Interpret the results. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Missouri is less than 26%. O At the 10% level of...

Extracted text: Interpret the results. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Missouri is less than 26%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Missouri is more than 26%. At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Missouri is more than 26%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Missouri is not equal to 26%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Missouri is not equal to 26%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Missouri is less than 26%.


Extracted text: According to a report on consumer fraud and identity theft, 26% of all complaints for a year were for identity theft. In that year, Missouri had 938 complaints of identity theft out of 3400 consumer complaints. Does this data provide enough evidence to show that Missouri had a different proportion of identity theft than 26%? Test at the 10% level. State the hypotheses. Ho: p? v Ha: p? v Calculate the test statistic. Round to four decimal places. Calculate the standardized test statistic. Round to three decimal places. Z = Find the p-value. Round to four decimal places. p-value State your decision. O Since the p-value is less than .10, fail to reject Ho. O Since the p-value is greater than .10, fail to reject Ho. O Since the p-value is greater than .10, reject Ho. O Since the p-value is less than .10, reject Họ.