Introduction In assessment two, you analysed the performance of the health system for a country of your choice from the provided recommendations on various parts of the health system that need to be...

1 answer below »

IntroductionIn assessment two, you analysed the performance of the health system for a country of your choice from the provided recommendations on various parts of the health system that need to be improved. In response and with greater interest, the Minister of Health has asked you to provide a detailed analysis of how your recommendations will strengthen the health system performance and sustain the health outcomes. This is in light of the concerns that further reforms will be costly, unsustainable and even weaken the resilience of the health system given the other changes being implemented in response to the challenges the health system is currently facing i.e. emerging pandemics/epidemics and increasing non-communicable diseases, growing ageing population, rapid changing technology and sky-rocketing of healthcare costs.For purposes of assessment 3, choose one recommendation from the three which you suggested to the government in assessment 2 and frame it as an intervention or policy action or strategy or innovation that the government needs to implement. Position the intervention/strategy/policy action/innovation within the appropriate/related health system building block i.e. health service delivery, human resource, financing, pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, governance and leadership. Write a report to the Minister of Health, detailing how your proposed intervention will strengthen the overall health system performance, resilience and sustainability.The assessment task;

  1. Analyse the extent of the problem being addressed and intervention which you are proposing. For example;

    • Examine the complexity of the problem which your proposed intervention is addressing i.e. how big is the problem, what are its causes and/ or contributing factors, how does it affect the health system performance and health outcomes, and the challenges it pauses to its (Health System) resilience and sustainability.



  2. Describe the related reforms that the government is implementing, identify existing limitations and discuss how your proposed intervention will complement the on-going health system reforms.

  3. Describe the intervention which you are proposing and demonstrate how it will effectively address the identified problem. Use evidence from other countries to support your arguments in favour of your proposition.

  4. Bearing in mind that the success of changes in one health system building block are dependent on how well the others building blocks function, discuss what is required for the change to implemented i.e. resources, policies, regulations, information, medical supplies …... Then discuss the changes that need to happen in the other building blocks of the health system for the intervention to be implemented successfully. For example;

    • Changes in leadership and governance i.e. roles the relevant actors or stakeholders, policies, rules, regulations, standard operating procedures, organizational structures.

    • Changes in financing - sources and mechanisms

    • Changes in the healthcare services and delivery system – quality, safety, affordability, accessibility, availability

    • Changes in human resource – quantity, availability, quality, competence and regulations

    • Changes in pharmaceuticals and medical supplies-this could relate to quantity, procurement process, costing, regulation etc

    • Changes in health information- new indicators, and how data will be collected

    • How will the healthcare services and the delivery system improve?



  5. Again, bearing in mind that the changes/reforms in one building block affect the overall health system, discuss how the proposed intervention will strengthen the health system’s overall performance, resilience, and sustainability. You will need to map the improvements in the performance of the health system (intermediary outcomes) and the ultimate health outcomes because of the intervention which you are proposing. This requires some imagination of what you think could be possibly achieved if your new idea gets adopted and implemented using the existing evidence.

  6. Discuss how strong, resilient and sustainable the health system of your selected country will look like after the new intervention is successfully implemented.


Outline for your report


  1. Background:provide a brief description of the health system of your selected country and the extent of the problem or challenge which one of your recommendation addressed in your initial analysis from assessment 2. Demonstrate how the problem is affecting the health system performance and pausing a challenge to its resilience and sustainability.


  2. Acknowledge the on-going health sector system reforms:Describe the on-going reforms that the government is already implementing, complement the government on its efforts to strengthen the health system and identify existing limitations and discuss how your proposed intervention will complement these on-going health system reforms.


  3. The intervention being proposed
    :Describe the intervention which you are proposing and demonstrate how it will effectively address the identified problem. Use evidence from other countries to support your arguments.


  4. Overall health system changes that need to happen to support the new intervention: identify the changes that need to happen in the other building blocks of the health system for the proposed intervention/innovation to be implemented successfully.


  5. The value of your proposed innovation:discuss how your proposition will strengthen the health system performance, resilience, and sustainability with reference to the challenges that the health system is facing as described in the background. You will need to map the anticipated intermediary and long-term outcomes associated with your proposed intervention which should include resilience and sustainability.


  6. Conclusion:provide a concise and robust synthesis of your analysis demonstrating how a well performing, resilient and sustainable health system will look like if that your proposition gets implemented. This should be the key message which you are emphasising to the government in response to the Minister of Health’s concerns about further health system reforms. You will be required to address the question, “how strong, resilient and sustainable will the health system of your selected country look like if the new intervention gets implemented and what you anticipate would happen your position does not get to be implemented.

Answered 1 days AfterJun 02, 2022

Answer To: Introduction In assessment two, you analysed the performance of the health system for a country of...

