It must have an introduction which states all relevant issues. The body section must include headings for each issue discussed. Include a brief conclusion at the end of each issue. There must be a...

1 answer below »
It must have an introduction which states all relevant issues. The body section must include headings for each issue discussed. Include a brief conclusion at the end of each issue. There must be a section for the main conclusion.Footnote and Bibliography (AGLC Referencing Style)IRAC/ILAC rule must be applied.The possible topics relevant to the assignment are:- Formation of contract- Terms of contract- Misrepresentation & Misrepresentation under s 18 Australian Consumer Law- Discharge of contract and remedies


Alice is an avid player of board games and is founder and managing director of the League of Serious Gamers Pty Ltd (LSG). Every year Alice travels to London to attend the International Convention of Board Game Players where she mixes with fellow enthusiasts, see the many displays and experiences different board games. She usually returns with new or collector board games that she has purchased and which she, then, on-sells at a profit to her customers as part of LSG’s inventory. LSG also publish a free newsletter highlighting news items on board games and products. This newsletter goes to members who are part of the LSG’s customer loyalty program. This year Alice bought an ornate chess set which, she was told by the seller, was once owned by Emperor Franz Joseph of the Astro-Hungarian Empire. Alice placed the following entry in the latest edition of the newsletter: Gamers, a special and rare find this time! Emperor Franz Joseph’s chess board and pieces. $25,000 for this piece of history. Preston Posh is a wealthy collector of rare historical pieces. He was in the bedroom of his son, Peter, a member of LSG’s customer loyalty program, giving some advice to him about doing an MBA. After speaking to Peter, he noticed the LSG newsletter on his desk, which had been opened at the advertisement section, and saw the entry about the chess set. Preston knew that the Franz Joseph chess set was a much sought after historical piece. However, he thought that the chess set was in the collection of an American buyer, and in any event would be worth more than $25,000. Nevertheless, he knew that it would make his business rival and fellow antique collector, Rooney Rabid, green with envy when Preston showed the set off as part of his collection. Preston quickly wrote down the phone number from the advertisement, arranged to meet Alice, inspected the chess set and paid her the money. Preston decided to host a grand evening party to which he invited other well-known collectors of historical pieces. His crowning moment was when he led Rooney Rabid over to show him the Franz Joseph chess set. However, his moment of triumph was destroyed when Rooney loudly proclaimed to Preston and the assembled audience:   “Oh, my dear Preston! Have you checked this out properly? That’s not the Franz Joseph chess set. I am currently the owner of the Franz Joseph chess set and have the authentication documents to prove it!  Where did you get this… some backstreet bazaar?” The evening party ended in a humiliating farce for Preston. Sitting alone after everybody had left, he suddenly felt a fit of anger rise and picked up the chess set and flung it against the wall. As a result, the chess board was cracked, and several chess pieces were badly chipped beyond repair. Preston reached for his phone and rang Alice. He blamed her for his humiliation and demanded his money back. Advise Alice on her legal position with regards to the contract made with Preston and whether he (Preston) could demand his money back (you may also assume that Rooney did own the true Franz Joseph chess set).
Answered 2 days AfterOct 14, 2021Swinburne University of Technology

Answer To: It must have an introduction which states all relevant issues. The body section must include...

Nishtha answered on Oct 17 2021
127 Votes
LEGAL WRITING
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Issues    3
Conclusion    5
References    6
Introduction
Alice is the founder and director of the League of Serious Gamers Pty Ltd, as well as a board game player (LSG). She purchases an elegant chess piece from a merchant. According to Section 18 of the Australian Cons
umer Law, a person must not participate in behaviour that is likely to mislead or deceive, or is liable to mislead, in carrying on a business. The purpose of Section 18 is to operate as a catch-all rule that can be used to address any type of inappropriate behaviour. The term "misleading or deceptive conduct" is not defined under Australian Consumer Law. The word has been interpreted by the courts to mean conduct that generally tend to lead a person or people to screw up. The purpose of Section 18 is to act as a catch-all rule that can be used to address any type of inappropriate behaviour. The clause has been widely interpreted in a wide range of cases involving varied factual conditions. As a result, the target audience for the portrayal must always be taken into account. The clause has been construed in a variety of contexts involving a variety of factual circumstances.
Issues
Conduct that is misleading or deceptive, or is misleading or deceptive, is prohibited under Section 18. This is a positive requirement; it is not a defence to be unaware of the accuracy of statements stated. This legislation relates even if Alice did not mean to deceive or mislead anybody, or if no one was harmed as a result of Alicer actions. A business might not always engage in action that intentionally or unintentionally misleads or misinforms clients or other companies, or is inclined to do so.
It is crucial to consider how a company's actions influence the public's perception of a product or service. The most crucial issue to ask when determining whether action is misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive, is whether the overall impression conveyed by Alicer conduct is incorrect or inaccurate. While a company is not compelled to reveal facts in all instances, there will be times when it is necessary to do so in order to avoid misleading or deceptive behaviour. Where it is likely that Alicer prior conduct has created a misleading impression, or where it is reasonable to do so, Alice should disclose further information to customer or another firm. The usage of the word 'free' by businesses should be avoided at all costs. The prospect of receiving goods or services for free might pique consumers' curiosity. Consumers expect 'free' to be fully free, which is a reasonable expectation. Simply put, firms may face legal ramifications if they fail to disclose the full truth about free offerings, including any criteria that the consumer must meet. For example, a company might say "10% free," implying that the price to the customer is the same but they get a larger "free" quantity of the goods. If the product's price has been raised, this may be deceiving because the extra volume is not genuinely free. Example: A company offers a "buy one, get one free" deal, but the first item's price is raised to nearly...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here