ITECH7413- SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT TEAM ASSIGNMENTWEIGHTING: 25% (15% for the report and 10% for the presentation) TASK and Due WeekGroup Presentation (Due Date - Week 10 – Allocated Laboratory)Learning Outcomes Assessed: K4, K5, S1, A1, A2, V1, V2Group Report (Due Date – Week 11 Sunday 11:55pm)Learning Outcomes Assessed: K1, K2, K3, K4, S1, A1, A2, V1, V2Group Members: Min Three and Max four members in the group ( please contact Lead Lecturer/ Lecturer or Coordinator if only two people left after all groups in the lab; Students must be from the same lab to form a group)DETAILSWrite a research report of about 3000 words focusing on one of the following topics1. How to reach next level of supply chain by AI, IoT and Blockchain?2. How blockchain architectures streamline accounting for supply chain ?3. How machine learning can transform the Supply Chain?The report should be well researched and written in accordance with APA referencing style.REQUIREDForm a group of between 4 members. The following are the deliverables in this project:1. Each group is expected to choose one of the above topics and write a research report of about3000 words.2. Each report should referenced a minimum of 15 peer reviewed journal articles and conferencepapers.3. Final deliverable consists of a presentation (10%) in week 10 and a research report (15%) inweek 11.4. Presentation of your findings in this project would be of about 20-minute duration. 1
5. Every student is expected to submit a short report to their lecturer stating their contribution to their team. Lecturers reserve the right to reduce a student’s mark if their contribution to their team is deemed insubstantial.6. Each team is expected to present their report findings as part of the “Team Report Presentation” assessment task during week 10. You are reminded to read the “Plagiarism” section of the course description. Your essay should be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words.7. All reports must use the APA referencing style. University Referencing/Citation Style Guide:The University has published a style guide to help students correctly reference and cite information they use in assignments (American Psychological Association (APA) citation style, http://www.ballarat.edu.au/aasp/student/learning_support/generalguide/print/ch06s04.shtmlor Australian citation style8. Reports are to be presented in hard copy in size 12 Arial Font and doublespaced. Your report should include a list of references used in the essay and a bibliography of the wider reading you have done to familiarize yourself on the topic.9. Report Submission: Hard-copy to tutors/lecturers assignment box in week11.Double- sided printing for the hard-copy is encouraged in order to save paper. Declaration should be done to declare how much (percentage) each of the team has contributed to the report.10. A passing grade will be awarded to assignments adequately addressing all assessment criteria. Higher grades require better quality and more effort. For example, a minimum is set on the wider reading required. A student reading vastly more than this minimum will be better prepared to discuss the issues in depth and consequently their report is likely to be of a higher quality. So before submitting, please read through the assessment criteria very carefully.2
Team Report – Marks 100 Weighting: 15 % for Team ReportStudent IDs:Assessment Criteria:ScorePresentation /Layout/05 marksStructure/10 marks Introduction/10 marksDiscussion of Topics/50 marks Conclusion/15 marks Referencing/10 marksSubTotal-/100 marksTotal out of 15 Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (0) Information is well organized, well written, and proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout. Correct layout used. Information is organized, well written, with proper grammarand punctuation. Correct layout used. Information is somewhat organized, proper grammar and punctuation mostly used. Correct layout used.Information is osorgmaenwizheadt, but proper grammar and punctuation not always used. Some elements olafyout incorrect. Structure guidelines Enhanced Structure guidelines followed exactly Structure guidelines mostly followed. Some elements of structure omitted Introduces the topic of the report in an extremely engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives a detailed general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Introduces the topic of the report in an engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest.Gives some general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Satisfactorily introduces the topic of the report. Gives a general background.Indicates the overall "plan" of the paper.Introduces the topic of the report, but omits a general background of the topic and/or the overall "plan" of the paper. All topics discussed in depth. Displays deep analysis of issues with no irrelevant info. Consistently detailed discussion. Displays sound understanding with some analysis of issues and no irrelevant Information Most topics are adequately discussed. Displays some understanding and analysis of issues. Inadequate discussion of issues Little/no demonstrated understanding or analysis of most issues and/or some irrelevant information. An interesting, well written summary of the main points.An excellent final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. A good summary of the main points.A good final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. Satisfactory summary of the main points.A final comment on the subject, but introduced new material.Poor/no summary of the main points.A poor final comment othne subject and/or new material introduced. Correct referencing (APA). All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Correctly set out reference list. Mostly correct referencing (APA). All quoted material in Quotes & acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged.Mostly correct setting out reference list. Mostly correct referencing (APA ) Some problems with quoted material and paraphrased material Some problems with the reference list.Not all material correctly acknowledged.Some problems with trheeference list. 3
Team Report Presentation – Marks 100 Weighting: 10% for Team PresentationStudents are expected to create and present a 10-15 minute overview of the findings from their Team Report.Student IDs:Assessment Criteria: Criteria Marks Introduction /10 Content/40 Conclusion /10 Presentation Style e.g. clarity, engagement /20 Team participation/10 Timing (10-15 minutes) /10 SubTotal-2 /100 General Comments: Team assignment Total = SubTotal-1 + SubTotal-2.4