Dr. Saloni answered on Jun 03 2022
96 Votes
1
Healthcare Access: Māori
Contents
Background    1
On-going Health Sector System Reforms    2
Proposed Intervention    3
Changes for Support    5
Value of Proposed Intervention    6
Conclusion    7
References    7
Background
New Zealand's healthcare system is among the strongest on the planet, with most of the population accessing affordable and safe treatment. It is collaboratively governed by every level of administration in the nation. The public hospital and medicare system provide low-cost or free access to the majority of such medical services for every resident. New Zealand has attained universal medical coverage through a distribution system that is primarily publicly financed and locally controlled. Inpatient, mental health, long-term care, and outpatient service
s, and also prescription medicines, are all covered (Came et al., 2019). The majority of services are funded through general taxes. The benefits package and annual budget are determined by the national government. District health committees are responsible for local health care planning, delivery, and purchasing. Patients can pay copayments for some treatments and items but have no deductibles. One-third of the populace has private insurance that will cover non-covered treatments and copayments (Gillon & Pausé, 2021).
Moreover, Māori individuals have been economically, socially, and politically marginalised, resulting in lower life expectancy, lower income, inferior health and education results, and stigmatisation in medical services, among other repercussions. Māori patients frequently describe poor hospital experiences and unequal access to therapies and levels of care. Similarly, Māori families seeking hospital services for their children face societal impediments (Harrison et al., 2019). It indicated that racism, both systematic and individual, and stereotyping in the healthcare system were likely causes of discrepancies and poor access to medical services. The tribunal determined that if Māori were addressed similarly to non-Māori in health, there must be no variation in health interventions or outcomes. Unequal Māori healthcare consequences are associated with wider Indigenous colonial concerns like language degradation, land theft, discrimination, social marginalisation, and racist policies. Reduced access to socioeconomic health determinants, greater rates of preventive and unfavourable in-hospital occurrences, and a higher probability of inadequate follow-up and care are all practises related to colonisation (Hikaka et al., 2021).
This paper focuses on the intervention for Māori (indigenous) people of New Zealand, relevant ongoing health sector system reforms, proposed interventions, things that are required to be implemented, the value of proposed interventions, and the level of strength, resilience, and sustainability of the healthcare system after implementing change.

On-going Health Sector System Reforms
As the government's health and disability advisor, the Ministry is critical in determining the course for Māori health and directing the market as humans seek to enhance access, promote equity, and strengthen Māori performance. As a component of the epidemic immunisation programme and vaccine nationwide rollout, financing is available to aid organisations in providing tailored local and regional Māori support and communication measures for Māori (Hikaka et al., 2021). The Health ministry is undertaking reforms to enhance performance in several areas, such as: enhancing Māori outcomes and attaining health equality; a strong emphasis on equality and evidence-based actions; and integrating Māori health improvement throughout the organisation. One of the catalysts for this adjustment was to strengthen the Ministry's overall competency and capability to confront Māori health disparities. Māori Leadership is a novel executive position charged with advancing the Ministry's aim of enhancing Māori healthcare outcomes and attaining Māori equity in health within the Department. Te Kete Hauora continues to provide policy advice, study, and programme services (Kidd et al., 2018).
The He Korowai Oranga, New Zealand's Māori Healthcare Initiative, establishes the overall framework that leads the Administration and the disability and health sectors to achieve the optimal quality of care for Māori. The health ministry is collaborating with the broader social and health sectors to create a Māori Healthcare Action Plan that will allow for a more determined and collaborative approach to achieving He Korowai Oranga. This Action Plan is expected to be a vital element in encouraging collaboration to eliminate healthcare access disparities while providing effective and high-quality services that meet Māori's goals for healthcare and well-being (Harrison et al., 2019).
Initiatives aimed at improving Māori people's health include the development of Māori medical practitioners, community-led initiatives, and an emphasis on health literacy. Māori bears the burden of under-provision and underfunding of basic health care, which is measured in illness, suffering, and mortality. The monetary equivalent price of Māori's bad health and fatalities over an 18-year timeframe that may be attributed to failing policy execution is more than 5 billion dollars each year. The cost of finance for a given sample of four Māori basic health organisations reveals that the funding model impoverished those entities by between 346 million and 412 million dollars over an 18-year timeframe (Came et al., 2019). Furthermore, care facilities are more typically located in cities, making travel difficult for several Māori, and the internet scheduling system presents a stumbling barrier for areas lacking internet connectivity. The tribunal also determined that the decision to change to a new COVID-19 response structure did not appropriately reflect Māori's health requirements and that there had been a dearth of consistent consultation with Māori on critical issues. When the delta version first showed up, it dispersed through urban disadvantaged areas, disproportionately affecting people who have a history of drug and alcohol dependency, mental health issues, long-term economic hardship, and overpopulated and transitory living environments where Pasifika and Māori are overrepresented (Gillon & Pausé, 2021). As it moves towards repression, the government has hurried to increase immunisation in Pasifika and Māori. This included deploying mobile immunisation buses to provide vaccines to low-uptake populations that have difficulty accessing major clinics, as well as increasing interaction with Māori leadership to accelerate vaccine deployment in local areas with more government financing (Haitana et al., 2020). The tribunal advises more financing, resources, data, and other assistance for Māori communities and providers, as well as more involvement and requests to "expressly target Māori" in adolescent vaccination and booster implementation. Furthermore, Māori families seeking medical care for their children face societal impediments. Health research methodologies are dominated by reductionist and biomedical paradigms that emphasise clinical presentation, and the perspectives of marginalised populations are submerged into dominant individualism and colonialist narratives. In essence, Māori's medical necessities remain unmet. Interventions to enhance the access of Māori to healthcare include employing Māori people to provide non-Indigenous healthcare and services and training non-Indigenous workers in cultural competency (Kidd et al., 2018).

Proposed Intervention
Indigenous primary healthcare centre workers and leaders can assist in integrating the cultural differences in...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here