I need to make a poster for my assessment on
What is a 'design mindset' in the context of innovation?
And here are the important information
You are required to address this question byDESIGNING a POSTER, whichVISUALLY DISPLAYSyour literature research. In order to be successful in this assessment, you are therefore required to design a carefully constructed and logical poster, which displays your understanding of what a 'design mindset' is in the context of innovation. More specifically, your poster should:
- clearly show the main message of the poster;
- be logically structured and aesthetically pleasing;
- refer to material you have read in the literature (you should include a MINIMUM of 5 references - in-text references and a reference list in APA style must be included on the poster; please see Moodle for some examples of how this can be achieved in a visually pleasing manner);
- clearly address the question;
- contain sufficient detail that a layperson (without specific background in Design Thinking) can understand what you are trying to say;
- use relevant graphics to visually display the message of your poster; and
- use text sparingly.
It is recommended that you useone single PowerPoint slide as your poster(other software may be used).
MGMT20140 ASSESSMENT ITEM 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. If high similarity derived purely from reference lists and/or the fact that you may have copied the assessment brief into your submission, no comments are made as you can find this information out yourself by exploring the similarity score on your Turnitin report. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address. Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) 6 (Excellent) 1. Demonstrate understanding of Design Thinking by providing correct information on the poster. 30% No understanding demonstrated. Poster content is highly incorrect, and/or irrelevant for the topic or poster is purely opinion-based. Information on the poster is incorrect and/or irrelevant for the topic. Poster content may be overly based on own opinion to demonstrate understanding. Information on the poster is incorrect and/or irrelevant for the topic. Poster content may be overly based on own opinion to demonstrate understanding. Poster content demonstrates basic understanding. Information on the poster may not be fully correct and/or relevant for the topic and/or supposed over-reliance on own opinion. Poster content demonstrates understanding. Information on the poster is generally relevant and correct but may contain omissions, errors of judgment and/or some personal opinion. Poster content demonstrates very good understanding. Information on the poster is almost entirely relevant and correct does not rely on own opinion. Poster content demonstrates excellent understanding. Information on the poster is entirely relevant, correct, and based on research instead of own opinion. 2. Demonstrate synthesis and summarizing skills by displaying a clear and concise message on the poster. 30% No message on the poster. Failure to demonstrate synthesis and summarizing skills. Poster message is unclear because it is insufficient or because it is confused, overly expansive and not concise. Failure to demonstrate synthesis and summarizing skills. Poster message is unclear because it is insufficient or because it is confused, overly expansive and not concise. Attempt at synthesizing and summarizing: message is not entirely clear to the viewer and/or message is not entirely concise. Synthesis and summarising skills demonstrated: viewers can understand the message although it may require some clarification. Generally concise message. Good synthesis and summarising skills demonstrated: viewers can understand the message without requiring further clarification. Generally concise message. Message is entirely clear and concisely presented. There is no need for viewers to gain clarification. 3. Ability to effectively use structure, aesthetics and layout on the poster. 20% No discernible attempt to use structure, aesthetics and layout. Failure to design an effective poster. Inappropriate or highly unsuitable use of structure, aesthetics and/or layout. An unengaging and not aesthetically pleasing poster. Failure to design an effective poster. Inappropriate or unsuitable use of structure, aesthetics and/or layout. An unengaging and not aesthetically pleasing poster. A reasonable attempt to design a poster, which could be more effective. Structure, aesthetics and/or layout are not entirely appropriate or suitable. Poster is only somewhat engaging and aesthetically pleasing. A well designed and generally effective poster. There may be inconsistencies and/or unsuitable elements in structure, aesthetics and/or layout. Generally engaging and aesthetically pleasing. A well designed and effective poster. Structure, aesthetics and layout are all appropriate and suitable but could be more engaging and aesthetically pleasing. An exceptional poster: highly effective, engaging and aesthetically pleasing in terms of structure, aesthetics and layout. 4. Breadth and quality of research, using a minimum of 5 academic sources. 10% No academic sources used. Possible Academic Misconduct case. Limited amount of academic sources (<5) and/or="" use="" of="" poor="" quality="" inappropriate="" sources.="" some="" may="" be="" fictional="" or="" irrelevant.="" limited="" amount="" of="" academic="" sources=""><5) and/or="" use="" of="" poor="" quality="" inappropriate="" sources.="" some="" may="" be="" fictional="" or="" irrelevant.