Is memory ability before a meal worse than after a meal? Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a...


Is memory ability before a meal worse than after a meal? Ten people were given memory tests before<br>their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better<br>memory ability.<br>Score on the Memory Test<br>Before<br>46 63 75 77 68 75 50 72 71 61<br>After<br>49 62 66 84 68 80 64 76 73 68<br>а Мeal<br>Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a =<br>0.05 level of significance?<br>For this study, we should use Select an answer<br>a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:<br>Ho: Select an answer v<br>Select an answer ♥<br>Select an answer<br>(please enter a decimal)<br>H: Select an answer v<br>Select an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal)<br>b. The test statistic ? v<br>(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)<br>c. The p-value =<br>(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)<br>d. The p-value is ? va<br>e. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.<br>f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...<br>O The results are statistically insignificant at a =<br>evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the<br>population mean memory score after a meal.<br>0.05, so there is statistically significant<br>The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude<br>that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are lower<br>on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal.<br>%3D<br>O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude<br>that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean<br>memory score after a meal<br>%3D<br>O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to<br>conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population<br>mean memory score after a meal.<br>g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.<br>O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean<br>

Extracted text: Is memory ability before a meal worse than after a meal? Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability. Score on the Memory Test Before 46 63 75 77 68 75 50 72 71 61 After 49 62 66 84 68 80 64 76 73 68 а Мeal Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.05 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer v Select an answer ♥ Select an answer (please enter a decimal) H: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ? v (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) c. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) d. The p-value is ? va e. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically insignificant at a = evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the population mean memory score after a meal. 0.05, so there is statistically significant The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are lower on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal. %3D O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score after a meal %3D O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score after a meal. g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean
g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.<br>O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean<br>memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after<br>a meal then there would be a 6.39% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people<br>who took the test before a meal would be at least 3.2 points lower than the mean memory<br>score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.<br>O If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the<br>same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and<br>if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a<br>6.39% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test<br>before a meal is at least 3.2 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who<br>took the test after a meal.<br>There is a 6.39% chance of a Type I error.<br>O There is a 6.39% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test<br>before a meal is at least 3.2 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who<br>took the test after a meal.<br>h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.<br>O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean<br>memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after<br>a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the<br>sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the<br>study differ from each other.<br>O There is a 5% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a<br>meal.<br>O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean<br>memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after<br>a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the<br>population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score<br>after a meal<br>There is a 5% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this<br>chapter is about.<br>

Extracted text: g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 6.39% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 3.2 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. O If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 6.39% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.2 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. There is a 6.39% chance of a Type I error. O There is a 6.39% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.2 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other. O There is a 5% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal. O If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score after a meal There is a 5% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this chapter is about.
Jun 02, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here