In a previous year, 57% of femaies aged 15 and older ived alone. Asociologiet tests whether this penrcentageferent today by conditting a random sange of 400 emaes aged 15 and cw and fede hat 221 are...

Mm1

Extracted text: In a previous year, 57% of femaies aged 15 and older ived alone. Asociologiet tests whether this penrcentageferent today by conditting a random sange of 400 emaes aged 15 and cw and fede hat 221 are igne cient evidanoe at the aD.01 level of significance to cendudn the proportion has changed? Identity the nu and altemative hypotheses for this teet vesus H (Tyne integers or decimals Do nol mund) Find the test statistic for this hypothesis test 7 Round to two decimal places as needed.) Delemine he Pvalue for thypothesis tst Pvun Round to three decimal pleces as needed) State the condusion for this hypothens test OA Do not reect H There is not suffcent evidence at the a0.01 evel of signficance to conclude that the proporten of females who are living wone has changed OB Reject H, There is not sutficent evidence at the 001 ievel of signifcance to condude that the proportion of females whe are ng alone has harged OC. Do not reject H There is sumciert evidenos at the a0.01 level of significance to conclude that the proportion of females who ae hng wone h changed OD Reect H, There is sufident evidence at the a-e01 level of signficanoe to concude that the proportion of females who are ving alone has changed i a provicun year, 57% of females aged 15 and older lued alone. A sociolgist tests whether tNs erentagea diferent today by condctrg anandom mple of 40 aie ged 10 and rand trd hat 221 are rg aone here suficient evidence et the 0 el uf sgfcance to condade the proportion tas thanged denty the nat and atematve typotteses for is test H rn H O (Type vge or decimals. Do not round Find the test statatic or this hybothesis beet Round ta to oca plce edd Deiemine the Pvae for this hypothess test Pyalue ound to tree decinal piaten needed) Dute the conduwon for the hypotheeis test OA Dntreject There ia not suficient evidence at the a -0.01 level of mgnficance lo concule al epropotioe of emales wte are tving wone has changed OB Reject , There is not dest evidence at the a001 level of signficanos to canclde that the proporton of fem whe a g aona ha changed OC Do not reject H There is sufficient evidence a the 0.01 ieve of sigifcance te conclute he proportion of temales who engnh changad OD Reject , There is suffcient endence at the aD.01 level of signficance to condude th the proponon at fem whe a ng aone hm chegd