I need you to write 3 pages following the instruction i posted you can also use the resources i uploaded issue proposal.docx
An annotated bibliography is a list of sources on a specific topic that includes a summary of each source. As you research your topic, construct an annotated bibliography of relevant sources. Your final annotated bibliography should include annotations for at least ten sources that represent multiple perspectives on your issue. Please note: your next paper will require you to summarize sources that advocate at least three different positions on your issue, so you can save time on that paper by including in your annotated bibliography sources that support at least three distinct positions. The list should be complied in alphabetical order using Modern Language Association (MLA) style. Consult the Purdue OWL website ( https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/ ) for directions on how to format entries. Your annotation for each source should consist of two paragraphs. In the first, answer the following questions: 1. What kind of source is it — e.g., a book, journal article, magazine article, newspaper article, encyclopedia entry, database summary article, website, etc.? 2. What is the genre of the piece — e.g., a news report, an editorial, a report of scientific research, a summary of a number of sources? What is the purpose of the text? 3. Who is/are the author/authors? What are the author’s credentials? How does the author establish his or her authority to speak on this subject? Also consider the credibility of the publication venue. 4. Who is the intended audience? Consider where the text is published, the degree of specialized knowledge needed to understand the text, and how objective or argumentative the text is. 5. When was the text published? How does the publication date affect the relevance and usefulness of the source? The second paragraph should include the following: 1. A summary of the content of the piece in a way that demonstrates you have read the source and understood its content. 2. If the source is an argument, as opposed to a purely informational text, identify its main claim and supporting reasons. 3. Explain how you plan to use the source in your Researched Position Paper (obviously this plan may change as you conduct further research and begin drafting). For example, will you use the source for background information, and if so, what information specifically do you plan to use? Does the source contain evidence that you plan to borrow, and if so, what evidence? If the source is an argument, will you position it as an ally or an opponent, and why? For examples of Annotated Bibliography entries, consult the "Annotated Bibliography" sample available in our course. Also, for additional criteria view the Annotated Bibliography rubric below. Annotated Bibliography Rubric Student: _________________________________________ Worth 2pts each: 1. MLA citation for the source, 1. A summary that demonstrates that you have read the source and understand the content, 1. A response to the text, and 1. A note about how you will use the information in your research. Entry #1 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #2 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #3 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #4 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #5 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #6 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #7 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #8 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #9 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: Entry #10 Citation 2 1 0 Summary 2 1 0 Response 2 1 0 Usability 2 1 0 Total: ____/10pts. Summaries, responses, and evaluations are concise, clear, and thorough. Notes: ____/10pts. Sources are current, relevant, credible, and offer multiple perspectives on your issue. Notes: Final Total:/100 Additional Comments: Joo cheoi Professor Diane Pearman ENGL-1302 section -042 30 September 2020 Anti Vaccination Movement The ongoing debate over the vaccination of children has been expanded to new limits; there are some clear divisions of opinions among the parents about the process of vaccination. The debate is like the process through which, the safety concerns of the parents across nation come forward. The health and immunity of children remain on high priority; but in the absence of vaccines, the children might be prone to several unwanted risks related to the healthcare. The rejection of vaccination for some communities is criticized by media and other social factors that support it. What makes this whole topic relevant is to see the significance of vaccination in covering the healthcare risks and what counterarguments are given. I favor the vaccination given to children because it ensures their safety for life and at the same time, it prepares them to be an immune person for the future. At first, it is significant to note here what arguments and their counters are provided in order to either support or denounce the vaccination process. The two different ideologies are provided as below: The supporters of vaccination movement refer to various diseases whose cure is either critical or not yet found. It is only the early childhood vaccination that can save the lives of children, in case they are disposed to risky environments. The whole process is not looked or examined by the parents; they feel that their children are safe in the hands of doctors who are professional care takers of not only their children but also of the vaccines. There are various diseases that have no known cure so far; once the child is trapped in it, his or her life is surely in danger. The only way of protection is vaccination. However, the opposing community to the above does not support that their children should be given any kind of vaccine because a vaccine is a mild form of virus that is injected in the body. The myth is that the body of the children is too weak to handle the process of developing antibodies against the virus and, therefore; several problems related to the immunization of the child begin. Parents are unable to handle these complications though; most of them are just myths as there are no strong evidences given to them. In the light of the recent medical researchers, some myths related to the vaccination have been justified. Some vaccines have adverse effects. For example, the vaccine of chicken pox developed in 18th century is said to have some complications to affect the child with mental disorders. These disorders lead to problems related to the overall wellbeing of the child. The rise and accessibility of internet also have played a pivotal role in making people aware about how a vaccine works. In spite of having several profitable aspects, the process of vaccine is compromised for some communities in the light of the knowledge that they have. Hussein A & Ali S. 2018. The Anti-vaccination Movement: A Regression in Modern Medicine. NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122668/ The study highlights that the etiology and pathophysiology of this disease is far from being elucidated and there is currently no curative therapy, despite substantial progress in the study of the epidemiology and genetics of autism. While solid scientific study continues, a number of nonscientific and pure theories about autism have arisen in an effort to find explanations and solutions. Hussein also concludes that in view of the highly infectious existence of diseases such as measles, 96 to 99 percent vaccination rates are important to maintain herd immunity and avoid potential outbreaks. Davidson M. 2017. Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies Vaccination as a Cause of Autism-Myths and Controversies. NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789217/ In this article, Davidson details some of the facts related to the problems and myths that are common with vaccination. On medicinal grounds, some of these myths are concluded i.e. they are given proper explanation and are not perceived as null and void. However, some string perceptions still exist because they are justified by medical researchers. This is one of the main sources behind anti-vaccination movement to take place. For example, it is proved that due to the impacts of some of the vaccines, frequent symptoms of Autism in children become prominent. The question before the parents appears that how they can permit something that increases the degree of vulnerability of their children to something which would not occur, if they were not given any vaccine. Such myths break the morale of the parents and they oppose the idea of vaccination. Till now we have seen about the myths and negativity being inculcated by certain anti vaccination groups or population and trying to showcase it to the larger audiences about the same. But under the guidance of WHO and the support of all major countries of the world the helpful actions and benefits are seen and cannot be ignored