I will attach the list of resources you should use for this assignment please do not use any other thing apart from the prescribed texts
Microsoft Word - MGT301A_Assessment_3_Brief 102020.doc ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT301A: Ethics and Sustainability Assessment Scenario Report Individual/Group Group and Individual Length 2000 words (+/ 10%) Peer review form Learning Outcomes a) Identify questions of ethics and sustainability and analyse how they impact on one’s day-to-day work experience. b) Apply a range of ethical frameworks and develop a vocabulary for ethical issues. c) Demonstrate the ability to apply the various frameworks that underpin how individuals and organisations make decisions on complex ethical issues. d) Analyse the impact of economic, commercial, social and environmental trends on organisation’s ethical and sustainability behaviours. e) Explore specific sustainability tools such as values based management and stakeholder perspectives. f) Evaluate the role of the individual as an agent of ethical and sustainable behaviour in organisations. Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of module 6.1 (week 11) For Intensive (6 week) class by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6.1 (Week 6) Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks Context This assessment allows students to develop writing skills in ethics and sustainability scenarios and to explore the ways in which stakeholder theory and values management can be used by organisations, as tools in addressing economic, commercial, social and environmental problems. Instructions Group task You will be allocated to a group of three students who, in module 5.1 (week 9) and module 5.2 (week 10) will prepare a short written scenario that describes one ethical or sustainability issue facing an organisation of your choice. A framework for writing the scenario will be provided in class, and available later as an online resource in Blackboard. Individual task You will then use the group scenario to prepare an individual report. The scenario report will take the form of a business case, made to the senior management of the organisation, recommending how the issue should be dealt with. The report will employ either stakeholder theory or values management as an analytical tool. • Structure 1. Executive summary (100 words) 2. Introduction (100 words) 3. Summary of scenario (200 words) 4. Description of theory used for analysis (stakeholder theory OR values management) (400 words) 5. Analysis (750 words) 6. Identification of 3 alternative solutions (250 words) 7. Recommendations (100 words) 8. Conclusion (100 words) 9. Reference list (excluded from word count) This assessment task should include appropriate academic referencing and a reference list following APA 6th edition style of referencing. Please see the Academic Skills page on Blackboard for information on referencing in APA 6th: https://laureate- au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id =_2498849_1 Peer review Each member of the group will review the contribution of other group members, to the task, using the Peer Review Form. You can find this form in the corresponding Assessment folder in Blackboard. The Peer Review Form focuses on the ways each group member behaves, in relation to ethics, throughout the activity. You will have to use one Peer Review Form, per group member, and collate these in a single document for submission. Your mark for this assessment will be based, equally, on the review provided by your peers. Scenario report The Learning Rubric is your guide to how your assessment will be marked. Please be sure to check this rubric very carefully before submission. Submission Instructions Submit the Individual Scenario Report and Peer Review Form by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of module 6.1 (week 11) ) & For Intensive (6 week) class by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6.1 (Week 6) via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MGT301A: Ethics and Sustainability. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief 102020 Page 2 of 6 Learning Rubric: Assessment 3- Scenario Report Assessment Fail (Unacceptable) Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction (Functional) (Proficient) 65-74% (Advanced) (Exceptional) Attributes 049% 50-64% 75 -84% 85-100% Knowledge and Report does not address Report addresses the Report addresses most Report addresses the full Report addresses the full Understanding as the question, basic components of the components of the components of the components of the reflected in research demonstrates limited question, demonstrates question, demonstrates a question, demonstrates a question, demonstrates a and analysis. understanding of the only a cursory good understanding of the very good understanding comprehensive topic with limited/no understanding of the topic and develops most of the topic and develops understanding of the developed aspects of topic and develops the aspects of the task. all aspects of the task. topic and develops the task. minimum aspects of the Report t justifies personal Report discriminates thorough and critical task. analysis of the task. 30% Report indicates opinion, by utilising between assertion of confusion of personal Report indicates some evidence and information personal opinion and Report systematically opinion and information confusion of personal from independent information and critically (substantiated by opinion and information research. (substantiated by robust discriminates between evidence) from the (substantiated by Report shows sufficient evidence) from assertion of personal research/course evidence) from the independent research opinion and information evidence of research or materials. research/course and extended reading. substantiated by robust enquiry. materials. evidence from Report shows little/no Report shows substantial independent research. evidence of research or Report shows basic evidence of research or enquiry. evidence of research or enquiry. Report shows exceptional enquiry. evidence of research or enquiry and indicates serious contemplation of sources and extended reading. MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief 102020 Page 3 of 6 Identification of Requires a clearer Alternative solutions and Alternative solutions and Alternative solutions and Alternative solutions and solutions and identification of recommendations have recommendations have recommendations have recommendations have recommendations alternative solutions and been identified. A basic been proficiently been effectively identified. been skilfully identified. recommendations. standard of justification is identified. A discerning and critical An expert standard of 30% Requires justification, inconsistently based on a A good standard of standard of justification justification based on based on analysis of satisfactory level of justification, based on a based on in-depth critical, in-depth analysis, theoretical frameworks analysis and superficially good level of analysis, and analysis, and well and supported by and academic resources, supported by evidence partially supported by supported by evidence to evidence thoroughly, to as applied to the to address the evidence to address the address the organisation’s address the organisation’s organisation’s context organisation’s organisation’s ethical/sustainability ethical/sustainability and ethical/sustainability ethical/sustainability issue. issue. issue. ethical/sustainability issue. issue. Structure and Flow of Report does not present Report presents Report presents Report presents Report presents Ideas information and information and evidence information and evidence information and evidence information and evidence evidence adequately. sufficiently, however clearly and logically. clearly and logically. clearly and logically. 20% requires further logic and more clarity. Report lacks logical/clear Report has a good Report has a sufficient Report has a good structure and flow of structure, with a good flow structure, however flow of structure, with a good ideas, making it difficult Report has a sufficient of ideas. ideas are a challenge and flow of ideas. to understand. structure, however flow can be difficult to of ideas are a challenge Line of reasoning is of a understand. Line of reasoning is of a Line of reasoning is and can be difficult to good standard and easy to professional standard and unclear and difficult to understand. follow. Line of reasoning is of an easy to follow. follow. exceptional standard and Line of reasoning is easy to follow. passable, however, can sometimes be difficult to follow and requires clarity. MGT301A Assessment 3 Brief 102020 Page 4 of 6 Correct citation of key resources and evidence 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Does not use sufficient sources. Does not include correct references or in- text citations; does not use APA 6th style. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, however, these are not always explicit or well- developed.