To complete this task you will need to discuss and critique relevant elements of the CPG and case study whilst upholding: • NSQHS and/or • NMBA standards and/or • National Palliative Care standards...

1 answer below »
its a case study essay of word1500


To complete this task you will need to discuss and critique relevant elements of the CPG and case study whilst upholding: • NSQHS and/or • NMBA standards and/or • National Palliative Care standards FAQ's Do we need to use all of these standards to do well? · As the rubric states if you provide "Outstanding knowledge of themes and principles associated with palliative care" this will demonstrate an outstanding application of your knowledge to practice therefore using standards from more than one of the above and relating them together to uphold your critique of the patient care and support the clinical practice guideline selected will demonstrate excellent knowledge and understanding.  Using one standard from one of the above will not provide strong application of knowledge. However, a comparison of multiple standards that as registered nurses we are required to uphold will absolutely demonstrate very strong knowledge and understanding, if you link them together well with evidence based practice (EBP) Where do I find all of these standards? You should be aware of all of the standards above as they have been discussed in many units throughout your degree, so now it is time to demonstrate your knowledge and bring them together.  to assist you We have provided links below to each of the standards we would like you to utilise in your critique. NSQHS Eight National safety and Quality Health Service Standards to provide a nationally consistent level of care that can be expected by all consumers from all health organisations  https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards NMBA Seven Standards that all Registered nurses must uphold to ensure that they maintain their registration and provide person centred and evidence based preventative, curative, supportive, formative and palliative elements to their practice  https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx National Palliative Care Standards Nine National palliative Care standards that you know well as they have formed the framework of NRSG374 and were fundamental for assessment task 1 https://palliativecare.org.au/standards How do I relate these standards to Frank's experiences as a patient? This is where your critical thinking and application of theory to practice is required, we cannot tell you how to do this, as a final year nursing unit is essential that you are aware of how all of these standards, uphold and maintain, patient centred care, dignity, patient assessment and safety to name a few.  Spend some time reviewing these and map out the ones that you believe are important for your critique. Consider the Patient Situation (Levett-Jones, 2018) Fortunato (Frank) Rossi, is a 60 year old male who was born in Italy and Migrated to Australia with his wife in 1952, both he and his 58 year old wife Sofia have dual citizenship in Italy and Australia. Frank and his wife practice a strong catholic faith. Frank has worked as a Secondary School Science and Mathematics teacher at a local Catholic Secondary School for over 20 years and loves his job.  He is well respected by his colleagues and students with his very "quick wit and sharp mind with problem solving" that he prides himself on Sofia has been a stay at home mother and carer for their 2 daughters: · Eldest Daughter: Anna married Phillip have 2 daughters Bella (6) and Emily (3 months) · Youngest Daughter: Gabriella married Michael have 1 son (18 months old) Together they have had a wonderful life, with supportive family visiting from Italy and the Rossi family themselves being able to go over to Italy for many family holidays.  Both Frank and Sofia are very excited and enjoying being grandparents, they are looking forward to Frank's decision for an early 'self funded retirement' to enjoy more time with the family. Frank has arranged with his school to be able to undertake a small amount of casual teaching if he and his family require some small income once he has retired, although he is very keen to work in his garden and spend time helping to raise the grandchildren and enjoy the many years of hard work that he and Sofia put in to support their family and the "good life" they have created in Australia. Three months ago Frank experienced some confusion at work and a seizure "of unknown origin" that was witnessed by his wife and grandchildren.  