Introduction: This individual assignment will be assessed by means of a 3,500 ± 10% word report. The assignment has been designed to allow you to develop and use your knowledge and skills in understanding key strategic issues relating to the
Global Computer Technology Industry. You will be required to apply the strategic concepts and analytical techniques studied in this module. All the
learning outcomesbelow will be assessed:
Demonstrate critical understanding and application of relevant theories associated with global corporate policies and strategies.
Understand the holistic nature of strategy and apply analytical techniques to solve complex problems in real life organizations.
Demonstrate knowledge of the strategic decision making process through critical analysis of how strategic decision making enables an organisation to relate to its global business environment.
Critically evaluate and monitor the business mission, objectives and policies of international organisations.
Use critical reflective skills to reflect on the impact of their understanding on the problem solving process.
The assignment will be internally moderated by: John Dixon-Dawson Please note:
- All work must adhere to the University regulations on ‘Cheating, Collusion and Plagiarism’ which are provided as an Appendix in your Programme Handbook. You are encouraged to use
‘Harvard Referencing Style’
and avoid
‘Plagiarism’.
- A hard copy and an electronic copy on CD Rom or DVD of the assignment
must
be handed to the Library Services at St Peters Campus on or before the appointed date under cover of the Sunderland Business School (SBS) Feedback Sheet.
Please include a Turnitin Report.
Issue Date:
June 2012
Submission Date:
August 2012
Task Your task is to carry out a critical analysis and evaluation of the strategies adopted by
global computer hard and software suppliers,
using the information provided and other materials researched. You will be expected to select and apply appropriate theories, techniques and models studied during the module whilst having regard to the practical aspects of strategy development.
Your assignment should be presented in a business report format and should be within the range 3,500 ± 10% words (excluding executive summary/abstract, references and relevant appendices). The report should include a title page and abstract and be fully and consistently referenced, using Harvard Referencing style. You must also submit a CD Rom or DVD containing an electronic version of the report. This should be clearly labelled with your name, your course and the name of the case study.
It is recommended that you research information additional to the case study to support your arguments. This may be obtained from a diverse range of sources and you are encouraged to research the issues in whichever way you deem appropriate.
Assessment Criteria In the event of failing this individual assignment, normal referral / deferral procedures will apply. This assignment carries a weighting of 100%. The assessment will focus on the level of ANALYSIS carried out. That is, the application of THEORETICAL CONCEPTS studied in the module to the ‘practical’ case study presented. In other words, you should proceed beyond a DESCRIPTION of the company and its actions. You should be analysing ‘why’ rather then describing ‘what’. The assignment will be assessed and moderated by two members of staff in accordance with the marks allocated to each of the questions detailed below. 10% of the marks are set aside for the ‘presentation’ criteria.
Academic Rigour
- your ability to isolate the key strategic issues
- the coherence and depth of the analysis of those issues
- the ability to analyse the strategy context within which companies operates
- the ability to critically review and evaluate strategic decisions made by companies
Methodology
- the use of relevant evidence, from material provided and personal research to support any statements made
- the appropriateness of the methods used and theoretical models and frameworks applied
- the breadth and depth of research undertaken
Evaluation of data
- the ability to make sound recommendations or conclusions arising from the analysis
- the soundness of arguments put forward
Presentation
- the summary of arguments
- report layout and format
- use of illustrative material and evidence to support arguments
- the appropriateness of length
- the quantity and accuracy of referencing
The Global Computer Technology Industry:
|
“Stop and look at Apple for a second, since it’s an odd company…While most high-tech firms focus on one or two sectors, Apple does all of them at once…Apple is essentially operating its own closed miniature techno-economy…If you follow conventional wisdom, Apple is doing it all wrong. And yet…this is the company that gave us three of the signature technological innovations of the past 30 years: the Apple II, the Macintosh and the iPod.”
(Grossman, 2005; cited in De Wit and Meyer, 2010, p. 681)
Read the case study entitled
“Strategic leadership and innovation at Apple Inc.”
by Loizos Heracleous and Angeliki Papachroni, cited in De Wit and Meyer (2010:681-692)
Strategy Process, Content, Context;and carry out appropriate analyses of the global corporate strategies adopted by Apple Inc. and other world-class computer technology suppliers such as Microsoft and Dell, and answer the questions below.
You are encouraged to use relevant data/information from company websites.Using relevant information from the case study, the literature and company websites, compare and contrast the
‘core competences and dynamic capabilities’
as they relate to the following Value Chain activities of Apple Inc. (www.apple.com), and Dell (www.dell.co.uk) from 2006 to 2012.
Inbound logistics and Procurement (10 marks)
Operations, Marketing and Sales (10 marks)
Human Resource and Customer Services (10 marks)
Note:A critical application of Porter’s Value Chain model is required.
[
30 % marks]Compare and contrast the meaning of the terms
‘strategic alliance (SAs)’and ‘
mergers and acquisitions (M&As)’in the context of network level corporate strategy development in the global consumer electronics and entertainment industry, and critically evaluate the success or failure of SAs and M&As in Apple Inc. from 2006 to 2012.
You are expected to use relevant information from the Apple case study and from Apple’s recent Annual Reports available online (www.apple.com).
[30 % marks]Using the information given in the Apple Inc. case study and your own understanding of
‘strategic leadership’and ‘innovation
’, critically evaluate the impact of top-down and bottom-up approaches to leadership in helping Apple achieve
‘breakthrough innovation”
in the global consumer electronics and entertainment’ industry.
[30 % marks]Note:
10%marks is allocated for overall presentation
Suggested Reading:De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2010) -
Strategy Process, Content, and ContextInternational Perspective, 4th Edition, Thomson Learning
De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004) -
Strategy Process, Content, and ContextInternational Perspective, 3rd Edition, Thomson Learning
Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2005)
Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases,7
thEdition, Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Lynch, R. (2006)
Corporate Strategy,Fourth Edition, Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (1998)
Strategy Safari, Financial Times Prentice Hall
Websites & PDF documents:www.apple.com/ Apple Inc.
www.ibm.com IBM
www.dell.co.uk Dell
www.economist.com The Economist
www.ft.com The Financial Times