Sneaker 2013 This case was prepared by Richard T. Bliss, Professor of Finance, and Mark Potter, Associate Professor of Finance, at Babson College, based on published sources. It was developed as a...

1 answer below »
I only need the first part of the assignment (14 questions) completed for the Sneaker Case 2013. I need everything cell referenced.You will set up a capital budgeting analysis on the first (Sneaker 2013) project. The instructions are listed below. Additionally I provided a spreadsheet that can be used for setting up the capitalbudgetfor this project


Sneaker 2013 This case was prepared by Richard T. Bliss, Professor of Finance, and Mark Potter, Associate Professor of Finance, at Babson College, based on published sources. It was developed as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. It is not intended to serve as an endorsement, source of primary data or illustration of effective or ineffective management. Copyright © 2014 Babson College and licensed for publication to Harvard Business Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication can be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of Babson College. 1 BAB166 NOVEMBER 2014 Sneaker 2013 The Situation It was 6:35 p.m. on a Friday as Michelle Rodriguez held her head in her hands and sought to regain focus. Her company, New Balance, based in Brighton, Massachusetts, had recently implemented a policy on work-life balance. She had just made the mistake of opening an email from the senior VP of product development, Monte Holliday, who needed a position report by Monday morning on one of New Balance’s most promising new athletic shoes. On the heels of the 2012 London Olympics, New Balance saw an opportunity in the 12- to 18-year-old male segment of the market, which their larger competitors had ignored. Established, well-known Olympic athletes like Usain Bolt already had multi-million dollar endorsement deals for athletic footwear, and they dominated the age 18 to 24 male market for running shoes.1 New Balance did not have the resources or the star power to compete in this segment. However, New Balance saw an opportunity to target a younger consumer if they could craft an effective marketing and advertising campaign around the right athlete. Holliday and New Balance CEO Jim Davis had just returned from London after holding preliminary meetings with several potential new endorsers. The most promising was a 19-year-old phenomenon from Grenada named Kirani James. By winning gold in the 400-meter dash in London, James became the first runner from outside the United States to win the event in more than three decades.2 With a winning time of 43.94 seconds, he was also the first non-U.S. runner to finish the 400 under 44 seconds. James’s victory was a huge feat for his country. Grenada had never won any Olympic medal, much less gold, and he returned home to a hero’s welcome. His relative youth, and the fact that many 1 In 2010, Bolt, then 24 years old, signed a new contract with Puma that paid him $9 million annually. 2 Before James, the last non-American to win the Olympic 400 race was Russian Viktor Markin in 1980, the year the United States boycotted the Moscow Games. For the exclusive use of g. farmer, 2021. This document is authorized for use only by gabe farmer in FIN 449 Winter 2021 taught by Claire Lending, Western Washington University from Jan 2021 to Jun 2021. BAB166 NOVEMBER 2014 Sneaker 2013 2 observers felt James was still improving, made him a likely contender for years to come. New Balance saw James as the perfect athlete to appeal to a younger audience, and Davis wanted him on board. As the afterglow of the Olympic flame faded, Davis knew they needed to act quickly to capitalize on James’s new-found global fame. In spite of the economic downturn and subsequent forecasts of the demise of athletic footwear, the multi-billion dollar athletic footwear industry continued to grow steadily, if not spectacularly. A recent industry report claimed that 2012 would be the best athletic footwear market in over a decade. At the high end of the market, new high-tech shoes were coming out at a rapid pace. Air Jordan Retros, the Nike Mag Flux Capacitor, Reebok Pump Twilight Zone, and the Ewing 33 Hi were selling well. The highly anticipated LeBron Nike X Plus, due out in fall 2012 and forecast to retail for a staggering $315, incorporated technology and pressure/motion sensors that would track and store data on distance, speed, and jumping height. The shoe New Balance had designed for James was envisioned as a medium-tech, high quality running shoe at a reasonable price just under $200 retail. It would be marketed globally and had been tentatively dubbed Sneaker 2013 until a final name could be selected. The business case for Sneaker 2013 needed to be thorough and complete. It required input from sales and marketing, technology engineers, manufacturing, and finance. The data were organized and thorough, and it was up to Rodriguez to come up with a compelling analysis and a recommendation about whether to proceed. She knew her boss and the New Balance CEO were excited at the idea of Sneaker 2013 and at having Kirani James as their newest athlete endorser. But she also knew that all the excitement and flash in the world could not make up for a project if the financials did not work. Sneaker 2013 The business case team had compiled the following baseline information surrounding the Sneaker 2013 project: 1. The life of the Sneaker 2013 project was expected to be six years. Assume the analysis took place at the end of 2012. 2. The suggested retail price of the shoe was $190. Gross margins for high-end athletic footwear averaged about 40% at the retail level, meaning each pair sold would net New Balance $115. For the exclusive use of g. farmer, 2021. This document is authorized for use only by gabe farmer in FIN 449 Winter 2021 taught by Claire Lending, Western Washington University from Jan 2021 to Jun 2021. BAB166 NOVEMBER 2014 Sneaker 2013 3 3. The global athletic footwear market in 2011 totaled approximately $74.5 billion and was expected to grow at a CAGR of 1.8% from 2011 to 2018, reaching $84.4 billion by 2018.3 Based on market research and analysis of other recent athlete endorsements, the New Balance marketing division estimated the following sales volumes for Sneaker 2013: Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Pairs sold (millions) 1.2 1.6 1.4 2.4 1.8 0.9 The 2016 number assumed Kirani James participated in the 2016 games in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and won at least one medal.4 4. For the first two years, the introduction of Sneaker 2013 would reduce sales of existing New Balance shoes as follows: Lost sales: 2013: $35 million 2014: $15 million Assume the lost revenue had the same margins as Sneaker 2013. 5. In order to produce the shoe, the firm needed to build a factory in Vietnam. This required an immediate outlay of $150 million, to be depreciated on a 39-year MACRS5 basis. Depreciation percentages for the first six years respectively were: 2.6%, 5%, 4.7%, 4.5%, 4.3%, and 4.0%. The firm’s analysts estimated the building would be sold for $102 million at project termination. This “salvage value” has not been taken into consideration when computing annual depreciation charges.6 6. The company must immediately purchase equipment costing $15 million. Freight and installation of the equipment would cost $5 million. The cost of equipment and freight/installation was to be depreciated on a five-year MACRS basis. Depreciation percentages for the six years respectively were: 20%, 32%, 19%, 12%, 11%, and 6%. It was believed the equipment could be sold for $3 million upon project termination. 7. In order to manufacture Sneaker 2013, two of the firm’s working capital accounts were expected to increase immediately. Approximately $15 million of inventory would be needed quickly to fill the supply chain, and accounts payable were expected to increase by $5 million. By the end of 2013, the accounts receivable balance would be 8% of project revenue; the inventory balance would be 25% of the project’s variable costs; and accounts payable would be 20% of the project’s variable costs. All working capital would be recovered at the end of the project by the end of the sixth year. 8. Variable costs were expected to be 55% of revenue. 3 http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-footwear-market-is-expected-to-reach-usd-2115-billion-in- 2018-transparency-market-research-170231636.html, accessed October 2014. 4 By comparison, when Usain Bolt set the then 100-meter world record of 9.69 seconds at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, Puma sold two million pairs of his shoes in two days. http://www.moublog.com/2009/08/, accessed October 2014. 5 Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System, the current U.S. tax depreciation method. 6 Including salvage value in depreciation computations is done for financial reporting purposes. Here, the concern is for cash flow impacts of taxes. For tax purposes, it is not necessary for firms to incorporate salvage value. For the exclusive use of g. farmer, 2021. This document is authorized for use only by gabe farmer in FIN 449 Winter 2021 taught by Claire Lending, Western Washington University from Jan 2021 to Jun 2021. http://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/athletic-footwear-market.html BAB166 NOVEMBER 2014 Sneaker 2013 4 9. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were expected to be $7 million per year. 10. Kirani James would be paid $2 million per year for his endorsement of Sneaker 2013, with an additional $1 million Olympic bonus in 2016. 11. Other advertising and promotion costs were estimated as follows: Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 A&P Expense (millions) $25 $15 $10 $30 $25 $15 12. New Balance had already spent $2 million in research and development on Sneaker 2013. 13. The Sneaker 2013 project was to be financed using a combination of equity and debt. The
Answered Same DayJan 28, 2021

