Introduction: This individual assignment will be assessed by means of a 3,000 word report. The assignment has been designed to allow you to develop and use your knowledge and skills in understanding...

1 answer below »
















Introduction: This individual assignment will be assessed by means of a 3,000 word report. The assignment has been designed to allow you to develop and use your knowledge and skills in understanding key strategic issues relating to strategic renewal in a global industry. You will be required to apply the strategic concepts and analytical techniques studied in this module. All the
learning outcomes
below will be assessed:


  1. Ability to analyse the complexity of organisations and their environments


  2. Demonstrate an understandingof the complexity of the relationships between an organisation and its environment


  3. Ability to evaluate existing models against practices of real organisations


The assignment will be marked and moderated by: Module Tutors Please note:

  1. All work must adhere to the University regulations on ‘Cheating, Collusion and Plagiarism’ which are provided as an Appendix in your Programme handbook.
    See your Tutor for guidance on ‘Harvard Referencing Style’, and avoiding‘Plagiarism’.

  2. A hard copy, an electronic copy on CD or DVD Rom, of the assignment
    must
    be handed into your Local Study Centre on or before the appointed date under cover of the Sunderland Business School Feedback Sheet.


  3. Submission Date:Monday 7th
    January 2013


Task Your task is to carry out a critical analysis and evaluation of strategy development in a well established international manufacturer of heavy construction equipment, using the information provided and other materials researched. You will be expected to select and apply appropriate theories, techniques and models studied during the module whilst having regard to the practical aspects of strategic renewal.
Your assignment should be presented in a business report format and should be within the range 3,000 +/- 500 words (excluding executive summary, references and relevant appendices). The report should include a title page and executive summary and be fully and consistently referenced, using the Harvard Referencing style. You must also submit a CD or DVD Rom containing an electronic version of the report. This should be clearly labelled with your name, your course and the name of the case study.
It is recommended that you research information additional to the case study to support your arguments. This may be obtained from a diverse range of sources and you are encouraged to research the issues in whichever way you deem appropriate. Assessment Criteria In the event of failing this individual assignment, normal referral / deferral procedures will apply. This assignment carries a weighting of 100%. The assessment will focus on the level of ANALYSIS carried out. That is, the application of THEORETICAL CONCEPTS studied in the module to the ‘practical’ case study presented. In other words, you should proceed beyond a DESCRIPTION of the company and its actions. You should be analysing ‘why’ rather than describing ‘what’. The assignment will be assessed and moderated by the module team in accordance with the marks allocated to each of the questions detailed below. 10% of the marks are set aside for the ‘report style’ criteria.

Academic Rigour

  • your ability to isolate the key strategic issues

  • the coherence and depth of the analysis of those issues

  • the ability to analyse the strategy context within which companies operate

  • the ability to critically review and evaluate strategic decisions made by companies




Methodology

  • the use of relevant evidence, from material provided and personal research to support any statements made

  • the appropriateness of the methods used and theoretical models and frameworks applied

  • the breadth and depth of research undertaken




Evaluation of data

  • the ability to make sound recommendations or conclusions arising from the analysis

  • the soundness of arguments put forward




Format of Report

  • the summary of arguments

  • report layout and format

  • use of illustrative material and evidence to support arguments

  • the appropriateness of length

  • the quantity and accuracy of referencing




The Comeback of Caterpillar, 1985-2001

Caterpillar, established in the early 1900s, was one of the most successful international manufacturers of heavy construction equipment, frequently outperforming its competitors in relation to quality, profitability and market share. By 1982, the company appeared to have lost its golden touch. The combined impact of an overvalued dollar, the collapse of its major markets, a costly labour strike and the sudden emergence of a key competitor – Komatsu, resulted in Caterpillar being in an unfamiliar and unnerving environment. How could the company renew itself to return to its former success.
Instructions:

  • ANSWERALL THREE QUESTIONS



  • You are expected to use the information in the case study ‘The Comeback of Caterpillar (1985-2001’ by Cohen, I. cited in De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004) Strategy: Process, Content, Context. An International Perspective: Thomson Learning, London, Third Edition, pp. 755-772, and your own understanding of the process of strategy, strategy content and strategy context and your own additional research information.

  • Your answer should be based on critical ‘internal’ and ‘external’ environmental analyses using appropriate analytical techniques.




Question One:



  1. What were the major internal and external factors forcing Caterpillar to renew its strategy in the period 1985-2001? (20 marks)

  2. Highlight the measures the company took to solve its problems during this time period.


(10 marks)


Question Two:



  1. Which major sources of resistance against change can be identified at Caterpillar during the reign of CEO’s Schaefer and Fites?
    (20 marks)

  2. What would you expect to be the major sources of resistance faced by CEO Barton?
    (10 marks)




Question Three:

  1. What were the major revolutionary changes that shaped Caterpillar’s business system and organisational system between 1985-2001? Which evolutionary changes took place during the same period of time?
    (20 marks)

  2. What seems to be the dominant perspective at Caterpillar in respect of strategic change?



(10 marks)


Note:
10%
of marks are allocated to report style.

