Identify at least six abstracts across three journals (you're welcome to include more if you choose). Create an annotated abstract bib for the six abstracts.
- In theannotated abstract bib(Links to an external site.)(Links to an external site.)
, include a formatted reference, the annotated abstract (with highlights and comments), and a 1-2 sentence summary for each of the six abstracts (stating the thesis/finding). Then identify two articles from the abstracts that form the conversation you will explore in your Analytic Exploration and describe the topic of the conversation
Use the USF library to find the sources and follow the format from what I attached. It's just a normal assignment, not an essay.
Annotated Abstract Bibliography Assignment: In the annotated abstract bib, include a formatted reference, the annotated abstract (with highlights and comments), and a one-sentence summary for each of the twelve abstracts. Then state three articles from the abstracts that form the conversation you Your annotated abstract bib should list twelve articles (formatted according to the style you choose) from three journals in a specific discipline. Under each article reference, paste the abstract from the article. Annotate the abstract using highlighting and commenting to identify important elements in the abstract. Then write a one-sentence annotation of the content you highlighted in the abstract. 1) Sample of abstract copied and pasted with formatted reference: Messina, Bryan, And Worley, Matthew. “Effects of Craving on Opioid Use Are Attenuated After Pain Coping Counseling in Adults With Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Addiction.” Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, vol. 87, no. 10, Oct. 2019, pp. 918–926. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1037/ccp0000399. Abstract: Risk for prescription opioid addiction is an endemic public health concern, especially for adults with chronic pain. This study examined craving as a mediator from pain to opioid use outcomes during prescription opioid addiction treatment and tested whether counseling in pain coping skills moderated the effects of craving on treatment outcomes. Method: Secondary analysis on a sample (N = 148) randomized to standard or enhanced counseling for 12 weeks with adjunct opioid maintenance medication. Multilevel analyses examined mediated effects between weekly pain, craving, and opioid use, and tested the interaction between craving and a counseling module on pain coping skills. Results: Greater pain predicted greater craving (β = 0.25, p <.001), which="" predicted="" next-week="" opioid="" use="" (β="0.17," p=""><.001). a="" statistically="" significant="" indirect="" effect="" of="" craving="" (β="0.04," 95%="" ci="" [0.02,="" 0.06])="" mediated="" 95%="" of="" the="" total="" effect="" from="" pain="" to="" opioid="" use.="" a="" significant="" interaction="" (b="−0.22," p=""><.01) revealed="" that="" after="" receiving="" the="" pain="" coping="" module,="" the="" association="" between="" craving="" and="" next-week="" opioid="" use="" was="" reduced,="" with="" greater="" exposure="" to="" the="" module="" associated="" with="" stronger="" effects="" (b="−0.12," p=""><.01). conclusion: more severe pain predicts greater opioid use due to the association between pain and cravings. pain coping skills counseling suppressed the association between cravings and opioid use. for adults with chronic pain receiving treatment for prescription opioid addiction, interventions that address cravings through behavioral pain coping skills may be crucial for achieving optimal treatment outcomes. for persons with chronic pain receiving treatment for prescription opioid addiction, our study suggests pain-related cravings increase risk for continued opioid use. results also suggest that counseling in behavioral pain coping skills reduces this risk. questions to consider as you read the abstract: ● what did the study examine? ● who is the sample? ● what was the method? ● what were the results? ● what was the conclusion? 2) sample of an annotated abstract (apa): aleksandrova, y. & parusheva, s. (2019). social media usage patterns in higher education institutions - an empirical study. international journal of emerging technologies in learning, 14(5), 108–121. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9720 abstract: the main goal of this research is to identify some notable trends, opportunities and limitations regarding the application of social media in higher education based on studying the way students use social media during their education. the research is focused on the impact of social media on the process of learning, creation and distribution of education related content, as well as on education related communication. the target groups of the research are students in university of economics - varna enrolled in different bachelor and master programs. an association analysis was implemented to identify the most common patterns regarding the application of social media in the education process. statistical methods for testing hypothesis were used to assess the relationship between students' specialty and derived social media patterns. the findings show that facebook groups are a preferable social media tool for communication with colleagues, content sharing and distribution, while wikis and university learning management systems (lmss) are most used for content creation and additional