Assessment criteria
|
Assessable Components |
HD100% - 85% |
DI84% - 75% |
CR74% - 65% |
PS64% - 50% |
FL49% - 0 |
Abstract section
(5 Marks)
|
A very concise abstract where the aim of study is perfectly articulated, the central question is precisely formulated, |
A concise abstract where the aim of study is appropriately articulated, the research question is formulated. |
A concise abstract where the aim of study is relatively articulated, the research question is adequately formulated. |
A concise abstract where the aim of study is articulated, the research question is vaguely formulated. |
Incomplete abstract with no research question identified. |
Introduction section
(5 Marks)
|
A comprehensive discussion in relation to the research background as well as the aim/objectives of research is included. |
A highly detailed discussion in relation to the significance as well as the aim/objectives of research is included. |
A thorough discussion in relation to the significance as well as the aim/objectives of research is included. |
An adequate discussion in relation to the significance as well as the aim/objectives of research is included |
An incomplete or irrelevant discussion is included. |
Select literature that reflects recent developments in the area and emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research)
(2 Marks)
|
Literature selected magnificently reflects recent developments in the area and completely emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). |
Literature selected clearly reflects recent developments in the area and largely emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). |
Literature selected relatively reflects recent developments in the area and generally emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research).. |
Literature selected relatively reflects recent developments in the area but hardly emphasizes primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). |
Literature selected does not reflect recent developments in the area and does not emphasize primary literature (i.e. journal articles containing original research). |
Identify gaps in the literature.(4 Marks) |
Comprehensive knowledge of the topic and in depth explanation of the issues that are not addressed; |
Reasonable knowledge of the topic and a comprehensive explanation of the issues that are not addressed. |
Provided factual/conceptual knowledge of the topic and an overall explanation of the issues that are not addressed. |
Limited knowledge of the of the topic and a basic explanation of the issues that are not addressed. |
Fails to satisfy minimum requirements of explaining the issues. |
Comment on future research directions based on the identified gaps i.e what other research questions arise from the literature. (4 Marks)
|
The proposed future research direction is well formulated and ably answers all the identified gaps.
|
The proposed future direction is adequately formulated and sufficiently answers most of the identified gaps.
|
The proposed future research direction is adequately formulated and answers some of the identified gaps.
|
The proposed future research direction is either not adequately formulated or does not sufficiently answer the identified gaps.
|
The proposed future research direction is not adequately formulated and does not sufficiently answer the identified gaps |
Be written clearly (with content well organized)
(3 Marks)
|
Highly developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling accurate. Formal English is used throughout. |
Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling accurate. Mostly uses formal English. |
Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors. More or less uses formal English. |
Some skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Meaning apparent, but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar & spelling contains several careless errors. Hardly uses formal English |
Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised. Grammar & spelling contains many errors. Does not use formal English. |
Provide references (at least three) using APA referencing system including in text citations.(2 Marks) |
Faultlessreferencing,includingreference list and in text citations.High qualityreferences. |
Very goodreferencing,includingreference list andin text citations.High qualityreferences. |
Good referencing,includingreference list andin text citations.Good qualityreferences. |
Evidence ofrudimentaryreferencing skills.Mix of good andpoor qualityreferences. |
Sub-standardreferencing.Poor qualityreferences. |