Instructions
Your task is to write a 2,000-word Project Charter style report on the case study below. An appropriate report structure must be used along with correct APA style referencing.
Case Study
Riverina Agriculture and Lifestyle Show Background
Prior to the establishment of Globex, founding business B T & Sons Farming Equipment established the annual Riverina Agriculture and Lifestyle Show (RALS) in the year 2000. The RALS is a 3-day event held in November each year and showcases farmers, local business, agricultural equipment suppliers and lifestyle products. The management of the RALS requires the coordination of show stands, demonstrations, live displays, catering, and volunteers, and was originally undertaken by B T & Sons.
The RALS has grown significantly since its inception and is now managed by a community committee. Globex however is still committed to the RALS and has strong community engagement through the management and coordination of the volunteers required for the RALS to run smoothly.
All takings from the show gates are donated to charity Indigenous Community Volunteers (ICV), who are very active in the Riverina Region. ICV are invited by communities to help them achieve their own goals through their national network of skilled volunteers, who provide practical hands-on help where skills and resources are limited. The ICV also provides volunteers to assist with the RALS, giving back to the community they are working in.
In order to maximise gate takings and therefore donations to ICV, the RALS is heavily dependent on ticket sales.
Currently, tickets can only be purchased at the RALS gates, which causes significant delays, especially on opening day. It is also suspected that when crowds are large and the ticket
sales process is slow, people are slipping through the gates without paying to avoid a lengthy wait. The gates are currently manned by volunteers who simply observe that each person entering is carrying a valid ticket. When crowd numbers are large or during peak periods, it is difficult for volunteers to check all tickets.
To improve this process and maximise ticket sales, the RALS committee have made the decision to outsource the development of a ticketing system. As founders of the RALS and trusted committee members Globex has been asked to take the lead role in sourcing a suitable business to develop the ticketing system. As such, based on their long-standing relationship, Globex has contracted Virtucon to develop the requiresd system.
Project Description
The RALS committee have requested a computer-based ticketing system to replace their current manual system.
Currently tickets can only be purchased at the RALS gates which causes significant delays, especially on opening day. It is also suspected that when crowds are large and the ticket sales process is slow, people are slipping through the gates without paying to avoid a lengthy wait.
To improve this the RALS committee have recommended an online ticketing system be implemented. The system should enable patrons to access ticket sale from any online platform and mobile device so that tickets can be purchased before the event. Tickets need to be digitally enabled and can be scanned at the gate so that a range of reports can be generated by the system. As well as digital sales, tickets should also be available for purchase from a number of locations in the town and at the gates for those who do not have access to a computer or suitable device. It is expected however that the ability to purchase tickets prior to the event will significantly reduce the queues at the gates and ticket evasion.
The RALS committee have indicated that a number of ticket options should be made available
Single day passes
2 & 3 day passes
Family passes (2 adults and max 3 kids under 16)
Kids passes (under 16)
Student passes (valid with student id for over 16s)
Concession passes (valid with a pension card)
Stall holders pass (3 free passes per stall. If more are required they are charged at
the concession rate).
The RALS committee have also requested that:
A cost estimate and budget be prepared for the cost of the system development and
implementation
Barcodes or QR codes are used on tickets and that turnstiles with barcode readers be installed (to capture data, reduce number of volunteers and reduce ticket evasion)
Tickets may be printed as well as e-tickets generated
Detailed reporting system to include (but not limited to):
osales of tickets & breakdown of ticket type
ohow many bought tickets vs how many were redeemed
ohow many people came through the gates each day / peak timesowhere tickets were purchased (online / outlet / gate).
Write a report (2000 words) and cover the following areas:
Overview: Short summary of the objectives and scope of the project
Identify the MOV and explain how it was developed
Stakeholder analysis and communication plan
Project Risk Analysis and Plan including any assumptions you have made about the
project, identification of at least five risks to the project, analysis of these risks i.e. assign a risk to an appropriate member, and describe a strategy for the management of each specific risk.