learning. some social media channels are more preferable for content creation and additional learning compared to scientific databases and e-books. following the research results a conclusion can be drawn regarding the leading part of the students in initiating the use of social media compared to the relatively smaller role of the academic staff in this process. a medium to small relationships were discovered between students' specialty and the application of content sharing communities and forums in knowledge process with students in computer science more likely to use these social media types compared to students in economics 3) template you can use to write the one-sentence annotation of the abstract: lauer, claire, and brumberger, eva. “redefining writing for the responsive workplace.” college composition and communication; urbana vol. 70, iss. 4, (jun 2019): 634-663. in this article we argue that mobile, design, content, and social media technologies have fundamentally redefined the role of the writer in the workplace. rather than the originator of content, the writer is becoming a sort of multimodal editor who revises, redesigns, remediates, and upcycles content into new forms, for new audiences, purposes, and media. this article discusses data gathered from over one hundred hours of embedded workplace research shadowing nine different professional communicators. the data demonstrate the iterative, detailed, product-focused types of work happening within a range of workplace constraints and, in turn, emphasize the need for writers and teachers of writing to recognize the importance of developing a broad skillset to prepare for this kind of work. in (“article title,”) (author full name) (verb: investigates, explores, examines) + (summary of article topic) and (verb: asks, questions, considers) + (state the research question/hypothesis). (last name of author) (verb: argues, demonstrates, finds, reports, claims, asserts) that . . . “quote thesis/conclusion/argument of article with an in-text citation” (#). 4) for each of the twelve abstracts, combine these elements into an abstract bib: ● formatted reference or article ● pasted abstract with highlighting and comments ● one-sentence summary of the abstract sample: https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/indexinglinkhandler/sng/au/lauer,+claire/$n?accountid=14745 https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/indexinglinkhandler/sng/au/brumberger,+eva/$n?accountid=14745 https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/pubidlinkhandler/sng/pubtitle/college+composition+and+communication/$n/40990/docview/2256105558/fulltext/d5c902db54034f0epq/7?accountid=14745 https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/indexingvolumeissuelinkhandler/40990/college+composition+and+communication/02019y06y01$23jun+2019$3b++vol.+70+$284$29/70/4?accountid=14745 poe, mya, and norbert elliot. “evidence of fairness: twenty-five years of research in assessing writing.” assessing writing, vol. 42, oct. 2019. ebscohost, doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100418. abstract: when assessing writing (asw) was founded 25 years ago, conversations about fairness were very much in the air and illustrated sharp divides between teachers and educational measurement researchers. for teachers, fairness was typically associated with consistency and access. for educational measurement researchers, fairness was a technical issue: an assessment that did not identify the presence of β (the bias factor) was fair. since its founding, asw has continued to be a space where evolving discussions about fairness play out. in this article, we examine a selection of 73 asw research studies published from 1994 to 2018 that use fairness as a category of evidence. in tracing the use of fairness and related terms across these research articles, our goal is to understand how the conversation about fairness has changed in the last quarter century. following a literature review that situates fairness within generational, standards-based, and evidential scholarship, we analyze five trends in the journal: fairness as the elimination of bias; fairness as the pursuit of validity; fairness as acknowledgement of social context; fairness as legal responsibility; and fairness as ethical obligation. a tidy narrative that theoretical conceptualization of fairness has deepened over the asw lifespan is not born out by our findings. instead, evidence suggests that the disparate stances and methodological challenges that informed early research on fairness remain. as well, the textual record suggests that we have not developed or shared taxonomies for systematically investigating questions of fairness. in our desire to make the research we present actionable, we close by calling attention to the need for theorization of fairness, the advantages nuanced of research methods, and the benefits of non-western perspectives. annotation: in “evidence of fairness: twenty-five years of research in assessing writing,” poe and elliot examine 73 studies published in assessing writing in an effort to understand how the conversation around fairness in writing studies has changed. poe and elliot analyze five trends and find that many of the challenges remain and systemic means of investigating fairness are still lacking. ultimately, poe and elliot call on researchers to acknowledge “the need for theorization of fairness, the advantages nuanced of research methods, and the benefits of non-western perspectives” (par. 1). conclusion:="" more="" severe="" pain="" predicts="" greater="" opioid="" use="" due="" to="" the="" association="" between="" pain="" and="" cravings.