Answer To: Sneaker 2013 This case was prepared by Richard T. Bliss, Professor of Finance, and Mark Potter,...

Tanmoy answered on Jan 29 2021
149 Votes
Sneakers
        SNEAKERS 2013 - Assumptions        2013    2014    2015    2016    2017    2018
        ($ millions)
        Sales (millions of pairs)        1.2    1.6    1.4    2.4    1.8    0.9
        Price/pair        $115.0    $115.0
    $115.0    $115.0    $115.0    $115.0
        Cannibalization         $35.0    $15.0
        Var Costs (% of Revenue)        55%    55%    55%    55%    55%    55%
        SG&A Expenses:        $7.0    $7.0    $7.0    $7.0    $7.0    $7.0
        Endorsement:        $2.0    $2.0    $2.0    $3.0    $2.0    $2.0
        Other Advertising & Promotion:        $25.0    $15.0    $10.0    $30.0    $25.0    $15.0
        A/R (% of net revenue)        8%    8%    8%    8%    8%    0%
        Inventory (% of Var Costs)        25%    25%    25%    25%    25%    0%
        A/P (% of Var Cost)        20%    20%    20%    20%    20%    0%
        Factory Expansion:    $150.0
        Equipment:    $15.0
        Freight and Installation:    $5.0
        Inventory    $15.0
        A/P    $5.0
        Tax Rate:    40%
        Factory MV (year 6)                            $102.0
        Equipment MV (year 6)                            $3.0
        "Sneaker 2013" Projected Project Cash Flow Statements ($ millions)
            2012    2013    2014    2015    2016    2017    2018        Calculation/ Formula
        Revenues        $138.0    $184.0    $161.0    $276.0    $207.0    $103.5        Volume Sales x Price/pair
        Cannibalization (Erosion)        -$35.0    -$15.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0        As noted above
        Net Revenues (after erosion)        $103.0    $169.0    $161.0    $276.0    $207.0    $103.5        Subtotal
        Variable Costs        -56.7    -93.0    -88.6    -151.8    -113.9    -56.9        Var Cost % x Net Revenue
        S G & A Expenses        -7.0    -7.0    -7.0    -7.0    -7.0    -7.0        As noted above
        Endorsement        -2.0    -2.0    -2.0    -3.0    -2.0    -2.0        As noted above
        Advertising & Promotion        -25.0    -15.0    -10.0    -30.0    -25.0    -15.0        As noted above
        Factory depreciation (39 yr. MACRS)        -3.9    -7.5    -7.1    -6.8    -6.5    -6.0        Factory Cost x Depreciation %
        Equipment depreciation (5 yr. MACRS)        -4.0    -6.4    -3.8    -2.4    -2.2    -1.2        (Equipment + Shipping,Inst) x Depr %
         ...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here