Suggested Reading:


Textbooks:

De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004) –Strategy Process, Content, and Context: AnInternational Perspective, 3rd Edition, Thomson Learning
Hofstede, G. (1993) ‘Cultural constraints in management theories’, in De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004)Strategy Process, Content, Context,
3rd Edition, Thomson, London; cited inSIM336 Module Workbook, 2011, Unit 7, page 203).

Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2005)
Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases,
7th
Edition, Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
Lynch, R. (2006)
Corporate Strategy,
Fourth Edition, Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (1998)
Strategy Safari, Financial Times, Prentice Hall
Whittington, R. (2000)
What is Strategy and does it matter?
Thompson Learning.

Websites &PDF documents:


www.cat.com

www.economist.com The Economist
www.ft.com The Financial Times

Source; John Dixon-Dawson


October 2012


Answered Same DayDec 21, 2021

Answer To: Introduction: This individual assignment will be assessed by means of a 3,000 word report. The...

David answered on Dec 21 2021
120 Votes
Case
Case study
Strategic Management
Case
Introduction and background
The given case focuses on the various changes that Caterpillar went through and its
change strategy. As there is higher levels of competition that have set in, it becomes essential for
Caterpillar to be able to create higher levels of competency and competitiveness. Outsourcing,
restructuring, better levels of leadership and employee involvement are some of the major steps
taken by Caterpillar in order to sustain its position as a market player in the construction
equipment business (Cohen, I
. cited in De Wit, B. and Meyer, R., 2004).
The major internal and external factors forcing Caterpillar to renew its strategy in the
period 1985-2001
The major internal and external factors forcing Caterpillar to renew its strategy include
competition (Cohen, I. cited in De Wit, B. and Meyer, R., 2004). As competition is high in this
industry in the global domain, the fact that Caterpilar had to face maximum competition from
foreign firms was one of the major external factors that led to change and adoption of strategies
like outsourcing. As the global environment was growing in terms of outsourcing and this was
become a trend as a strategy that could help firms reduce their costs and overheads, thus leading
to better efficiency, Caterpillar also had to adopt this in order to remain competitive. As the
external environment was becoming competitive even in terms of cost and value and customers
expected higher levels of value for money, Caterpillar had to revise its strategy in order to suit
the external environment. In case of the international environment, in this period, there happened
to be several changes as players from Japan and other developing countries, with several cost
advantages came into operations in the global markets. The business strategy has now been
narrowed down based on outsourcing in order to increase the profitability of the business. This
has been achieved through reorganization.
Moreover the internal environment was such that change became essential. As the
internal environment was not strong enough to implement adaptation, change became essential.
Standardization, in case of international or multi-national businesses, broadly refers to the
process of using the same strategies throughout the business operations in all of the markets.
Adaptation, on the other hand, refers to the strategy of fine tuning the brand methods of a
business and customizing them to suit each of the markets. In this way adaptation and
standardization form two broad business strategies that have to be pondered upon and chosen by
the management of a firm based upon the nature of the industry, the needs of the market and the
nature of the goods and services being offered. As Caterpillar required to become an
international and global player, such capabilities and magnitude in terms of business became
essential. So, there had to be revamping of several of the strategies, processes and procedures in
Caterpillar so that the firm could suit the market and be able to compete globally.
The goal of outsourcing in this case is that it helps ensure appropriate levels of
performance and efficiency in the organization. The performance measures depend on the
organization as a whole, and not on the specific operating unit. In case of dealing with external
and internal market environments, restructuring, involving employees and several such measures
Case
become crucial in order to make change effective and substantial as well as implement it with
minimum resistance from employees.
The measures the company took to solve its problems during this time period
The company took several measures to solve its problems during this period.
Outsourcing, restructuring, employee involvement and improving leadership in the firm are some
of the steps that firms going global and dealing with global competition are essential (De Wit, B.
and Meyer, R, 2004). As Caterpillar also faced the same issues and required to take up these
measures it combined all of it into a change strategy. This helped Caterpillar implement these
changes effectively and reducing resistance from employees to minimum based on employee
involvement.
Change Management is defined as a combination of various processes which are
employed to facilitate implementation of important changes in an orderly controlled and
symmetric way to bring in a larger change in an organization and this makes it extremely
important for present day organizations to understand the concepts and fundamentals of change
management in order to appropriately implement change in the organization. Organizational
change is not an easy exercise and managements encounter number of issues or problems for
facilitating smooth changeover but an understanding about the organizational change can help
gain several insights and also create effective change management strategies which is appropriate
since the nature of change is understood and the strategy formulated is in synch or aligned to the
type and nature of change. It becomes essential to involve employees and achieve better levels of
leadership which were rightly done by the firm.
The major sources of resistance against change can be identified at Caterpillar during the
reign of CEO’s Schaefer and Fites
The major sources of resistance against change can be identified at Caterpillar during the
reign of CEO’s Schaefer and Fites based on employee insecurities and difficulties in
implementation of change. Psychological difficulties were high. There were adaptation and
training issues. All of these had to be resolved through effective leadership and involvement of
employees in the change process...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here