Sofia immediately called 000 and Frank was transported urgently under the care of paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a major metropolitan hospital as they lived close to the city. Collect Cues and Information (Levett-Jones 2018)   Past Medical Hx · Tonsillectomy as a child · Ex smoker (quit smoking 25 years ago was a packet a day smoker) · Diet Controlled type 2 Diabetes Current History · Seizures of unknown origin · Confusion · Headache · Blurred vision · Difficulties with problem solving and decision making · Gradual onset of speech disturbance · Muscle Weakness · Behaviour Changes · Vomiting · Sleepiness · sluggish pupil response to light Gathering new Information  Frank's vital signs upon admission to medical ward  RR : 18 HR: 84 bpm BP: 185/95 SaO2: 96% on 3Lmin via N/P (For Comfort measures) Raised Intracranial Pressure (ICP) - constant headache GCS - 9/15 (eyes open to painful stimuli 2 / confused and disorientated verbal response 4 / Abnormal Flexion from painful stimuli 3) Intermittent Patient Notes "Patient transferred to medical ward following observed seizure of unknown origin by wife and grandchildren who called 000 for paramedic support. In ED patient's conscious state was altered with confusion and inability to recognise wife" "Pupil size of both eyes was equal however pupillary light reflex is sluggish, positive babinski sign response bilaterally, renal function normal, patient experiencing double incontinence, normal FBE and U&E" "Initial MRI clearly showed abnormalities in the frontal and temporal regions, with a differential diagnosis of metastatic tumors in the brain from an unknown primary" Frank was experiencing Increased Intracranial Pressure likely from brain lesions and possible Diagnosis of a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Differential Diagnoses had not yet been ruled out  "Patient was administered mannitol every 12/24 over 16 days to reduce Intra Cranial Pressure (ICP,) Lyrica 150mg BD for seizure activity, and Diazepam 10mg PRN..... 5 days post initial seizure pt woke with normal cognitive responses and recognition of family members once ICP had begun to reduce. Progressively pt's ability to walk without deficit returned. Pt was fully continent, had good long term memory recollection, however short term memory was impacted" "Pt's oral mucosa had multiple abrasions and thrush evident from possible injury during seizure, patient complained of mouth and throat pain, often refusing to eat and drink" "Differential Diagnoses of ?Infection, ?metastaic cerebral tumors were discussed however following lumbar puncture for collection of cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) specimen, and  further MRI results  showing rapid tumor growth particularly in Frank's frontal lobe just 18 days after his initial ED presentation, the diagnosis was highly indicative of a GBM" "Patient and wife agreed to surgical tumor resection as a palliative measure with the knowledge that this was not a cure. Histopathology post surgical resection clearly identified a rapidly growing GBM with temporal lobe metastases as the definitive diagnosis. A family meeting was arranged with the neurosurgeon, oncologist, palliative consultant, social worker, nurse unit manager, Frank and his family to discuss options" Confirmed Diagnosis, medical imaging and  histopathology results Following  CT Brain and MRI it was concluded that Frank had a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) in his frontal lobe which had likely metastasized in both temporal lobes, thus his prognosis was devastatingly a Stage IV GBM with a likely survival of 2 - 3 months without surgical resection and/or palliative radiation therapy. "Family advised to discuss and complete an Advanced Care Directive whilst Frank was competent with the knowledge that his ICP was likely to increase again, and a decision on how to proceed with interventions was needed.  Palliative radiotherapy was offered to Frank, he and his wife refused and decided to be transferred to an inpatient palliative care unit closer to their family where he could go home on day visits and also spend more time with his family at the palliative care unit, rather than in a busy medical ward"  Whilst on Day leave Frank had another seizure and was transferred back to the General Ward for review …..Frank has now spent some time in a general medical ward at the Tertiary Level City Hospital that he was originally transferred to by ambulance 2 weeks ago following another seizure whilst he was at home during a visit there from the palliative care unit.  During his re-admission the following cues and information were collected and a diagnosis made. Prior to his transfer and re- admission back to the palliative care unit in an outer city hospital closer to his family home   Processing Information Arrival and Admission to the Palliative Care Unit Frank expressed some personal family history and wishes for his disease progression  "Frank informed medical and nursing staff that his father had died from a GBM, restless, undignified crawling on the floor from terminal restlessness and his only desire was to not die like his father had" "Nil Advanced Care Directive had been completed with Frank and Sofia as they thought they still had plenty of time when informed about an ACD on the Medical Ward. However, with Frank's fluctuating ICP and disorientation he is now deemed incompetent for any legal decisions or changes to his Will" "Sofia was Frank's medical Power of Attorney, presenting paperwork to support this to the admitting palliative Care Team" "Sofia stayed with Frank during his admission and together they communicated that they wanted him to be comfortable and dignified" Medications Commenced once reviewed by Palliative Care Team · Dexamethasone: 8mg BD oral or S/C (0800 and 1400) - To aid in reduction of ICP and Pain Relief from headache (Consider side effects and behavioural changes from dexamethasone - How can these be managed?) · Lyrica : 75mg BD Oral (0800 and 2000) -  To manage seizure activity (consider side effects of Lyrica, are there other options that could be considered for Frank?) · MS Contin 10mg BD Oral (0800 and 2000hrs) -  