INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW
FACULTY OF LIFELONG LEARNING
ASSIGNMENT
Higher Diploma in Applied Social Studies CW_HXASS_H
Module Title
|
Creative Skills 2
|
Assignment Number
|
1
|
Assignment Type
|
Creative intervention and poster
|
Weighting
|
100%
|
Submission date
|
Suggested submission 6th December 2021
|
Module: Creative Skills 2
|
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this module the learner should be able to:
LO1 Document the planning and implementation of creative interventions.
LO2 Evaluate creative activities in social care practice.
LO3 Understand and analyse creative processes at individual and group level.
LO4 Identify how creative activities can be applied in a variety of settings.
LO5 Experience producing creative work within a health/social care context.
Assignment:
This assignment consists of parts. Please ensure that each part is submitted to the relevant portals in Turn it in
Part 1 80%:
Design an intervention for a client group of your choice. The intervention should utilise two creative arts forms to meet identified needs of that group
The plan should be typed under the following headings.
Section A: Pre-Planning Stages
Section B: The Intervention
Section C: The Evaluation
Section D: Modification
Section E: Reflection
Section A: Pre-Planning:
Consideration of the group profile, group needs and orientation, possible challenges
Observations and questions that are important to consider in running of a session for the particular target group/individual
Additional factors you considered in your pre-session planning (400 words)
Section B: Intervention
Workshop description: (A brief Summary i.e. group, location, etc.)
Objectives: (Clear understanding of overall objectives and rationale for the group)
Agenda and Activities: Include a detailed step by step description of the intervention which includes two creative art forms. Theoretical justification must be provided as to why this approach will meet the needs of the group
(1150 words)
Section C: Evaluation
Identify how intervention will be evaluated
How did the group/individual respond
Were there goals and objectives met or could you identify new goals or what were the challenges or emerging issues during the sessions (450 Words)
Section D: Modification
In this section you need to consider and justify using literature how you would modify the intervention to accommodateone of the following scenarios:
a) Intervention needs to go online due to covid restrictions.
b) Intervention is to be offered to a group of people with either physical or intellectual disability (if original group is not intended for people with physical or intellectual disability)
c) Original budget for intervention has been reduced. (500 words)
Section E: Reflection
Offer a reflection on what you learnt from planning an intervention and consider how it will help improve your professional practice (500 words)
Total Word Count: 3,000
Part 2: Poster Presentation (20%)
Design a poster that explains the intervention detailed in section above.
This poster can be made using word/powerpoint/publisher or Canva/ pic monkey (free apps to design posters etc) and saved as a pdf for presentation in class on the last night.
Presentation should be approx. 5 minutes long
Rubric for Part 1: Intervention(80%)
Fail
|
Pass
|
2.2
|
2.1
|
1.1
|
Preplanning:
1 Groups needs/Consideration of the possible challenges
2,Observations and questions that are important to the running of a session for the particular target group/individual
3.Factors you considered in your pre-session planning(20%)
|
No consideration of possible challenges or factors considered
|
Poor consideration of possible challenges and factors
|
Adequate consideration of possible challenges
And Factors
|
Good consideration of possible challenges
And factors
|
Excellent consideration of possible challenges and factors
|
Workshop
a.brief Summary
b.Objectives: (Clear understanding of overall objectives)
c.Agenda and Activities: Include a detailed step by step description of the intervention which includes two creative art forms. Theoretical justification must be provided as to why this approach will meet the needs of the group(40%)
|
Unclear objectives and no chosen creative arts activities
|
Clear objectives poor use of creative arts activities
|
Clear objectives good use of creative art activities but no theoretical underpinning
|
Good summary clear objectives two effective creative arts activities chosen but with limited theoretical underpinning
|
Excellent summary very clear objectives two effective creative arts activities chosen with theoretical underpinning
|
Evaluation (10%)
|
evaluation not considered
|
Poor consideration of evaluation
|
Adequate consideration of evaluation
|
Good consideration of evaluation
|
Excellent consideration of evaluation
|
Modification (10%)
|
Modification not considered
|
Poor modification with no literature referred to
|
Adequate modification with some literature
|
Good modification and evidence with literature
|
Excellent modification and evidenced with literature
|
Reflection (10%)
|
Reflection not considered
|
Average level of reflection considered
|
Good reflection
|
Very good reflection
|
In-depth reflection and linked to practice
|
Structure/flow (10%)
|
A random and undisciplined development of argument, layout or presentation. Solutions offered to a very limited portion of the problem set. An answer unacceptably incomplete.
|
Several minor errors or one or more major error.
|
Clear expression with few areas of confusion. Writing of sufficient quality to convey meaning but some lack of fluency and command of suitable vocabulary.
|
Clear and fluent expression.
|
Clear, fluent, stimulating and original expression.
|
Rubric Part 2: Poster Presentation (20%)
Fail
|
Pass
|
2.2
|
2.1
|
1.1
|
Visual (40%)
|
Visually incoherent
|
Crowded poster difficult to decipher information
|
Good layout but lacked creativity limited use of images
|
Creative poster good use of images
|
Very Creative & imaginative poster Clear images, interesting, use of colour
|
Verbal skills (20%)
|
Poor connection with audience and reading notes
|
Read the presentation with limited connection with audience
|
Limited engagement with audience and/or reading from notes
|
Engaging tone & connected with audience
|
Very clear and coherent delivery
Responded to audience and demonstrated deep knowledge
|
Timing (20%)
|
Presentation within 40+% of allocated time
|
Presentation within 30% of allocated time
|
Presentation within 20% of allocated time
|
Presentation within 15% of allocated time
|
Presentation within 10% of allocated time
|
Sequence/flow
(20%)
|
Disorganised
|
Poorly structured
|
Clear, structured
|
Logical links in content
|
Coherent
Content current significant and relevant to topic
|