="" five="" suitable="" sources="" used,="" which="" may="" include="" a="" couple="" of="" poorer="" quality="" sources="" (e.g.="" websites;="" lecture="" notes).="" a="" body="" (="">5) of generally high-quality and appropriate sources, which may include small omissions and/or errors of judgment. A body (>5) of almost entirely high-quality and appropriate sources. An extensive body (every claim is referenced) of purely high-quality and highly appropriate academic sources. 5. Correct use of the APA referencing system. 10% No use of the APA referencing system in the assignment, or the reference list with no correctly cited sources. Very poor use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and/or in the reference list, with incorrectly cited sources. Unsatisfactory use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and/or in the reference list, with few correctly cited sources. Satisfactory use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list; mistakes and/or omissions present. Competent use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list; generally correctly cited sources but small omissions and/or errors of judgment may be present. Very good use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list with almost entirely correctly cited sources. Faultless use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list with completely correctly cited sources. MGMT20140 Term 2 2018 Assessment 1 (Poster) Assessment Criteria · Demonstrate understanding of Design Thinking by providing correct information on the poster (30%) · Demonstrate a breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 5 academic sources (10%) · Correct use of the APA referencing system (10%) · Demonstrate synthesis and summarising skills by displaying a clear and concise message on the poster (30%) · Ability to effectively use structure, aesthetics and layout on the poster (20%) See Moodle for more detailed assessment rubric. Late submission and academic misconduct penalties apply as per the university regulations. As Masters students you are required to engage in research as per the Australia Quality Framework (AQF) guidelines. Two specific requirements need to be considered. Students need to demonstrate “a body of knowledge that includes the understanding of recent developments in a discipline and/or area of professional practice, and demonstrate "knowledge of research principles and methods applicable to a field of work and/or learning”. Each unit in your course has a number of required weekly readings in terms of academic texts, journals and business publications that represent the appropriate body of knowledge and recent developments referred to by the AQF. In order to demonstrate the ability to engage in appropriate research, students should read and utilise these texts and journals and publications, and as Masters students, indicate a willingness to research beyond this minimum standard through additional texts, journals and studies that demonstrate an ability to engage in independent research. Students should insure that they understand the specific research that is required for each assessment piece and recognise that if they meet this minimum requirement, you will receive the minimum grade for demonstrated research. Your attention is drawn to the University’s stated position on plagiarism. THE WORK OF OTHERS, WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE ASSIGNMENT MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO ITS SOURCE (a full list of references must be submitted as part of the assessment). Good Practice Poster Examples Here are some good and very good posters from previous terms. Please do note that they all have their own individual flaws and none of them are perfect. Please remember that these are NOT based on your given task – the question these students had to answer for their poster was different from yours, so please use these to help you but don’t blindly copy the approaches! Clear and logical, REF included, some pictures, but very wordy and could be visualised better than with the text. Boring background and A LOT OF text (this was criticised when marking). The overall message is really clear in terms of the large font and the thought bubble. Clear and logical structure and effective layout. References included. Sufficient detail to be self- explanatory. Clear, logical, effective structure. A little boring background but it seems like a conscious choice and it works effectively. Effective display of references. Sufficient detail to be self-explanatory. A bit crammed but the footsteps are an effective way of guiding thru the poster. REFs there. Self-explanatory. Relies on text, pictures, colours and boxes to visually display the content. Fairly clear message although personal opinion could have been brought out better. Very wordy (this is an academic poster as often seen at conferences), but clear logic, structure, message, REF, and some pictures to break up the text. Logical, well structured, clear message, REF, etc. Very wordy. Less wordy, boring background and visually less appealing than others; REF included and clear message although the focus on own opinion could be better. REF included, clear layout and structure, could do with a little more clarity around the text (not a lot of words and possibly too few given the complexity of the message they want to get across). Clear and logical, good message, much visual content and REF list. Too many pictures simply copied onto the poster but otherwise good balance of text and visual aids.