposal has 20 references and all of them meet the minimum requirement (2010 onward peer- reviewed articles), and 20 in-text citation are used. Total marks out 100 Total Assessment Mark: /40