MITS5001 Assignment 2 MITS5001 IT Project Management Research Report July 2019 MITS5001 Assignment 2 Copyright © XXXXXXXXXXVIT, All Rights Reserved. 2 Research Report (Individual Assignment) - 10%...

1 answer below »
i want to have 3 different assignments on this assignment


MITS5001 Assignment 2 MITS5001 IT Project Management Research Report July 2019 MITS5001 Assignment 2 Copyright © 2015-2018 VIT, All Rights Reserved. 2 Research Report (Individual Assignment) - 10% (Due week 8) Objective(s) This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to improve student presentation skills and to give students experience in researching a topic and writing a report relevant to the Unit of Study subject matter. INSTRUCTIONS For this component you will prepare a report or critique on an industry project related to IT Project Management. The paper you select must be directly relevant to the topic. The paper can be from any academic conference or other relevant Journal or online sources such as Google Scholar, Academic department repositories etc... All students must select a different project, thus the project must be approved by your instructor or tutor before proceeding. In case two students are wanting to report on the same project, the first who emails the instructor with their choice will be allocated that project (provided it is acceptable). Note: popular magazine articles, web sites and blogs are not academic sources. Your report should be limited to approx. 1500 words (not including references). Use 1.5 spacing with a 12 point Times New Roman font. Though your paper will largely be based on the chosen article, you can use other sources to support your discussion. Citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the IEEE style. Your report or critique must include: • Title Page: The title of the assessment, the name of the project you are reviewing and your name and student ID. • Introduction: A statement of the purpose for your report and a brief outline of how you will discuss the selected article (one or two paragraphs). Make sure to identify the article being reviewed. • Body of Report: Describe the intention and content of the article. Research an IT industry project and present your findings on how was the project managed, methodology used or your recommendation, what was implemented well in the project and any lessons learnt. MITS5001 Assignment 2 Copyright © 2015-2018 VIT, All Rights Reserved. 3 • Conclusion: A summary of the points you have made in the body of the paper. The conclusion should not introduce any ‘new’ material that was not discussed in the body of the paper. (One or two paragraphs) • References: A list of sources used in your text. They should be listed alphabetically by (first) author’s family name. Follow the IEEE style. • The footer must include your name, student ID, and page number. Resources There are a number of resources you can utilize for finding academic articles and you should make the most of these resources. 1. The VIT Library has access to an extensive array of on-line journals including IEEE and ACM journals. You can access these online Journals through the library’s subscription to the ProQuest platform. You can access this platform by finding the ‘ProQuest academic platform’ link on the StudyBoard@vit home page, towards the bottom of the page in the left column under the heading Resources & Services. 2. Please also refer to the link in the same section on ‘Scholarly Article Searching’. This will show you how to search or articles of the type required for this assignment. 3. In the same section, additionally refer to the link ‘VIT Library Referencing’. This link discusses a number of referencing styles. Different types of Journals will require different styles of referencing and citation, but this assignment requires the IEEE style. Commonly associated with Engineering and Science disciplines. This style is discussed in the document and provides examples and links to further resources. 4. Google Scholar ‘https://scholar.google.com.au/‘ is a separate google search engine that will help you search for scholarly articles (Journal articles and conference papers etc..). It will generally not have access to the resources that Proquest above does as these are usually paid sites. However Google Scholar does index an extremely large amount of scholarly articles located in open access conferences, Journals and academic web sites. Please go through the above notes ‘Scholarly Article Searching’ to find out how to use Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com.au/ https://scholar.google.com.au/ MITS5001 Assignment 2 Copyright © 2015-2018 VIT, All Rights Reserved. 4 Submission Guidelines All submissions are to be submitted through turn-it-in. Drop-boxes linked to turn-it-in will be set up in the Unit of Study Moodle account. Assignments not submitted through these drop-boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above) and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be penalized at the rate of 10% per day (including weekend days). The turn-it-in similarity score will be used in determining the level if any of plagiarism. Turn-it-in will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class member submissions for plagiarism. You can see your turn-it-in similarity score when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your assignment and re-submit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed you cannot make re-submissions and you will have to live with the similarity score as there will be no chance for changing. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of this feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please remember we only see the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission. Your document should be a single word or pdf document containing your report.
Answered Same DaySep 10, 2021MITS5001

Answer To: MITS5001 Assignment 2 MITS5001 IT Project Management Research Report July 2019 MITS5001 Assignment 2...

Kuldeep answered on Sep 13 2021
163 Votes
Project Manager
Project Manager
Article Review
Student Name:
University Name:
Unit Name:
Date:
Contents
Introduction    3
Outline of the article    3
Intention and content of the article    4
Lesson learnt    5
Conclusion    6
References    8
Introduction
Outline of the article
The article “Researchers’ experience with project ma
nagement in health and medical research: Results from a post-project review” seeks to address how the project manager is the person who can apply a large number of activities, knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to meet needs of a specific project; according to the PMBOK the project manager is the person who is appointed by association to attain the project goals [1]. But, today in the field of medical and health research in Brazil, management of the scientific projects clearly shows the lack of the qualified project management. The introduction of this article provides a good, generalized background of the topic and authors also claims that funding agencies despite the many requests for the research projects and institutions, the way in which the projects are organize needs to be improved. Published study about researchers' experience with the project management (PM) in medical and health research. Authors began with the statement that the project management is extensively utilize to deliver the projects in timely, budgetary and defined quality; nevertheless, there is the little published data describing its uses in managing healthcare projects. While there is a lack of knowledge about PM in healthcare research, two elements need to be considered and presented: performance evaluation, which includes time, cost, efficiency and quality, remains an significant criterion for evaluating project performance; considering or correctly utilizing various levels of the project, for example: logic analysis; Period estimates; Calculation of project time; Source constraint effects; Adjustments to achieve project goals; Creating and updating action plans for action during project progress.
However, to make motivation clearer as well as to differentiate author critically examine that is very difficult to speak whether health care researchers have knowledge of training or criteria as well as project management levels, and this information is the main difference in the scientific production. Hence, what is different from researchers who may participate in huge research teams and offer high productivity? Authors of this article did an interesting study identify project managers who were highly regarded by clients, peers, and another project stakeholders. During that time period, throughout the discussion, patterns emerge that support the general characteristics of these executives. This feature, presented below, appears to be main difference between the researchers and others with wide scientific production. Researchers report on alcohol and pregnancy and project management in this paper and whether the project has made any difference.
It is clear from the article that the output and results of the project have been achieved and we used project management to plan, implement, monitor and control all aspects of the project. Sixteen researchers were asking to absolute self-administered questionnaires for subsequent review of...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here