A WBS (prepared using MS Project or Project Libre) for the project including: milestones, tasks to be performed, duration, responsible team member
Discussion of the leadership qualities required by the project manager and the roles and responsibilities of the project team members.
Your answers to these questions must be justified and supported. All assumptions must be clearly stated.
All material sourced and used in answering these questions must be fully referenced in accordance with Faculty guidelines.
You must also submit your MS Project or Project Libre file
Rationale
This assessment has been designed to allow you to show your ability to:
be able to identify and reflect on the key elements of the PMBOK (Project Management Body of Knowledge) framework, including project stakeholders, communication management, the project management knowledge areas, common tools and techniques, and project success factors.
be able to critically evaluate how a practising ICT project manager applies ICT project management techniques, skills, methods and software tools in the IT profession.
be able to apply and analyse established ICT project management principles, skills and techniques to a case study.
Requirements
All referencing in the project material must be in accordance with the APA style guide. A guide to the APA style of referencing (the style now used by the Faculty of Business) is available at: http://www.csu.edu.au/division/studserv/learning/pdfs/apa.pdf
Marking criteria
CRITERIA STANDARDS
|
HD DI (100%–85%) (84%–75%)
|
CR (74%–65%)
|
PS (64%–50%)
|
FL (49%–0)
|
Clear overview, and logical report structure (10 marks)
All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated
All topics are pertinent but not covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated
|
Few topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated
|
Generally relevant and analyzed
|
Identified issues are not relevant to the assessment topic
|
MOV is appropriate to the project and well explained. (10 marks)
MOV is detailed, well written and contains suitable metrics. Supported by a detailed discussion of how the MOV was derived.
MOV is detailed, and contains suitable metrics. Supported by a clear discussion of how the MOV was derived.
|
MOV is related to the project and contains some metrics. There are some appropriate reasons given to support the MOV.
|
MOV is relevant to the project but may not be detailed or not have clear metrics. There are some statements to support the MOV.
|
MOV does not match the project and the discussion does not provide further explanation.
|
Having well focusedkey stakeholder roles and responsibilities. Demonstrating Project Management knowledge
(10 marks)
More than five stakeholdersare identified and their roles & responsibilities are explicitly defined and discussed in relation to the scenario including a detailed and well supported discussion of the leadership qualities required by the Project Manager
Five stakeholdersare identified and their roles & responsibilities are explicitly defined and discussed in relation to the scenario. Project Manager qualities are discussed with some links to PM theory.
|
At least four stakeholders are identified and their roles & responsibilities are explicitly defined and discussed in relation to the scenario. Project Manager qualities are discussed with some links to PM theory.
|
At least three stakeholders are identified and their roles & responsibilities are explicitly defined and discussed in relation to the scenario. Project Manager qualities are discussed to some extent.
|
Less than three stakeholders are identified and their roles & responsibilities are explicitly defined and discussed in relation to the scenario. Project Manager qualities are not discussed.
|
Report structure based on project management methods such as WBS & Risk analysis
(10 marks)
The recommended report structure logically follows from the data gathered. Analytical considerations are in-depth,
The recommended report structure logically follow from the data gathered. Analytical considerations are organized
|
The recommended report structure logically follows from the data gathered. Analytical considerations are organized
|
The recommended report structure follow from the data gathered. Analytical considerations state a general conclusion that provides a broad
|
The recommended report structure does not follow from the data gathered. There is no clear analytical considerations discussed or presented
|
CRITERIA
|
STANDARDS
|
|
organized evidence that reveal insightful patterns, differences or similarities of systems
|
evidence that reveal important patterns, differences or similarities of systems
|
evidence that provide insight into possible patterns within systems
|
application of the recommendation that may or may not be useful
|
|
Quality of writing, clarity & conciseness & overall presentation
(5 marks)
|
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar and spelling accurate
|
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar and spelling accurate
|
Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar and spelling accurate
|
Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors
|
Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response.
Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well- organised,
Grammar and spelling contain errors
|
Referencing, formatting and style (5 marks)
|
Referencing is consistently accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text
|
Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text
|
Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text
|
Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text
|
Referencing is absent/unsystematic
|