Analgesia PRN Medications · Morphine 5-10mg S/C · Midazolam 2.5-5mg s/c · Ondansetron 8mg wafer (maximum dose of 16mg in 24 hours ) for nausea and vomiting Upon arrival and admission to the palliative care unit the following referrals were made  ·  Physiotherapist review for assessment of walking aid due to increasing parasethsia and weakness in Frank's legs · OT home assessment and equipment for home visits · Dietician to review loss of appetite, cachexia and anorexia · Pastoral care  · Catholic Priest visits and wish to be anointed ASAP Identifying problems/issues Considerations for the Palliative Care Setting Frank arrived on the Palliative Care unit late on a Sunday afternoon at 2pm, he was welcomed by his RN who undertook the following assessments and discussions between him, his wife and two daughters: · Welcome and orientation to the ward · Falls Risk Assessment  · Braden Pressure Risk Assessment · Pain Assessment  · Allied Health Referrals made · NOK contact details · Modified Karnofsky Score of 40-50 · RUG- ADL 10+ · SAS Tool Partially Completed 5 of the 7 symptoms only (planned to discuss fatigue and bowel issues tomorrow as patient was sleepy and Sofia had gone home to get clothes and come back to sleep the night at the palliative care unit · Palliative Care Phase -  "Deteriorating" What might be some things I need to consider as an RN caring for Frank and his family ? ·
Answered Same DayOct 15, 2021NRSG374

Answer To: To complete this task you will need to discuss and critique relevant elements of the CPG and case...

Jose answered on Oct 18 2021
144 Votes
The University of Queensland
1
MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
Health Care
Individual
Lecturer:
Student Submitting:
Due Date: 15/10/2020
Abstract
The registered nurse has to provide quality services to the patients at, right time. While providing services to patients, healthcare professionals have to consider different standards and rules. American Acade
my of Family Physicians developed evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and based on the situations the healthcare professionals have to apply the same (Harvey et al 2016,p.375). In the research paper, we are analysing the problems faced by the patient Frank and we are also analysing the importance of clinical practice guidelines. The research paper also focused on the importance of the NSQHSS, NMBA standards and Palliative Care standards.
Application of CPGs
Clinical practice guidelines are used for ensuring better care and service to the patients. For implementing clinical practice guidelines, we required the support of sophisticated tools and methods. Healthcare professionals have to give more importance to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. While analysing the case of Frank, we can understand that for reducing the health problems faced by the Frank we can use the following clinical practise guidelines;
1. Organ and Tissue Donation
While analysing the case of Frank we can understand that Frank was at the IV stage of GBM. As per UNO guidelines GBM patients are permitted to transfer the organ or tissue. Cancer Council Australia (2019) clearly states that for donating the organs of the patient the healthcare professionals have to get permission from the patient (Weber et al 2019,p.12). For donating the organ or tissue of the Frank the healthcare professionals have to conduct a careful evaluation. If the healthcare professionals understand the organ that can use, it has to be informed to the family members of Frank. Rules and regulations related to the donation of organ and tissue of GBM patient still a controversial issue. After all the evaluation, if the healthcare professionals identified that organs of Frank are not useful, corneas of Frank (Only after getting the permission of family members) can be taken and it will be helpful for other patients. From the case study, it is clear that family members of Frank were so attached to him and for the organ and tissue donation, the healthcare professionals have to get full consent from the family members, especially from his wife. As per the report of National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (2020) death certificate has been completed for starting the procedure of tissue or organ donation (Toohey et al 2020, p.108)
2. Managing Psychological Issues inclusive of Terminal Restlessness
From the case study, it is clear that Frank has shown the symptoms and signs of Terminal Restlessness. He already informed the healthcare professionals that his father was died due to GBM and he faced Terminal Restlessness. While analysing the case study we can understand that anxiety, agitation and confusion was the major problem faced by Frank before death. Anxiety, agitation and confusion called as the major symptoms of Terminal Restlessness (Portman 2019,p.649). From the case study, it is clear that long term use of medication and emotional turmoil also called as the major reason for the terminal restlessness faced by Frank. It is the duty of the medical team or the registered to nurse to help the patient to be calm and keep them safe (Rosa et al 2020,p.64). From the case study, it is clear that the patient is not interested to have food and medicines and he interested be at home. As per the report of National Health and Medical...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here