="" pain="" coping="" skills="" counseling="" suppressed="" the="" association="" between="" cravings="" and="" opioid="" use.="" for="" adults="" with="" chronic="" pain="" receiving="" treatment="" for="" prescription="" opioid="" addiction,="" interventions="" that="" address="" cravings="" through="" behavioral="" pain="" coping="" skills="" may="" be="" crucial="" for="" achieving="" optimal="" treatment="" outcomes.="" for="" persons="" with="" chronic="" pain="" receiving="" treatment="" for="" prescription="" opioid="" addiction,="" our="" study="" suggests="" pain-related="" cravings="" increase="" risk="" for="" continued="" opioid="" use.="" results="" also="" suggest="" that="" counseling="" in="" behavioral="" pain="" coping="" skills="" reduces="" this="" risk.="" questions="" to="" consider="" as="" you="" read="" the="" abstract:="" ●="" what="" did="" the="" study="" examine?="" ●="" who="" is="" the="" sample?="" ●="" what="" was="" the="" method?="" ●="" what="" were="" the="" results?="" ●="" what="" was="" the="" conclusion?="" 2)="" sample="" of="" an="" annotated="" abstract="" (apa):="" aleksandrova,="" y.="" &="" parusheva,="" s.="" (2019).="" social="" media="" usage="" patterns="" in="" higher="" education="" institutions="" -="" an="" empirical="" study.="" international="" journal="" of="" emerging="" technologies="" in="" learning,="" 14(5),="" 108–121.="" https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9720="" abstract:="" the="" main="" goal="" of="" this="" research="" is="" to="" identify="" some="" notable="" trends,="" opportunities="" and="" limitations="" regarding="" the="" application="" of="" social="" media="" in="" higher="" education="" based="" on="" studying="" the="" way="" students="" use="" social="" media="" during="" their="" education.="" the="" research="" is="" focused="" on="" the="" impact="" of="" social="" media="" on="" the="" process="" of="" learning,="" creation="" and="" distribution="" of="" education="" related="" content,="" as="" well="" as="" on="" education="" related="" communication.="" the="" target="" groups="" of="" the="" research="" are="" students="" in="" university="" of="" economics="" -="" varna="" enrolled="" in="" different="" bachelor="" and="" master="" programs.="" an="" association="" analysis="" was="" implemented="" to="" identify="" the="" most="" common="" patterns="" regarding="" the="" application="" of="" social="" media="" in="" the="" education="" process.="" statistical="" methods="" for="" testing="" hypothesis="" were="" used="" to="" assess="" the="" relationship="" between="" students'="" specialty="" and="" derived="" social="" media="" patterns.="" the="" findings="" show="" that="" facebook="" groups="" are="" a="" preferable="" social="" media="" tool="" for="" communication="" with="" colleagues,="" content="" sharing="" and="" distribution,="" while="" wikis="" and="" university="" learning="" management="" systems="" (lmss)="" are="" most="" used="" for="" content="" creation="" and="" additional="" learning.="" some="" social="" media="" channels="" are="" more="" preferable="" for="" content="" creation="" and="" additional="" learning="" compared="" to="" scientific="" databases="" and="" e-books.="" following="" the="" research="" results="" a="" conclusion="" can="" be="" drawn="" regarding="" the="" leading="" part="" of="" the="" students="" in="" initiating="" the="" use="" of="" social="" media="" compared="" to="" the="" relatively="" smaller="" role="" of="" the="" academic="" staff="" in="" this="" process.="" a="" medium="" to="" small="" relationships="" were="" discovered="" between="" students'="" specialty="" and="" the="" application="" of="" content="" sharing="" communities="" and="" forums="" in="" knowledge="" process="" with="" students="" in="" computer="" science="" more="" likely="" to="" use="" these="" social="" media="" types="" compared="" to="" students="" in="" economics="" 3)="" template="" you="" can="" use="" to="" write="" the="" one-sentence="" annotation="" of="" the="" abstract:="" lauer,="" claire,="" and="" brumberger,="" eva.="" “redefining="" writing="" for="" the="" responsive="" workplace.”="" college="" composition="" and="" communication;="" urbana="" vol.="" 70,="" iss.="" 4,="" (jun="" 2019):="" 634-663.="" in="" this="" article="" we="" argue="" that="" mobile,="" design,="" content,="" and="" social="" media="" technologies="" have="" fundamentally="" redefined="" the="" role="" of="" the="" writer="" in="" the="" workplace.="" rather="" than="" the="" originator="" of="" content,="" the="" writer="" is="" becoming="" a="" sort="" of="" multimodal="" editor="" who="" revises,="" redesigns,="" remediates,="" and="" upcycles="" content="" into="" new="" forms,="" for="" new="" audiences,="" purposes,="" and="" media.="" this="" article="" discusses="" data="" gathered="" from="" over="" one="" hundred="" hours="" of="" embedded="" workplace="" research="" shadowing="" nine="" different="" professional="" communicators.="" the="" data="" demonstrate="" the="" iterative,="" detailed,="" product-focused="" types="" of="" work="" happening="" within="" a="" range="" of="" workplace="" constraints="" and,="" in="" turn,="" emphasize="" the="" need="" for="" writers="" and="" teachers="" of="" writing="" to="" recognize="" the="" importance="" of="" developing="" a="" broad="" skillset="" to="" prepare="" for="" this="" kind="" of="" work.