In a Pew Research poll, 287 out of 522 randomly selected U.S. men were able to identify Egypt when it was highlighted on a map of the Middle East. When 520 randomly selected U.S. women were asked, 233...

Extracted text: In a Pew Research poll, 287 out of 522 randomly selected U.S. men were able to identify Egypt when it was highlighted on a map of the Middle East. When 520 randomly selected U.S. women were asked, 233 were able to do so. Let PM - the true proportion of men who can identify Egypt on a map and pw = the true proportion of wornen who can identify Egypt on a map. We are 95% confident that the interval from 0.042 to 0.160 captures PM - pPw the true difference in the proportions of men and women who can identify Egypt on a map. Does this interval give convincing evidence of a difference between the population proportions? Justify your answer. O No. Because the conditions were not met, we cannot use this interval to conclude that there is convincing evidence that the true proportion of men who can identify Egypt on the map is different from the true proportion of women that can identify Egypt on a map. O Yes BecaUSe the interval does not contain negative numbers, there is convíncing evidence that the true proportion of men who can identify Egypt on the map is different than the true proportion of women that can identify Egypt on a map. Ver Berause the interval does not contain 0, there is convincing evidence that the true proportion of men who can identify Egypt on the map is different than the true pronartion of women that can identify Egypt on a map. Daae the interval does not contain negative numbers, there is not convincing evidence that the true proportion of men who can identify Egypt on the map is different than the true proportion of women that can identify Egypt on a map. of women that can identify Egypt on a map. Previous 3748/quizzes/2805503/take/questions/23009145