Answer To: In this assignment, you are to write a research report to critically review microservices. To...
Shubham answered on Mar 21 2023
Section 1: Introduction
Microservices architecture has emerged as a popular approach to building complex software systems, with many pioneers leading the way in its adoption. This architectural style involves decomposing a large application into a set of smaller, independent services that communicate with each other through well-defined APIs. This approach offers numerous benefits such as increased agility, scalability, and resilience.
In this report, it includes exploring the key concepts and principles of microservices architecture, the benefits and challenges of its adoption, and its real-world applications. This examines case studies of successful implementation, as well as strategies for migrating from a monolithic architecture to microservices.
Section 2: Monolith vs Microservices
Monolithic architecture is an approach to building software applications in which the entire application is designed as a single unit, with all the modules and components tightly coupled together. Microservices architecture is an approach in which the application is decomposed into smaller, independent services, each with its own business logic and data storage, and communicates with other services through APIs. In a monolithic architecture, the entire application must be scaled up or down as a single unit, which can be inefficient and expensive. Microservices architecture allows for individual services to be scaled independently, which can lead to greater efficiency and cost savings (Blinowski, Ojdowska and Przybyłek, 2022). Monolithic architecture is inflexible, making it difficult to add new features or update existing ones. Microservices architecture is more flexible, allowing for more rapid development and deployment of new features and services. In monolithic architecture, a failure in any component can bring down the entire system. In microservices architecture, failures are isolated to individual services, so the system as a whole is more resilient. Microservices architecture can be more complex than monolithic architecture, requiring additional development and management resources to build and maintain the individual services.
Monolithic architecture is often simpler to develop and maintain than microservices architecture. It can be easier to understand and debug, and it can be more straightforward to deploy and manage. All components of a monolithic application are tightly coupled, they can communicate with each other more efficiently than services in a microservices architecture, which communicate through APIs. Monolithic architecture can be less expensive to develop and maintain than microservices architecture, particularly for smaller applications.
Monolithic architecture can be challenging to scale, as the entire application must be scaled up or down as a single unit. This can lead to inefficiencies and increased costs. This can result in slower development and deployment times, and can make it harder to keep up with...