In New York v. Quarles, the Court said, “We think police offi cers can and will distinguish almost instinctively between questions necessary to secure their own safety or the safety of the public and...

In New York v. Quarles, the Court said, “We think police offi cers can and will distinguish almost instinctively between questions necessary to secure their own safety or the safety of the public and questions designed solely to elicit testimonial evidence from a suspect.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Describe three situations in which the distinction might not be so easy for a police offi cer to make.