="" in="" (“article="" title,”)="" (author="" full="" name)="" (verb:="" investigates,="" explores,="" examines)="" +="" (summary="" of="" article="" topic)="" and="" (verb:="" asks,="" questions,="" considers)="" +="" (state="" the="" research="" question/hypothesis).="" (last="" name="" of="" author)="" (verb:="" argues,="" demonstrates,="" finds,="" reports,="" claims,="" asserts)="" that="" .="" .="" .="" “quote="" thesis/conclusion/argument="" of="" article="" with="" an="" in-text="" citation”="" (#). ="" 4)="" for="" each="" of="" the="" twelve="" abstracts,="" combine="" these="" elements="" into="" an="" abstract="" bib:="" ●="" formatted="" reference="" or="" article="" ●="" pasted="" abstract="" with="" highlighting="" and="" comments="" ●="" one-sentence="" summary="" of="" the="" abstract="" sample:="" https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/indexinglinkhandler/sng/au/lauer,+claire/$n?accountid="14745" https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/indexinglinkhandler/sng/au/brumberger,+eva/$n?accountid="14745" https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/pubidlinkhandler/sng/pubtitle/college+composition+and+communication/$n/40990/docview/2256105558/fulltext/d5c902db54034f0epq/7?accountid="14745" https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/indexingvolumeissuelinkhandler/40990/college+composition+and+communication/02019y06y01$23jun+2019$3b++vol.+70+$284$29/70/4?accountid="14745" poe,="" mya,="" and="" norbert="" elliot.="" “evidence="" of="" fairness:="" twenty-five="" years="" of="" research="" in="" assessing="" writing.”="" assessing="" writing,="" vol.="" 42,="" oct.="" 2019.="" ebscohost,="" doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100418.="" abstract:="" when="" assessing="" writing="" (asw)="" was="" founded="" 25="" years="" ago,="" conversations="" about="" fairness="" were="" very="" much="" in="" the="" air="" and="" illustrated="" sharp="" divides="" between="" teachers="" and="" educational="" measurement="" researchers.="" for="" teachers,="" fairness="" was="" typically="" associated="" with="" consistency="" and="" access.="" for="" educational="" measurement="" researchers,="" fairness="" was="" a="" technical="" issue:="" an="" assessment="" that="" did="" not="" identify="" the="" presence="" of="" β="" (the="" bias="" factor)="" was="" fair.="" since="" its="" founding,="" asw="" has="" continued="" to="" be="" a="" space="" where="" evolving="" discussions="" about="" fairness="" play="" out.="" in="" this="" article,="" we="" examine="" a="" selection="" of="" 73="" asw="" research="" studies="" published="" from="" 1994="" to="" 2018="" that="" use="" fairness="" as="" a="" category="" of="" evidence.="" in="" tracing="" the="" use="" of="" fairness="" and="" related="" terms="" across="" these="" research="" articles,="" our="" goal="" is="" to="" understand="" how="" the="" conversation="" about="" fairness="" has="" changed="" in="" the="" last="" quarter="" century.="" following="" a="" literature="" review="" that="" situates="" fairness="" within="" generational,="" standards-based,="" and="" evidential="" scholarship,="" we="" analyze="" five="" trends="" in="" the="" journal:="" fairness="" as="" the="" elimination="" of="" bias;="" fairness="" as="" the="" pursuit="" of="" validity;="" fairness="" as="" acknowledgement="" of="" social="" context;="" fairness="" as="" legal="" responsibility;="" and="" fairness="" as="" ethical="" obligation.="" a="" tidy="" narrative="" that="" theoretical="" conceptualization="" of="" fairness="" has="" deepened="" over="" the="" asw="" lifespan="" is="" not="" born="" out="" by="" our="" findings.="" instead,="" evidence="" suggests="" that="" the="" disparate="" stances="" and="" methodological="" challenges="" that="" informed="" early="" research="" on="" fairness="" remain.="" as="" well,="" the="" textual="" record="" suggests="" that="" we="" have="" not="" developed="" or="" shared="" taxonomies="" for="" systematically="" investigating="" questions="" of="" fairness.="" in="" our="" desire="" to="" make="" the="" research="" we="" present="" actionable,="" we="" close="" by="" calling="" attention="" to="" the="" need="" for="" theorization="" of="" fairness,="" the="" advantages="" nuanced="" of="" research="" methods,="" and="" the="" benefits="" of="" non-western="" perspectives.="" annotation:="" in="" “evidence="" of="" fairness:="" twenty-five="" years="" of="" research="" in="" assessing="" writing,”="" poe="" and="" elliot="" examine="" 73="" studies="" published="" in="" assessing="" writing="" in="" an="" effort="" to="" understand="" how="" the="" conversation="" around="" fairness="" in="" writing="" studies="" has="" changed.="" poe="" and="" elliot="" analyze="" five="" trends="" and="" find="" that="" many="" of="" the="" challenges="" remain="" and="" systemic="" means="" of="" investigating="" fairness="" are="" still="" lacking.="" ultimately,="" poe="" and="" elliot="" call="" on="" researchers="" to="" acknowledge="" “the="" need="" for="" theorization="" of="" fairness,="" the="" advantages="" nuanced="" of="" research="" methods,="" and="" the="" benefits="" of="" non-western="" perspectives”="" (par.="">