I need the attached 10 questions answered in 200 words each like the instructions say for a total of 2000 words. It is not an essay, I just need all the questions answered in 200 words each.

BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
1. Name and discuss the 5 ethical traps that tempt business and professional communicators and explain how the 4 ethical rules can help managers and employees avoid falling victim to the traps. (200 words or more).
Answer: Employees must be cautious about the following ethical traps that frequently entice business and professional communicators.
a. The trap of false necessity refers to reminding oneself that one has no other choices.
b. The trap of relative filth is assessing one's unethical behavior compared to another person's substantially more unethical conduct.
c. The trap of rationalization refers to making rationalizations or excuses to justify one's unethical behavior.
d. The trap of self-deception is persuading oneself that something is authentic is not a lie.
e. The trap of the end justifying the means refers to choosing unethical routes to achieve a desired outcome.
There are four ethical rules.
· The Utilitarian Rule: According to this rule, managers ought to take decisions that benefit more people. Managers can avoid choosing options that are good for only a few at the cost of many by assessing the repercussions of their decisions on all parties involved.
· The Moral Rights Rule asserts that managers must make decisions that respect and protect all individuals' fundamental rights. Managers can evade making choices that infringe on the moral standards of equity, fairness, and reverence for human dignity by thinking about the rights of employees, customers, and other interested parties.
· The Justice Rule: According to this rule, managers must arrive at fair and impartial decisions and deal with everyone involved with equity. Managers may prevent choosing options that are prejudiced or improperly favor one group over another by considering the interests of all parties involved.
· The Practical Rule: According to this rule, managers should base their decisions on tangible and achievable factors instead of vague or theoretical concepts. Managers can prevent making unrealistic choices that are unrealistic or based on incorrect assumptions if they think of the real-world consequences of their decisions.
2. Feedback involves the verbal and visual response to a message. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of feedback? (200 words or more)
Answer: Feedback is an integral part of communication that entails responding to a message verbally or visually. Even though feedback has numerous benefits, it also has some drawbacks. Establishing connections with customers and colleagues requires feedback in business communication. Although collecting feedback has advantages and disadvantages, it is critical to balance them in order to arrive at a wise choice. One benefit of feedback is that it may contribute to better communication. Feedback can help clear up miscommunication and confirm that the message is picked up and comprehended clearly and purposefully. Feedback creates a mechanism for two-way communication that allows message delivery to be verified and can assist in detecting locations for improvement. By offering positive criticism and pointing out areas for improvement, feedback can be used to enhance performance. Giving feedback shows that one cares about the individual or team's success, which can help develop trust and rapport. Feedback can boost participation and commitment by giving people a feeling of ownership and an active role in the process. Feedback, on the other hand, can be a waste of time and resources. Feedback can be misconstrued, resulting in confusion or miscommunication, specifically if it is not conveyed effectively or if the recipient has different expectations. Customers may occasionally provide irrelevant or negative feedback, causing businesses to become frustrated and discouraged. Furthermore, managing and analysing feedback can be difficult, especially when dealing with large volumes of responses.
3. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the autocratic or authoritarian leadership style as defined by both the Three Dimension Theory and Situational Contingency Theory. (200 words or more)
Answer: Autocratic or authoritarian leadership is a form of leadership in which an individual has full authority over group decisions, with minimal or no input from group members. The Three Dimension Theory and Situational Contingency Theory offer opposing viewpoints on the benefits and drawbacks of this leadership style. Autocratic leadership is one of three leadership styles recognized by the Three Dimension Theory, with the remaining two being democratic and laissez-faire. Autocratic leaders are typically directive, commanding, and task-oriented. Some benefits of autocratic leadership consist of rapid decision-making, which can contribute to more effective implementation of organizational goals. Autocratic leaders can arrive at decisions more quickly because they do not need group approval. They can also provide precise directions and confirm that assigned duties are finished on time without uncertainty. Autocratic leadership can also be helpful in instances requiring swift action, particularly during a crisis. However, one of the disadvantages of autocratic leadership is the absence of contributions from group members. It can result in a discouraged and detached team. Members of a group may feel underappreciated and unreliable, which can result in a decrease in satisfaction with work and dedication. Autocratic leaders may also foster an environment that promotes...