Increase K1 to shift the N1-intercept out for the pathogen O No further engineering is needed because there is a steady state point Decrease 12 to shift the N2-intercept up for the pathogen Increase...


Increase K1 to shift the N1-intercept out for the pathogen<br>O No further engineering is needed because there is a steady state point<br>Decrease 12<br>to shift the N2-intercept up for the pathogen<br>Increase K2 to shift the N2-intercept up for the probiotic<br>

Extracted text: Increase K1 to shift the N1-intercept out for the pathogen O No further engineering is needed because there is a steady state point Decrease 12 to shift the N2-intercept up for the pathogen Increase K2 to shift the N2-intercept up for the probiotic
For a pathogen of interest there is a potential probiotic (the adjacent phase plane<br>diagram depicts the interaction of these two species: orange = pathogen; blue =<br>probiotic). Currently the carrying capacities are K1 = 550, K2 = 700; and the<br>competition coefficients are ¤12 = 0.6, a21 = 0.9 (1 = pathogen, 2 = probiotic).<br>Which of the following would be a good strategy to make the probiotic more<br>effective at eliminating the pathogen?<br>%3D<br>%3D<br>1000<br>800-<br>600-<br>400<br>200-<br>0<br>200 400 600<br>800 1000<br>Species 1 (#)<br>Species 2 (#)<br>

Extracted text: For a pathogen of interest there is a potential probiotic (the adjacent phase plane diagram depicts the interaction of these two species: orange = pathogen; blue = probiotic). Currently the carrying capacities are K1 = 550, K2 = 700; and the competition coefficients are ¤12 = 0.6, a21 = 0.9 (1 = pathogen, 2 = probiotic). Which of the following would be a good strategy to make the probiotic more effective at eliminating the pathogen? %3D %3D 1000 800- 600- 400 200- 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Species 1 (#) Species 2 (#)

Jun 11, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here